首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到17条相似文献,搜索用时 62 毫秒
1.
正全球山地植被垂直带基本类型有限,但其组合形式和结构千姿万态,为世界呈现出无限的山地垂直带谱,特别是同一类垂直带在不同纬度、不同离海距离、不同山体位置都表现出不同的高度分布。垂直带分布在山体或高原内外的高度差异,是非地带性作用的主要结果之一。但对于非地带性作用的规律和机理,一直是自然地理学中最为薄弱的环节。中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所张百平研究员等撰写《山体效应研究》于2015年9月由中国环境出版社出版,该书对山体效应及其影响进行了全面系统地研究,使对非地带性及其作用的认识上了一个台阶,也使对丰富多彩的山地垂直带谱的研究达到了新的科学高度。  相似文献   

2.
科罗拉多落基山脉山体效应定量化研究   总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0  
落基山脉作为北美最大的内陆山地,其山体效应对林线分布具有很大影响,导致林线海拔远高于周围内陆山体及其他海岸山地。然而,以往落基山脉山体效应研究多集中于定性研究,但是山体效应如何量化,如何根据落基山脉的地形气候条件构建区域山体效应的定量化模型,目前鲜有研究。通过分析台站处山体增温及量化落基山脉山体效应的影响因子,并计算最热月均温10℃等温线的海拔高度,来定量化地估算科罗拉多落基山脉山体效应值大小及其对林线分布的影响。结果表明:(1)用山体增温值表示山体效应大小是合理且比较理想的指标。科罗拉多落基山脉增温显著,所有台站的增温均值为2.07℃,增温幅度为0.78~4.29℃。(2)科罗拉多落基山脉山体效应的主要影响因素为山体基面高度和降水大陆度,二者与山体增温构建的线性拟合模型具有较高的解释能力,判定系数高达71.2%。(3)科罗拉多落基山脉不同纬度带山体内外最热月10℃等温线分布高度对比表明,山体内部理想林线高度均高于山体外部的理想林线分布,内外分布差异为400~700 m。定量分析科罗拉多落基山脉的山体效应模型,优化了区域尺度的山体效应模型精度,有助于深入认识山体效应及其对垂直带分布的影响。  相似文献   

3.
根据收集到173个林线数据,采用纬度、经度和基面高度的三元一次方程拟合欧亚大陆东南部林线分布,计算各自的标准回归系数和贡献率,以此来确定山体基面高度(山体效应的简明表达形式)对林线分布高度的影响。结果表明,纬度、经度和山体基面高度对林线分布高度的贡献率分别为30.60%、26.53%、42.87%。以北纬32o为界线,对其以北、以南区域也分别进行了分析,基面高度的贡献率达到24.10%和39.11%。分析不同尺度和区域山体基面高度作用于林线的贡献率不难发现:在欧亚大陆东南部以基面高度代表的山体效应对于林线高度的影响显著,明显地超过了纬度和经度。基面高度的作用受气候条件和海陆位置影响较小,不论大陆内部或沿海,基面高度分异对山地垂直带分异的影响都相对独立和稳定。该结果定量地表明了山体效应对林线分布高度的重要作用。  相似文献   

4.
山体效应对北半球林线分布的影响分析   总被引:3,自引:1,他引:2  
赵芳  张百平  庞宇  姚永慧  韩芳  张朔  齐文文 《地理学报》2012,67(11):1556-1564
通过搜集整理了北半球516 个林线数据, 结合WorldClim 气象数据计算了林线数据点上的大陆度, 并依据SRTM高程数据提取了林线处的山体基面高度(作为山体效应的代用因子), 然后以纬度、大陆度和山体基面高度为解释变量, 建立三元回归模型。结果表明:线性回归模型的判定系数R2为0.904, 二次回归模型的R2高达0.912。相比先前不考虑基面高度的林线分布模型(R2 = 0.79), 纳入了山体基面高度的林线分布模型能够更加有效的拟合半球尺度的林线分布; 结果还表明, 山体基面高度对北半球林线高度分布的贡献率达到了48.94% (p =0.000), 而纬度和大陆度分别为45.02% (p = 0.000) 和6.04% (p = 0.000)。这揭示了山体效应对半球尺度林线分布具有重要的影响。基面高度在北美洲地区对林线高度的贡献率最大(50.49%, p=0.000), 在欧亚大陆东部地区为48.73% (p = 0.000), 在欧亚大陆西部地区为43.6% (p=0.000)。这一结果说明山体效应对林线分布高度的影响虽有区域差异, 但都有较高的贡献率。  相似文献   

