首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 171 毫秒
1.
软土基坑变形失稳形态模拟试验研究   总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4  
通过不同土性、地下水条件下软土基坑开挖变形失稳的模拟试验, 研究了软土基坑开挖变形发展直至失稳破坏的全过程。通过试验研究, 初步认为软土基坑坑壁在无支护或支护刚度较小的情况下, 其坑壁破坏形态呈抛物线型; 在基坑开挖范围内若存在有砂性土, 且地下水位较高时, 易于发生流砂渗透破坏, 并导致了地表沉陷, 但侧向变形相对较小; 而对于因承压水引起的坑底土体隆起变形, 若不考虑土体的强度特性, 计算结果是偏于安全的。  相似文献   

2.
环形超深基坑围护结构受力变形特性分析   总被引:5,自引:0,他引:5  
结合上海世博500 kV变电站超深基坑实际工程,采用平面应变及轴对称弹性地基有限元分析模型对基坑围护结构的空间效应进行简化,分析了环形基坑空间效应、内衬墙以及水土压力模式对围护结构受力变形特性的影响,并与实测结果进行比较。结果表明,环形基坑围护结构的空间效应对其受力变形特性影响很大,在计算过程中必须考虑围护结构环向刚度对径向刚度的贡献;内衬墙作用类似于环形支撑,对地下连续墙受力及变形是有利的;地下连续墙水平位移实测值最接近于侧压力系数1.0的轴对称有限元分析结果;地下连续墙环向应力和弯矩实测值位于按规范水土分算与侧压力系数1.0的轴对称有限元计算结果之间。  相似文献   

3.
为了更深入地了解软土深开挖引起地铁车站深基坑工程围护结构及邻近建筑的变形特性,结合深厚软黏土地区某个地铁车站深基坑工程进行了系统性监测及结果分析。结果分析表明:地连墙成槽会引起邻近土体侧向位移,最大土体侧向位移值占基坑开挖期间土体侧向位移值20%左右;土体开挖期间南侧(桩基础建筑一侧)、北侧(浅基础建筑一侧)围护结构邻近土体最大侧向位移平均值分别为0.091%H_e和0.120%H_e;y/H_e值(y为垂直连续墙方向上与连续墙的距离,H_e为开挖深度)小于0.92时,基坑开挖引起土体沉降值及沉降差较大;地表变形与浅基础变形较为接近,桩基础建筑变形值明显小于浅基础建筑变形值且嵌岩桩基础建筑变形值最小;邻近浅基础建筑及桩基础建筑均受到空间效应影响,在x/H_e值(x为平行连续墙方向上与端部的距离)小于1.5时,空间效应较为明显,x/H_e值大于2.0时,邻近建筑及围护结构邻近土体变形接近平面应变状态。  相似文献   

4.
内撑式支护的软土基坑开挖抗隆起稳定性分析   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
采用强度折减法有限元方法(SSRFEM),分析了不排水条件下软土地基中内撑式排桩支护基坑开挖的抗隆起稳定性,并研究了软土不排水抗剪强度、支护结构条件、基坑尺寸对基底抗隆起的影响。研究表明,以往通常采用的极限平衡公式,对基坑开挖基底抗隆起稳定分析不能完全考虑支护结构的影响,也不能考虑基坑侧壁位移的影响,在一些条件下误差较大,而SSRFEM分析方法是求解基坑极限状态实际而自然的破坏形式,可很好地分析基底隆起稳定性。  相似文献   

5.
宁波北仑电厂二期循环水泵房基坑支护与监测   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
介绍了宁波北仑电厂二期工程地下连续墙支护结构的计算与监测.采用ALGOR有限元分析系统,对基坑开挖引起的应力场、位移场进行了分析计算.对墙体变形、钢筋应力、土压力及沉降进行了观测.通过计算值与实测结果的比较,分析了影响基坑变形的主要因素.  相似文献   

