首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到17条相似文献,搜索用时 248 毫秒
1.
位于青藏高原东缘的龙门山前陆盆地是中国典型的前陆盆地之一。自晚三叠世以来,该盆地充填了厚度大于1万余米的海相至陆相沉积物,以不整合面为界可将其划分为6个构造层序,根据几何形态将构造层序区分为两种类型,即楔状构造层序和板状构造层序,其中晚三叠世、晚侏罗世、晚白垩世—古近纪构造层序为楔状构造层序,其余为板状构造层序。研究结果表明楔状构造层序为逆冲构造负载的产物,板状构造层序为走滑剥蚀卸载的产物。本次以晚三叠世前陆盆地为典型的楔状前陆盆地开展了逆冲构造负载系统的弹性挠曲动力学模拟,以晚新生代龙门山前陆盆地为典型的板状前陆盆地开展了与走滑剥蚀卸载系统的弹性挠曲动力学模拟,并计算了龙门山构造负载系统向扬子克拉通的推进速率,结果表明龙门山造山楔的推进速率在早期较快(如晚三叠世最大推进速率达15mm/a),晚期较慢(如晚侏罗世、晚白垩世—古近纪最大推进速率仅为6.7mm/a)。进而推测龙门山幕式逆冲作用的构造驱动力来自于青藏高原中生代以来的基麦里大陆加积碰撞和印度与亚洲板块碰撞作用,其中晚三叠世楔状构造层序是羌塘板块与亚洲大陆碰撞的产物,晚侏罗世楔状构造层序是拉萨板块与亚洲大陆碰撞的产物,晚白垩世—古近纪楔状构造层序是科希斯坦板块、印度板块与亚洲大陆碰撞的产物。  相似文献   

2.
印支期龙门山造山楔推进作用与前陆型礁滩迁移过程研究   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
马鞍塘期龙门山前陆盆地是印支期造山楔加载于扬子地台西缘而形成的挠曲前陆盆地。根据地表露头、钻孔剖面和地震反射剖面资料,本文通过分析前陆盆地早期前陆缓坡型鲕粒滩-硅质海绵礁组合在时间和空间上的迁移规律,标定了卡尼期龙门山造山楔的推进速率。结果表明:卡尼期马鞍塘组是分布于底部不整合面之上的第一套地层单元,在垂向上前陆型鲕粒滩-硅质海绵礁组合显示为鲕粒灰岩滩-生物碎屑滩-硅质海绵礁灰岩-泥页岩的向上变细的沉积序列,记录了前缘隆起边缘碳酸盐缓坡和海绵礁的构建和淹没过程,反映了在相对海平面的持续上升中鲕粒滩-硅质海绵礁被淹没致死的过程。在横向上,盆地结构显示为西厚东薄,并向西倾斜的不对称盆地,由西向东依次分布了深水盆地、碳酸盐缓坡和海绵礁和浅水滨岸带等沉积物类型,显示了从龙门山造山楔向前陆一侧具有泥页岩向鲕粒滩-硅质海绵礁的变化特征。其中鲕粒滩-硅质海绵礁丘组合发育于15~30m深度的前陆同斜缓坡上,呈面向西的条带状展布,其走向线与龙门山冲断带的走向大致平行。并可将其划分为7个鲕粒滩-硅质海绵礁相带,表明卡尼期硅质海绵礁丘和滩沿底部不整合面向南东方向的前陆缓坡超覆,其超覆线和相带的走向与龙门山冲断带的走向平行,显示了7条硅质海绵礁丘和滩是随着相对海平上升过程而向南东方向的前陆缓坡超覆过程中逐次形成的。卡尼期硅质海绵礁迁移速率为18mm·yr-1,其与龙门山造山楔推进速率(15mm·yr-1)基本一致,表明印支期龙门山逆冲楔推进速率与前陆鲕粒滩-硅质海绵礁丘迁移速率具有明显的耦合关系。据此,本次提出了龙门山前陆盆地早期前陆型碳酸盐缓坡和硅质海绵礁的迁移模式,其形成的过程为:龙门山造山楔于卡尼期初始构造负载于扬子板块西缘,导致了前陆地区的挠曲沉降,形成了前陆盆地,驱动了相对海平面的持续上升,前陆盆地处于欠补偿状态,当相对海平面上升速率与硅质海绵礁生长速率相同时,在15~30m深度的前陆同斜缓坡上发育了鲕粒滩-硅质海绵礁丘组合,随着龙门山造山楔不断地的向前陆地区推进,前陆盆地内相对海平面持续上升,逐次在前陆缓坡上15~30m深度的的位置开启了新的硅质海绵礁群的生长窗,形成了本区卡尼期7条带状展布的鲕粒滩-硅质海绵礁丘组合。因此,硅质海绵礁的淹没过程和迁移过程是龙门山造山楔向扬子克拉通推进过程的沉积响应,显示了在卡尼期-诺利期松潘-甘孜残留洋盆的迅速闭合和逆冲楔构造负载向扬子板块推进的动力学过程。  相似文献   