5.
山体效应是地理地带性之外,在大尺度上影响垂直带分布的主要因素,山体基面高度则是山体效应的第一影响因子。青藏高原及其周边地区,雪线呈现出中心高、周围低,与山体基面高度相一致的环状分布模式。为分析山体基面高度对雪线分布的影响,本文共收集青藏高原及周边地区雪线数据142个,采用纬度、经度和基面高度为自变量的三元一次方程拟合研究区雪线分布,计算各自的标准回归系数和相对贡献率,再将基面高度划分成5个子集(0~1000 m、1001~2000 m、2001~3000 m、3001~4000 m和4001~5000 m),分析基面高度不同的山地对雪线的影响差异。结果表明:① 在青藏高原,纬度、经度和基面高度对雪线高度分布的相对贡献率分别为51.49%、16.31%和32.20%;② 随着基面高度的增高,各子集模型的决定系数虽有逐渐降低的趋势,但仍保持在较高的值域(R2=0.895~0.668),说明模型的有效性;③ 随基面高度的抬升,纬度和山体基面高度对雪线分布高度的相对贡献率分别表现出降低(92.6%~48.99%,R2=0.855)和增大(3.33%~31.76%,R2=0.582)的趋势,表明基面高度越高,其对雪线分布高度的影响越大。  相似文献   

6.
山体效应是地理地带性之外,在大尺度上影响垂直带分布的主要因素,山体基面高度则是山体效应的第一影响因子。青藏高原及其周边地区,雪线呈现出中心高、周围低,与山体基面高度相一致的环状分布模式。为分析山体基面高度对雪线分布的影响,本文共收集青藏高原及周边地区雪线数据142个,采用纬度、经度和基面高度为自变量的三元一次方程拟合研究区雪线分布,计算各自的标准回归系数和相对贡献率,再将基面高度划分成5个子集(0~1000 m、1001~2000 m、2001~3000 m、3001~4000 m和4001~5000 m),分析基面高度不同的山地对雪线的影响差异。结果表明:① 在青藏高原,纬度、经度和基面高度对雪线高度分布的相对贡献率分别为51.49%、16.31%和32.20%;② 随着基面高度的增高,各子集模型的决定系数虽有逐渐降低的趋势,但仍保持在较高的值域(R2=0.895~0.668),说明模型的有效性;③ 随基面高度的抬升,纬度和山体基面高度对雪线分布高度的相对贡献率分别表现出降低(92.6%~48.99%,R2=0.855)和增大(3.33%~31.76%,R2=0.582)的趋势,表明基面高度越高,其对雪线分布高度的影响越大。  相似文献   

7.
山体效应是隆起的山体所产生的热力效应,其结果之一就是相同垂直带界限自外围向内部有升高的趋势。本文结合MOD11C3地表温度产品和地面144个气象台站实测气象数据,估算青藏高原内外相同高度上的温差(也即高原山体效应值)。具体结论如下:(1)最大温差(10.04℃~11.70℃)出现在高原中南部,即雅鲁藏布江以北藏北高原以南。由此为核心向北、向东、向西均逐渐减小;(2)数据点上同高度内外温差与局部基面高度有紧密关系,基面高度每抬升100 m,温差增加约0.051℃,并有加速增大的趋势;(3)山体基面高度与山体效应存在明显的线性关系,其决定系数R2高达0.5306。但山体基面高度最高的区域山体效应并非最大,说明还有其他因子影响山体效应的大小,可能的因子包括大气湿度、纬度、地形开阔程度等,在建立山体效应数字模型时必须加以考虑;(4)高原山体效应对雪线分布高度的抬升作用更甚于其对林线。山体效应估值最大的区域,分布着6 000 m以上极高雪线;最高林线(4 900 m)分布于本研究中山体效应估算值较低的相对多雨区,因为林线的发育还要求一定的降水量。  相似文献   