6.
为了更深入的了解软土深开挖引起地铁车站深基坑工程围护结构及邻近建筑的变形特性,结合深厚软黏土地区某个地铁车站深基坑工程进行了系统性监测及结果分析。结果分析表明:地连墙成槽会引起邻近土体侧向位移,最大土体侧向位移值占基坑开挖期间土体侧向位移值20%左右;土体开挖期间南侧(桩基础建筑一侧)、北侧(浅基础建筑一侧)围护结构邻近土体最大侧向位移平均值分别为0.091%H_e和0.120%H_e;y/H_e值(y,垂直连续墙方向上与连续墙的距离,H_e,开挖深度)小于0.92时,基坑开挖引起土体沉降值及沉降差较大;地表变形与浅基础变形较为接近,桩基础建筑变形值明显小于浅基础建筑变形值且嵌岩桩基础建筑变形值最小;邻近浅基础建筑及桩基础建筑均受到“空间效应”影响,在x/H_e值(x,平行连续墙方向上与端部的距离)小于1.5时“空间效应”较为明显,x/H_e值大于2.0时邻近建筑及围护结构邻近土体变形接近平面应变状态。  相似文献   

7.
为了更深入的了解软土深开挖引起地铁车站深基坑工程围护结构及邻近建筑的变形特性,结合深厚软黏土地区某个地铁车站深基坑工程进行了系统性监测及结果分析。结果分析表明:地连墙成槽会引起邻近土体侧向位移,最大土体侧向位移值占基坑开挖期间土体侧向位移值20%左右;土体开挖期间南侧(桩基础建筑一侧)、北侧(浅基础建筑一侧)围护结构邻近土体最大侧向位移平均值分别为0.091%H_e和0.120%H_e;y/H_e值(y,垂直连续墙方向上与连续墙的距离,H_e,开挖深度)小于0.92时,基坑开挖引起土体沉降值及沉降差较大;地表变形与浅基础变形较为接近,桩基础建筑变形值明显小于浅基础建筑变形值且嵌岩桩基础建筑变形值最小;邻近浅基础建筑及桩基础建筑均受到“空间效应”影响,在x/H_e值(x,平行连续墙方向上与端部的距离)小于1.5时“空间效应”较为明显,x/H_e值大于2.0时邻近建筑及围护结构邻近土体变形接近平面应变状态。  相似文献   

8.
张戈  毛海和 《岩土力学》2016,37(5):1467-1474
为了预测地铁深基坑开挖阶段围护结构的变形特性,从围护结构综合刚度的角度研究了软土地区地铁深基坑的围护结构设计方法。鉴于Clough综合刚度模型存在诸多缺陷,提出了新的MVSS综合刚度模型,其包含了围护墙(桩)刚度、基坑深度、支撑刚度、支撑水平及竖向间距、地基加固等多个变量,反映了基坑围护结构的整体属性。从有限元计算及地铁基坑实测变形等角度验证了MVSS综合刚度合理性,并建立了地铁深基坑围护结构侧向变形与基坑围护综合刚度之间的函数算式。该算式为基坑围护结构的变形预测提供了新的思路与方法。基坑围护结构最大侧向变形与基坑MVSS综合刚度呈递减函数关系,但当其MVSS综合刚度增大至一定程度后,其继续增大对基坑围护结构变形的进一步控制效果甚微。  相似文献   

9.
宁波北仑电厂二期循环水泵房基抗支护与监测   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
介绍了宁波北仑电厂二期工程地下连续墙支护结构的计算与模型。采用ALGOR有限元分析系统,对基坑开挖引起的应力场、位移场进行了分析计算。对墙体变形、钢筋应力、土压力及沉降进行了观测。通过计算值与实测结果的比较,分析了影响基坑变形的主要因素。  相似文献   

10.
以广州地铁9号线在岩溶地区施工深基坑为例,研究岩溶地层基坑施工对周围环境的影响。该车站基坑长259.7 m,宽18.7 m,深15.8 m。基坑深度范围内包括溶洞和砂层,溶洞地层富水、稳定性差、物理力学性质差,砂层厚0~15 m,有较大的渗透性,基坑施工过程中对地下连续墙的侧向位移和地面沉降进行了监测。监测结果表明,基坑开挖结束时地下连续墙的最大侧向位移为12 mm,地面沉降的最大值为10.1 mm,基坑开挖过程中对周围环境的影响很小。研究成果可为今后类似工程施工提供经验借鉴。  相似文献   