3.
印支期泸州-开江古隆起位于四川盆地东部,由于其顶部广泛发育的岩溶不整合面是四川盆地重要的油气储集层而受到广泛关注,但是关于该古隆起的形成时间及成因机制长期存在很大分歧,既影响了对印支期上扬子地区构造演化的认识,也不利于四川盆地油气勘探工作.基于地震、钻井和野外露头资料,详细分析泸州-开江古隆起顶部不整合面,结合区域构造事件、全球海平面变化等资料,利用前陆盆地系统演化模型对泸州-开江古隆起的演化过程及动力机制进行系统分析.认为泸州-开江古隆起的形成及发展期在晚三叠世卡尼期-诺利期,消亡于瑞替期,该古隆起是晚三叠世龙门山前陆盆地系统的一个组成单元——前缘隆起,其演化过程主要受控于晚三叠世龙门山造山楔的构造负载和前陆盆地沉积物的沉积负载.晚三叠世,在华北板块和羌塘地体共同向扬子陆块西缘汇聚的构造背景下,扬子陆块西缘发生NW-SE向地壳缩短,导致龙门山造山楔向扬子克拉通的逆冲推覆作用,控制了泸州-开江古隆起的形成与演化.  相似文献   

4.
晚三叠世龙门山前陆盆地分布于扬子克拉通西缘,属于印支期造山楔构造负载驱动的挠曲型前渊凹陷.其中卡尼期马鞍塘组是分布于底部不整合面之上的第一套地层单元,记录了前缘隆起边缘碳酸盐缓坡和海绵礁的构建和淹没过程.据钻孔揭示马鞍塘组的最大厚度超过250m,显示为西北厚东南薄的楔形结构,从北西向南东依次分布了深水盆地、碳酸盐缓坡和海绵礁和浅水滨岸带等沉积物类型.其中碳酸盐缓坡和海绵礁分布于前陆盆地的远端,呈面向西的条带状展布,其走向线与龙门山冲断带的走向大致平行.碳酸盐缓坡和海绵礁的厚度介于30~100m之间,由北西向南东变薄.在垂向上,马鞍塘组由3部分构成,下部为鲕粒滩和生物碎屑滩,中部为海绵礁,上部为黑色页岩,显示为向上变细、变深的沉积序列.在Li et al.(2003)盆地模拟的基础上,本次对卡尼期前陆盆地的沉降速率、沉积速率、海绵礁生长速率、相对海平面上升速率进行了定量计算,其中沉降速率为0.10mm·a-1、沉积速率为0.04mm·a-1、海绵礁生长速率为0.03mm·a-1、相对海平面上升速率介于0.01mm·a-1~0.05mm · a-1之间.研究结果表明:在卡尼期早期,相对海平面处于初始上升阶段,相对海平面上升速率较小,盆地处于欠补偿状态,沉积了碳酸盐缓坡型鲕粒滩和生物碎屑滩;在卡尼期中期,相对海平面上升速率等于海绵礁生长速率,海绵礁持续保持垂直向上的生长状态,形成了高度达100余米的塔礁;在卡尼期晚期,相对海平面上升速率大于海绵礁生长速率,礁顶的水深逐步变大,导致礁体被淹溺致死,从而在卡尼期形成了鲕粒灰岩滩-生物碎屑滩-海绵礁灰岩-页岩的向上变细、变深的沉积序列,显示了前陆盆地早期碳酸盐缓坡和海绵礁生长并被淹没的特有模式.本次研究成果表明龙门山前陆盆地的底部不整合面和碳酸盐缓坡、海绵礁的淹没过程是扬子板块西缘印支期造山楔逆冲构造负载的挠曲变形的产物,显示了在卡尼期松潘-甘孜残留洋盆的迅速闭合和造山楔构造负载向扬子板块的推进过程.  相似文献   