8.
阿尔卑斯山山体效应及其对林线的影响分析   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
阿尔卑斯山是欧亚大陆上著名的山地,对欧洲的地理生态格局具有重要的影响。山体效应产生的原因在于隆起的高原或山地吸收了更多的太阳辐射。因此,论文以阿尔卑斯山为研究对象,利用收集到的气象台站观测数据、林线、数字高程数据,以及基于半球视域算法计算得到的太阳辐射数据等,分析阿尔卑斯山气温的空间分布格局以及最热月、最冷月、全年的太阳辐射量,同时以太阳辐射作为山体效应的代用因子,采用逐步回归分析方法构建了阿尔卑斯山林线分布模型,探究该山地的山体效应及其对林线的影响。研究结果表明:① 阿尔卑斯山具有明显的山体效应,山体内部的太阳辐射量远高于山体边缘地区,这也是山体内部气温和林线高度都高于山体边缘地区的主要原因。最热月、最冷月和全年总太阳辐射量在山体内部比边缘地区分别高10~20、20~40和200~400 kWh/m2。② 太阳辐射能更好地定量化山体效应,以太阳辐射为山体效应代用因子建立的林线分布模型具有更高的精度。与基于气温、降水构建的林线分布模型(R2= 0.522)相比,该模型具有更高的模拟精度(R2 = 0.736),同时太阳辐射对林线分布的贡献率最大(1月、7月太阳辐射的贡献率分别为34.75%、27.82%),超过了气温和降水的贡献率(分别为26.24%和11.17%)。  相似文献   

9.
横断山区垂直带谱的分布模式与坡向效应   总被引:5,自引:1,他引:4  
根据收集到的横断山区山地垂直带谱数据,对山地垂直带的坡向效应和空间分布规律进行了分析和研究.结果表明:1)主要的垂直带和垂直带界线如林线、暗针叶林带、雪线等的纬度和经度地带性分布规律明显并且分布模式都相似,纬向上呈开口向下的二次曲线分布模式,经向上呈开口向上的二次曲线分布模式,两者共同形成"双曲抛物面"分布模式,充分反映了横断山区的环境与生态的复杂性和独特性,也进一步丰富和发展了山地垂直带谱的二次曲线假说; 2)横断山区山地垂直带谱表现出明显的基于水分驱动的坡向效应,主要表现为同一山体的东、西坡往往具有不同的基带和带谱结构,相同类型的带谱出现的海拔和分布范围不同,迎风坡表现出较为湿润的类型和带谱结构,而背风坡则表现出更为干旱的类型和组成结构;横断山区的坡向效应主要是由于山体对当地盛行季风的影响,造成迎风坡和背风坡水热条件相差很大,从而发育不同的山地垂直带谱类型.从横断山区山地垂直带谱的空间分布规律来看, 28°~29°N、98°~101°E范围内,即大致在澜沧江以东-雅砻江以西,山地垂直带谱普遍表现出干热的特点,为横断山区干热气候的核心地带.但如何定量分析山地的坡向效应尚有待于进一步的研究和讨论.此外、数据质量和数据误差也对分析的结果,尤其是空间分布模式的数学模拟结果产生一定的影响,在以后的研究中尚需进一步完善.  相似文献   

10.
基于MODIS的秦巴山地气温估算与山体效应分析   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
秦巴山地作为横亘在中国南北过渡带的巨大山脉,其山体效应对中国中部植被和气候的非地带性分布产生了重要的影响,山体内外同海拔的温差是表征山体效应大小较为理想的指标。本研究结合MODIS地表温度(LST)数据、STRM-1 DEM数据和秦巴山地的118个气象站点的观测数据,分别采用普通线性回归(OLS)和地理加权回归(GWR)两种分析方法对秦巴山地的气温进行估算,在此基础上将秦巴山地各月气温转换为同海拔(1500 m,秦巴山地平均海拔)气温,对比分析秦巴山地的山体效应。结果表明:① 相比OLS分析,GWR分析方法的精度更高,各月回归模型的R 2均在0.89以上,均方根误差(RMSE)在0.68~0.98 ℃之间。② 利用GWR估算得到的同海拔气温,从东向西随海拔升高呈现了明显的升高的趋势,秦岭西部山地比东段升高约6 ℃和4.5 ℃;大巴山西部山地年均和7月份同海拔的气温较东段升高约8 ℃和5 ℃。③ 从南向北,以汉江为分界,秦岭与大巴山的同海拔的气温均呈现出由山体边缘向内部升高的趋势。④ 秦巴山地西部大起伏高山,秦岭大起伏高中山和大巴山大起伏中山,相比豫西汉中中山谷地,各月均同海拔气温分别升高了约3.85~9.28 ℃、1.49~3.34 ℃和0.43~3.05 ℃,平均温差约为3.50 ℃,说明秦巴山地大起伏中高山的山体效应十分明显。  相似文献   