11.
Previous studies have shown that use of cross walls in deep excavations can reduce the wall deflection to a very small amount. However, design of cross walls is costly because the deflection behavior of the diaphragm wall with cross walls is in nature three dimensional. The objective of this study was to establish a simplified approach used as a first approximation to design cross walls such that the lateral wall deflection can satisfy a design criterion. A series of parametric studies using a three-dimensional numerical method was performed to obtain the influence factors on wall deflections, including excavation geometry, wall system stiffness, axial stiffness of strut, axial stiffness of the cross wall, normalized undrained shear strength of clay and the cross wall depth. Then, a simplified formula for predicting the wall deflection for excavations without and with cross walls was established using multivariate regression analysis, respectively. The formulas were validated through 36 excavation cases without cross walls and 12 cases with cross walls. The simplified formulas can be used to develop a spreadsheet that estimates the cross wall sizes and intervals based on the entered excavation geometry, material properties of retaining-strut system, in situ undrained shear strength and tolerable wall deflection. The estimated cross wall sizes and intervals should be verified by an appropriate full numerical analysis.  相似文献   

12.
A series of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) finite element analyses using the Hardening Soil (HS) model were carried out to investigate the influences of soil properties, wall stiffness, excavation length, excavation depth, clay thickness at the base of the excavation and wall embedment depth, on the maximum wall deflection induced by braced-excavation. The results show that the 3D maximum wall deflections are generally much smaller than those for 2D. Comparisons were also made with other commonly used semi-empirical charts. Based on the finite element results in this study, a simple wall deflection equation was developed for estimating the maximum wall deflection that takes the 3D effects into consideration through different ratios of excavation length over excavation width.  相似文献   

13.
Deep excavations particularly in deep deposits of soft clay can cause excessive ground movements and result in damage to adjacent buildings. Extensive plane strain finite element analyses considering the small strain effect have been carried out to examine the wall deflections for excavations in soft clay deposits supported by retaining walls and bracing. The excavation geometry, soil strength and stiffness properties, and the wall stiffness were varied to study the wall deflection behavior. Based on these results, a simple Polynomial Regression (PR) model was developed for estimating the maximum wall deflection. Wall deflections computed by this method compare favorably with a number of field and published records.  相似文献   

14.
软土地区采用灌注桩围护的深基坑变形性状研究   总被引:14,自引:1,他引:13  
徐中华  王建华  王卫东 《岩土力学》2009,30(5):1362-1366
根据上海软土地区80个钻孔灌注桩围护的深基坑工程案例有关数据,系统地分析了基坑开挖引致的灌注桩变形性状。所有基坑的灌注桩最大侧向位移介于0.1 %~1.0 %倍的开挖深度之间,平均值为开挖深度的0.44 %。钢筋混凝土支撑和钢支撑在控制墙体的变形上没有明显差别,最大侧向位移一般位于开挖面上下5 m的范围内。无量纲化最大侧向位移随着支撑系统刚度的增大而减小,随着墙底以上软土层厚度的增加而增大,但与灌注桩插入比及坑底抗隆起稳定系数之间并无明显的关系。墙顶侧向位移随着首道支撑位置深度的增加而呈现出指数增长的趋势,而灌注桩最大侧向位移与首道支撑的深度位置无明显关系。  相似文献   

15.
This paper presents an efficient Bayesian back-analysis procedure for braced excavations using wall deflection data at multiple points. Response surfaces obtained from finite element analyses are adopted to efficiently evaluate the wall responses. Deflection data for 49 wall sections from 11 case histories are collected to characterize the model error of the finite element method for evaluating the deflections at various points. A braced excavation project in Hang Zhou, China is chosen to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed procedure. The results indicate that the soil parameters could be updated more significantly for the updating that uses the deflection data at multiple points than that only uses the maximum deflection data. The predicted deflections from the updated parameters agree fairly well with the field observations. The main significance of the proposed procedure is that it improves the updating efficiency of the soil parameters without adding monitoring effort compared with the traditional method that uses the maximum deflection data.  相似文献   

16.
This paper compares the excavation-induced wall deflection caused by the top-down method (TDM) and the bottom-up method (BUM). First, a total of 26 quality excavation case histories in Taipei silty clay were collected and analyzed. The field observations show that the maximum lateral wall deflection (δhm) induced by the TDM were 1.28 times as large as that induced by the BUM. Factors affecting wall deflection are investigated and four of them are selected for further numerical experimentation to investigate the discrepancy of δhm caused by the two methods. Analysis results showed that the average ratio of δhm induced by the TDM over that induced by the BUM is approximately equal to 1.1, excluding the effect of thermal shrinkage of concrete floor slabs. Both observed data and analysis results revealed that greater δhm is generally induced by the TDM despite its use of floor slabs with higher support stiffness.  相似文献   