5.
晚三叠世龙门山前陆盆地须家河组物源及构造背景分析   总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4  
晚三叠世龙门山前陆盆地早期的沉积物源及构造演化长期存在争议,争论的焦点主要在晚三叠世诺利期及同期沉积的须家河组下部地层。通常认为龙门山前陆盆地的西侧边界为龙门山主断裂,北川-映秀断裂,须家河组地层的地表出露范围均位于该断裂以东区域。近期的汶川科学钻探首次在北川-映秀断裂以西发现了须家河组下部地层,为龙门山前陆盆地早期的演化过程提供了新的证据。上三叠统诺利阶须家河组下部的砂岩骨架颗粒中石英、长石、岩屑的平均含量分别为43%、4%和35%,岩屑颗粒呈次棱角状,岩屑主要为弱变质的粉砂岩、泥岩,具有锆石、金红石、电气石、重晶石的重矿物组合特征,表明物源来自再旋回沉积岩。据Dickinson的三角判别图解分析,其物源区构造背景为再旋回造山带。通过微量元素和稀土元素的地球化学分析,再次确定其物源为上地壳长英质岩。龙门山前缘须家河组下部地层与松潘甘孜中—上三叠统的REE球粒陨石标准化配分模式以及碎屑锆石U-Pb年龄分布特征相似。通过与须家河组潜在物源区的综合对比分析,本文认为诺利期的须家河组具有前陆盆地的双物源特征,其物源主要来自松潘甘孜褶皱带,并有少量来自扬子板块西缘。微量和稀土元素比值特征及构造背景判别图解分析表明,诺利期龙门山前缘须家河组的沉积构造背景为大陆岛弧,沉积盆地类型应为弧后前陆盆地。结合龙门山造山带-前陆盆地系统的构造事件研究,以及本文对于须家河组下部的物源和构造背景分析,表明在卡尼末期古特提斯洋东缘出现强烈挤压,松潘甘孜东缘发生褶皱并逆冲在扬子板块西缘之上形成古岛弧,逆冲断裂为茂汶断裂,须家河组的西侧沉积范围,即前陆盆地的西侧边界为茂汶断裂。到诺利期末和瑞替期初,龙门山造山带形成,须家河组沉积范围缩至北川-映秀断裂以东,龙门山前陆盆地的西侧边界为北川-映秀断裂。  相似文献   

6.
在大量野外地质调查和资料分析的基础上,通过不同剖面的沉积特征和地层对比分析,识别出上扬子西南部存在晚三叠世古隆起;并结合区域构造背景,探讨了古隆起的构造属性、演化和大地构造意义。研究结果表明,上扬子西南部普遍缺失上三叠统,这一地层的缺失不是后期剥蚀造成的,而是由于上扬子西南部在晚三叠世存在一个与上扬子西南缘近平行的古隆起。该古隆起的发育与金沙江-哀牢山-马江-八布洋、甘孜-理塘洋的关闭及之后的碰撞造山作用密切相关。在早三叠世末,金沙江-哀牢山-马江-八布洋关闭,上扬子西南部南缘的右江和楚雄盆地成为前陆盆地,形成的前缘隆起共同组成了该古隆起;至晚三叠世诺利期,甘孜-理塘洋关闭,上扬子西南部西缘发育西昌前陆盆地,其前缘隆起与右江、楚雄前陆盆地的前缘隆起一起组成古隆起;至瑞替期末,由于右江前陆盆地停止发育,古隆起仅由楚雄和西昌前陆盆地的前缘隆起组成。这一古隆起的发现对研究四川盆地晚三叠世盆地原型和上扬子西南部构造演化具有重要意义。  相似文献   

7.
四川盆地上三叠统构造层序划分及盆地演化   总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3  
晚三叠世是四川盆地演化的重要时期。根据野外露头、钻井和地震资料,运用构造层序地层学的思路和方法,对四川盆地上三叠统层序界面、层序划分和层序特征进行深入研究,并建立层序地层格架。研究表明,四川盆地上三叠统可识别出4个层序界面:1)上三叠统与中、下三叠统之间的区域性构造不整合面;2)须二段与小塘子组的分界面;3)须三段与须四段之间的次级构造不整合面;4)三叠系与侏罗系之间的区域性构造不整合面。根据层序界面的发育情况,将研究区划分为3个构造层序,每个层序以最大湖泛面为界,划分为盆地扩张体系域(BE)和盆地收缩体系域(BW)2个体系域。晚三叠世四川盆地的演化主要是川西前陆盆地的演化,其中TS1为边缘前陆盆地演化阶段;TS2为川西前陆盆地形成阶段,龙门山逆冲推覆体开始逆冲推覆;TS3为川西前陆盆地发展阶段,受安县运动的影响,龙门山逆冲褶皱成山,使得整个四川盆地进入了陆相沉积环境。构造运动是控制晚三叠世四川盆地演化的重要因素。  相似文献   