11.
等高线蕴含的历史高程信息可有效延长地形研究的时间序列,有利于深入挖掘地形变化长期规律,然而,图幅接边处的高程属性错误降低了等高线的数据质量,制约着等高线高程信息的实际应用。针对这一问题,该文提出一种基于层次格网索引的图幅接边处等高线高程错误识别和自动修正方法:首先,将层次格网索引与方向性二邻域算法相结合,以减少数据重复计算;然后,利用等高线空间位置标签及快速排序算法构建强空间位置关系,解决图幅接边处等高线匹配的准确性问题;最后,以高程冲突位点为驱动因子进行逻辑判断,实现等高线高程错误的识别及自动修正。实验结果表明:该方法运算效率较未进行效率优化时提高了203倍,接边处等高线高程错误识别与修正精度的最大值分别达97.71%和91.40%;相较于现有方法,该方法在精度和效率方面表现更佳,对区域性错误和变形等高线具有更高的适用性。  相似文献   

12.
The varied altitudinal gradient of climate and vegetation is further complicated by mass elevation effect (MEE), especially in high and extensive mountain regions. However, this effect and its implications for mountain altitudinal belts have not been well studied until recently. This paper provides an overview of the research carried out in the past 5 years. MEE is virtually the heating effect of mountain massifs and can be defined as the temperature difference on a given elevation between inside and outside of a mountain mass. It can be digitally modelled with three factors of intra-mountain base elevation (MBE), latitude and hygrometric continentality; MBE usually acts as the primary factor for the magnitude of MEE and, to a great extent, could represent MEE. MEE leads to higher treelines in the interior than in the outside of mountain masses. It makes montane forests to grow at 4800–4900 m and snowlines to develop at about 6000 m in the southern Tibetan Plateau and the central Andes, and large areas of forests to live above 3500 m in a lot of high mountains of the world. The altitudinal distribution of global treelines can be modelled with high precision when taking into account MEE and the result shows that MEE contributes the most to treeline distribution pattern. Without MEE, forests could only develop upmost to about 3500 m above sea level and the world ecological pattern would be much simpler. The quantification of MEE should be further improved with higher resolution data and its global implications are to be further revealed.  相似文献   

13.
为有效解决经纬度格网与四元三角网(Quaternary Triangular Mesh,QTM)在全球地形建模方面存在的不足,根据球面DQG(Degenerate Quadtree Grid)的几何结构特点,选择双线性多项式内插方法进行格网点高程内插,给出基于球面DQG的DEM建模算法与效率分析,并应用美国地质调查局提供的GTOPO30全球地形数据进行相关实验。结果表明:全球DEM建模时,DQG所需的格网数是经纬度格网或QTM的2/3左右,且可视化操作(图形放大、缩小及漫游等)时画面平滑、流畅,没有抖动。  相似文献   

14.
山体效应及其对林线分布的影响(英文)   总被引:7,自引:2,他引:5  
The concept of mass elevation effect(massenerhebungseffect,MEE) was intro-duced by A.de Quervain about 100 years ago to account for the observed tendency for temperature-related parameters such as tree line and snowline to occur at higher elevations in the central Alps than on their outer margins.It also has been widely observed in other ar-eas of the world,but there have not been significant,let alone quantitative,researches on this phenomenon.Especially,it has been usually completely neglected in developing fitting mod-els of timberline elevation,with only longitude or latitude considered as impacting factors.This paper tries to quantify the contribution of MEE to timberline elevation.Considering that the more extensive the land mass and especially the higher the mountain base in the interior of land mass,the greater the mass elevation effect,this paper takes mountain base elevation(MBE) as the magnitude of MEE.We collect 157 data points of timberline elevation,and use their latitude,longitude and MBE as independent variables to build a multiple linear regres-sion equation for timberline elevation in the southeastern Eurasian continent.The results turn out that the contribution of latitude,longitude and MBE to timberline altitude reach 25.11%,29.43%,and 45.46%,respectively.North of northern latitude 32°,the three factors’ contribu-tion amount to 48.50%,24.04%,and 27.46%,respectively;to the south,their contribution is 13.01%,48.33%,and 38.66%,respectively.This means that MBE,serving as a proxy indi-cator of MEE,is a significant factor determining the elevation of alpine timberline.Compared with other factors,it is more stable and independent in affecting timberline elevation.Of course,the magnitude of the actual MEE is certainly determined by other factors,including mountain area and height,the distance to the edge of a land mass,the structures of the mountains nearby.These factors need to be included in the study of MEE quantification in the future.This paper could help build up a high-accuracy and multi-scale elevation model for alpine timberline and even other altitudinal belts.  相似文献   