17.
康志军  谭勇  李想  卫彬  徐长节 《岩土力学》2016,37(10):2909-2914
围护结构最大侧移所在深度是衡量基坑变形的重要指标之一,而目前鲜有关于其对周边环境变形影响的研究。基于工程实测数据分析和有限元数值模拟,系统地研究了基坑围护结构最大侧移深度对邻近桩基础建筑物不均匀沉降和坑外深层土体位移场的影响。经研究发现:围护结构最大侧移的下移会导致坑外土体位移场扩大,进而降低相应区域的桩基础承载力,导致邻近桩基础建筑物发生显著的不均匀沉降。不同深度的土体经历复杂的竖向位移,且位移形态与围护结构最大侧移深度密切相关。随围护结构最大侧移深度的逐渐下移,坑外土体位移场向深层土体发展,且主要影响范围相应地扩大。在实际工程中,根据基坑周边环境合理地控制围护结构最大侧移所在深度,可有效降低基坑开挖对周边环境的不利影响。  相似文献   

18.
Installation of buttress walls against diaphragm walls has been used as an alternative measure for the protection of adjacent buildings during excavation, but their mechanism in reducing movements has not yet been fully understood. This study performs three-dimensional finite element analyses of two excavation case histories, one in clay with T-shape buttress walls and another in dominant sand with rectangular buttress walls, to establish analysis model. Then, a series of parametric study were performed by varying soil types, types and length of buttress walls based on the above-mentioned excavations. Results show that the mechanism of buttress walls in reducing wall deflections mainly came from the frictional resistance between the side surface of buttress wall and adjacent soil rather than from the combined bending stiffness from diaphragm and buttress walls. The buttress wall with a length <2.0 m had a poor effect in reducing the wall deflection because the soil adjacent to the buttress wall had almost the same amount of movement as the buttress wall, causing the frictional resistance little mobilized. Since the frictional resistance of buttress walls in a deep excavation has fully been mobilized prior to the final excavation depth, the efficiency of buttress walls in reducing the wall deflection in a deep excavation was much less than that in a shallow excavation. Rectangular shape of buttress walls was of a better effect than T-shape in the shallow excavation because frictional resistance between buttress walls and adjacent soil played a major role in reducing the wall deflection rather than bearing resistance of the flange. When the excavation went deeper, the difference in reducing the wall deflection between the R-shape and T-shape became small.  相似文献   

19.
This paper adopts the NGI-ADP soil model to carry out finite element analysis,based on which the effects of soft clay anisotropy on the diaphragm wall deflections in the braced excavation were evaluated.More than one thousand finite element cases were numerically analyzed,followed by extensive parametric studies.Surrogate models were developed via ensemble learning methods(ELMs),including the e Xtreme Gradient Boosting(XGBoost),and Random Forest Regression(RFR)to predict the maximum lateral wall deformation(δhmax).Then the results of ELMs were compared with conventional soft computing methods such as Decision Tree Regression(DTR),Multilayer Perceptron Regression(MLPR),and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines(MARS).This study presents a cutting-edge application of ensemble learning in geotechnical engineering and a reasonable methodology that allows engineers to determine the wall deflection in a fast,alternative way.  相似文献   

20.
Numerous studies have been devoted to the performance of excavations and adjacent facilities. In contrast, few studies have focused on retaining wall deflections induced by pre-excavation dewatering. However, considerable inward cantilever deflections were observed for a diaphragm wall in a pre-excavation dewatering test based on a long and narrow metro excavation, and the maximum deflection reached 10 mm (37.6% of the allowable wall deflection for the project). Based on the test results, a three-dimensional soil–fluid coupled finite element model was established and used to study the mechanism of the dewatering-induced diaphragm wall deflections. Numerical results indicated that the diaphragm wall deflection results from three factors: (1) the seepage force around the dewatering well and the soil–wall interaction caused the inward horizontal displacement of the soil inside the excavation; (2) the reduced total earth pressure on the excavated side of the diaphragm wall above approximately 1/2 of the maximum dewatering depth disequilibrated the original earth pressure on both sides of the diaphragm wall; and (3) the different negative friction on the excavated and retained sides of the diaphragm wall led to the rotation of the diaphragm wall into the excavation.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号