8.
克拉通边缘前陆盆地动力层序地层学   总被引:5,自引:1,他引:5  
通过近几年对层序地层学的深入研究,尤其是对上扬子地台西缘中三叠世拉丁期末和晚三叠世卡尼期周缘前陆盆地层序地层学的研究,提出了动力层序地层学,将边缘前陆盆地由盆缘逆冲断块向克拉通稳定边缘分为A区带和B区带。  相似文献   

9.
川西龙门山前陆盆地构造沉降初步分析   总被引:7,自引:0,他引:7       下载免费PDF全文
研究表明,龙门山冲断带是川西前陆盆地的主要物源区,它的逆冲推覆活动直接控制着川西前陆盆地的沉积类型和沉积物供给量,晚三叠世诺利期,瑞替期和晚侏罗世早中期是川西前陆盆地构造沉降速率较高时期,反映龙门山冲断带在这些时期的逆冲推覆速率较大,是逆冲推覆作用构造抬升的强烈时期;而早侏罗世是该地区构造沉降时,估算龙门山逆冲推覆体在各个不同时期的抬升高度和抬升速率。  相似文献   

10.
巴颜喀拉-川西边缘前陆盆地演化   总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4  
巴颜喀拉古特提斯洋的消亡过程反映在巴颜喀拉残留盆地到边缘前陆盆地转化的沉积记录中。鉴于这个前陆盆地与其向克拉通延伸的组成部分——四川盆地现为龙门山逆冲带所分隔,以致已往的沉积盆地研究多将其相割裂,本文将结合巴颜喀拉洋的消亡过程,把这两个盆地视为一个统一整体来加以分析,研究其演变历程。
晚二叠世,扬子板块向西楔入的同时,发生向北(昆仑-柴达木陆块)和向南(羌塘-昌都陆块)的双向俯冲消减。本文提出了巴颜喀拉洋的主体闭合,从而开始转化为边缘前陆盆地阶段的时间是在拉丁(T22)中晚期,而不是晚三叠世的见解。这点可由拉丁中晚期时,四川盆地川中广大地区形成与前陆挠曲沉降相对应的前陆隆起得以证明。此时期发生的前陆沉降,结束了被动边缘的饥饿(T1—T21)沉积盆地状态,充填了厚逾2,000—10,000m的类复理石沉积,并向扬子克拉通边缘超覆。随着逆冲带的由北向南推进,在诺利一瑞替期形成了滨海含煤磨拉石和陆相含煤磨拉石(逆冲褶皱带地区大多后期被剥蚀)。晚三叠世中晚期,逆冲带侵位推进到四川盆地西部边缘的龙门山地带,从而前陆盆地迁移入四川盆地内,进入陆内汇聚的后造山陆相磨拉石前陆盆地阶段。晚白垩世一早第三纪,因四川盆地晚期的抬升,这一前陆盆地便逐渐萎缩消亡。  相似文献   

11.
楚雄中生代前陆盆地的构造沉降史研究   总被引:14,自引:1,他引:13       下载免费PDF全文
云南楚雄盆地位于场子陆块的西南边缘,为一典型的中生代周缘前陆盆地,盆地演化阶段明显,晚三叠世为前陆早期复理石沉积,侏罗纪则为前陆晚期磨拉石沉积。对盆地构造沉降史研究后笔者认为:①晚三叠世复理石沉积盆地构造沉降幅度巨大,沉降与沉积中心位于盆地最西部,紧邻古哀牢山造山带,沉积体呈形楔形展布;③侏罗纪磨拉石沉积盆地构造沉降和沉积中心以及前缘隆起向内陆方向迁移明显;③中生代构造快速沉降的沉积体的楔形展布表  相似文献   

12.
It is shown that the middle Cretaceous succession in the northern Cordilleran foreland basin consists of several-million-year tectonically-driven cycles comprising two components: strata deposited in an underfilled basin with a prominent forebulge zone and strata deposited in an overfilled basin lacking evidence of a forebulge. The episodic thrusting of the Cordilleran orogenic wedge and its rich sediment supply to the basin are two main controlling factors for the formation of these cycles. A qualitative model of several-million-year tectonically-driven underfilled–overfilled cycle for migration and stratigraphic fill in this basin is proposed. During the early underfilled period (orogenic loading period), due to orogenic loading of emplaced thrust sheets, flexural subsidence is created in the region proximal to the mountain belt and a prominent forebulge is developed. During the late underfilled period (early orogenic unloading period), as the cratonward migration of the subsidence center of sediment loading in the foredeep zone, forebulge zones and backbulge zones migrate cratonwards, forming a diachronic erosion surface in the central basin. During the overfilled period (late orogenic unloading period), a prominent erosion forms in the proximal basin and a peripheral sag develops above the forebulge area of the previous underfilled period. This model may provide a pattern to subdivide sedimentary successions in the Cordilleran foreland basin. Using this model, alternative interpretations are suggested for some important, but controversial stratigraphic phenomena in the Cretaceous Cordilleran foreland basin: traditionally defined eustatic highstands, wide sedimentation area of the basin, erosion surfaces and widespread subtle topographic uplifts in the central basin, high-frequency coarsening-up cycles, extensively distributed erosive-based sandstones and conglomerates enclosed in marine mudstones.  相似文献   

13.
青藏高原东缘龙门山前陆逆冲带复合结构与生长   总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0  
位于青藏高原东缘的北东向龙门山逆冲带,研究已经证明是中生代与新生代前陆复合扩展和生长的结果。然而,2008年5·12汶川地震地表破裂、余震和滑坡等的单向和分段迁移现象,对龙门山复合逆冲带的结构认识提出了挑战。文章在已有研究成果基础上,针对龙门山复合生长下构建的特殊结构进行了野外调查和构造解析。结果表明,以中生代与新生代两期前陆逆冲带复合生长为基础,龙门山复合逆冲带具有特殊的、主要由前陆逆冲楔叠加后形成的复合结构,而且这种复合逆冲楔具有分级和时序特征;中生代前陆逆冲楔是以逆冲断层-褶皱为特征,并分别组合形成碧口厚皮逆冲推覆体、唐王寨薄皮逆冲推覆体和龙王庙逆冲推覆体,总体从晚三叠世以前开始,至~160 Ma向南递进扩展生长;新生代前陆逆冲楔由逆冲断层和逆冲岩片组成,分为约35~10 Ma和10 Ma以来两个阶段,向南东向递进扩展生长,并可能与川西盆地东侧龙泉山构造相连通。因此,龙门山逆冲带具有前陆逆冲带和生长过程的双重复合结构。   相似文献   

14.
Intracontinental subduction of the South China Block below the North China Block in the Late Triassic resulted in formation of the transpressional Sichuan foreland basin on the South China Block. The Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation was deposited in this basin and consists of an eastward-tapering wedge of predominantly continental siliciclastic sedimentary rocks that are up to 3.5 km thick in the western foredeep depocenter and thin onto the forebulge and into backbulge depocenters.Five facies associations (A–E) make up the Xujiahe Formation and these are interpreted, respectively, as alluvial fan, transverse and longitudinal braided river, meandering river, overbank or shallow lacustrine, and deltaic deposits. This study establishes a sequence stratigraphic framework for the Xujiahe Formation which is subdivided into four sequences (SQ1, 2, 3 and 4). Sequence boundaries are recognized on the basis of facies-tract dislocations and associated fluvial rejuvenation and incision, and systems tracts are identified based on their constituent facies associations and changes in architectural style and sediment body geometries. Typical sequences consist of early to late transgressive systems tract deposits related to a progressive increase in accommodation and represented by Facies Associations A, B and C that grade upwards into Facies Association D. Regionally extensive and vertically stacked coal seams define maximum accommodation and are overlain by early highstand systems tract deposits represented by Facies Associations D, E and C. Late highstand systems tract deposits are rare because of erosion below sequence boundaries. Sequence development in the Xujiahe Formation is attributed to active and quiescent phases of thrust-loading events and is closely related to the tectonic evolution of the basin. The Sichuan Basin experienced three periods of thrust loading and lithospheric flexure (SQ1, lower SQ2 and SQ3), two periods of stress relaxation and basin widening (upper SQ 2 and SQ3) and one phase of isostatic rebound (SQ4). Paleogeographic reconstruction of the Sichuan Basin in the Late Triassic indicates that the Longmen Mountains to the west, consisting of metamorphic, sedimentary and pre-Neoproterozoic basement granitoid rocks, was the major source of sediment to the foredeep depocenter. Subordinate sediment sources were the Xuefeng Mountains to the east to backbulge depocenters, and the Micang Mountains to the northwest during the late history of the basin. This study has demonstrated the viability of sequence stratigraphic analysis in continental successions in a foreland basin, and the influence of thrust loading on sequence development.  相似文献   

15.
川西龙门山前陆盆地中砂砾质楔形体的定量统计   总被引:5,自引:1,他引:4       下载免费PDF全文
从川西龙门山前陆盆地上三叠统一侏罗系沉积纪录可以看出,早中侏罗世以后整个盆地地层构型为一个板状特征,但在其近造山带一侧的盆地边缘又有大量的冲积粗碎屑存在,砂砾质粗碎屑楔形体在早中侏罗世主要位于龙门山前缘中北段,而晚侏罗世一早白垩世则明显地向南西方向迁移,盆地在不同时期,不同部位和不同成分的砂砾质粗碎屑楔形体的时空展布显示物源迁移明显,这是龙门山造山带走滑作用沉积的产物。  相似文献   

16.
Cenozoic sedimentary deposits in central-southern Ningxia province, NW China are an important record of Tertiary tectonic events along the evolving Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau’s northeast margin. Shortly after the onset of the Indo-Eurasia collision to the south, a thrust belt and adjoining foreland basin began to form during 40–30 Ma. The Eocene Sikouzi Formation developed in a distal setting to this basin, in normal fault-bound basins that may have formed in a forebulge setting. Subsequent deposition of the Oligocene Qingshuiying Formation occurred during a phase of apparently less intense tectonism and the previous underfilled foreland basin became overfilled. During the Early Miocene, contractional deformation was mainly distributed to the west of the Liupan Shan. This resulted in deformation of the Qingshuiying Formation as indicated by an unconformity with the overlying Miocene Hongliugou Formation. The unconformity occurs proximal to the Haiyuan Fault suggesting that the Haiyuan Fault may have begun movement in the Early Miocene. In the Late Miocene, thrusting occurred west of the southern Helan Shan and an unconformity developed between the Hongliugou and Qingshuiying Formations proximal to the the Cha-Gu Fault. Relationships between the Miocene stratigraphy and major faults in the region imply that during the Late Miocene the deformation front of the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau had migrated to the Cha-Gu Fault along the western Ordos Margin, and the Xiang Shan was uplifted. Central-southern Ningxia was then incorporated into the northeast propagating thrust wedge. The driving force for NE propagation of the thrust wedge was most likely pronounced uplift of the northeastern plateau at the same time. Analysis of the sedimentary record coupled with consideration of the topographic evolution of the region suggests that the evolving fold-and-thrust belt experienced both forward-breaking fold-and-thrust belt development, and out-of-sequence fault displacements as the thrust wedge evolved and the foreland basin became compartmentalised. The documented sedimentary facies and structural relationship also place constraints on the Miocene-Recent evolution of the Yellow River and its tributaries.  相似文献   

17.
The northern Yangtze foreland basin system was formed during the Mesozoic continental collision between the North and South China plates along the Mianlue suture. In response to the later phase of intra-continental thrust deformation, an extensive E–W-trending molasse basin with river, deltaic, and lake deposits was produced in front of the southern Qinling–Dabieshan foreland fold-and-thrust belt during the Early–Middle Jurassic (201–163 Ma). The basin originated during the Early Jurassic (201–174 Ma) and substantially subsided during the Middle Jurassic (174–163 Ma). A gravelly alluvial fan depositional system developed in the lower part of the Baitianba Formation (Lower Jurassic) and progressively evolved into a meandering river fluvial plain and lake systems to the south. The alluvial fan conglomerates responded to the initial uplift of the southern Qinling–Dabieshan foreland fold-and-thrust belt after the oblique collision between the Yangtze and North China plates during the Late Triassic. The Qianfoya Formation (lower Middle Jurassic) mainly developed from shore-shallow lacustrine depositional systems. The Shaximiao Formation (upper Middle Jurassic) predominantly consists of thick-bedded braided river delta successions that serve as the main body of the basin-filling sequences. The upward-coarsening succession of the Shaximiao Formation was controlled by intense thrusting in the southern Qinling–Dabieshan fold-and-thrust belt. Palaeogeographic reconstructions indicated an extensive E–W foredeep depozone along the fold-and-thrust belt during the Middle Jurassic (174–163 Ma) that was nearly 150 km wide. The depozone extended westward to the Longmenshan and further east to the northern middle Yangtze plate. The northern Yangtze foreland basin was almost completely buried or modified by the subsequent differential thrusting of Dabashan and its eastern regions (Late Jurassic to Cenozoic).  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号