15.
Alpine timberline, as the "ecologica tion of scientists in many fields, especially in transition zone," has long attracted the atten- recent years. Many unitary and dibasic fitting models have been developed to explore the relationship between timberline elevation and latitude or temperature. However, these models are usually on regional scale and could not be applied to other regions; on the other hand, hemispherical-scale and continental-scale models are usually based on about 100 timberline data and are necessarily low in precision. The present article collects 516 data sites of timberline, and takes latitude, continentality and mass elevation effect (MEE) as independent variables and timberline elevation as dependent variable to develop a ternary linear regression meteorological data released by WorldClim and model. Continentality is calculated using the mountain base elevation (as a proxy of mass elevation effect) is extracted on the basis of SRTM 90-meter resolution elevation data. The results show that the coefficient of determination (R2) of the linear model is as high as 0.904, and that the contribution rate of latitude, continentality and MEE to timberline elevation is 45.02% (p=0.000), 6.04% (p=0.000) and 48.94% (p=0.000), respectively. This means that MEE is simply the primary factor contributing to the elevation distribution of timberline on the continental and hemispherical scales. The contribution rate of MEE to timberline altitude dif- fers in different regions, e.g., 50.49% (p=0.000) in North America, 48.73% (p=0.000) in the eastern Eurasia, and 43.6% (p=0.000) in the western Eurasia, but it is usually very high.  相似文献   

16.
Airborne LiDAR (light detection and ranging) data are now commonly regarded as the most accurate source of elevation data for medium-scale topographical modelling applications. However, quoted LiDAR elevation error may not necessarily represent the actual errors occurring across all surfaces, potentially impacting the reliability of derived predictions in Geographical Information Systems (GIS). The extent to which LiDAR elevation error varies in association with land cover, vegetation class and LiDAR data source is quantified relative to dual-frequency global positioning system survey data captured in a 400-ha area in Ireland, where four separate classes of LiDAR point data overlap. Quoted elevation errors are found to correspond closely with the minimum requirement recommended by the American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing for the definition of 95% error in urban areas only. Global elevation errors are found to be up to 5 times the quoted error, and errors within vegetation areas are found to be even larger, with errors in individual vegetation classes reaching up to 15 times the quoted error. Furthermore, a strong skew is noted in vegetated areas within all the LiDAR data sets tested, pushing errors in some cases to more than 25 times the quoted error. The skew observed suggests that an assumption of a normal error distribution is inappropriate in vegetated areas. The physical parameters that were found to affect elevation error most fundamentally were canopy depth, canopy density and granularity. Other factors observed to affect the degree to which actual errors deviate from quoted error included the primary use for which the data were acquired and the processing applied by data suppliers to meet these requirements.  相似文献   

17.
The smoothness of HASM   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
To smooth noises inherent in uniformly sampled dataset, the smoothness of high accuracy surface modeling (HASM) was explored, and a smoothing method of HASM (HASM-SM) was developed based on a penalized least squares method. The optimal smoothing parameter of HASM-SM was automatically obtained by means of the generalized cross-validation (GCV) method. For an efficient smoothing computation, discrete cosine transform was employed to solve the system of HASM-SM and to estimate the minimum GCV score, simultaneously. Two examples including a numerical test and a real-world example were employed to compare the smoothing ability of HASM-SM with that of GCV thin plate smoothing spline (TPS) and kriging. The numerical test indicated that the minimum GCV HASM-SM is averagely more accurate than TPS and kriging for noisy surface smoothing. The real-world example of smoothing a lidar-derived Digital Elevation Model (DEM) showed that HASM-SM has an obvious smoothing effect, which is on a par with TPS. In conclusion, HASM-SM provides an efficient tool for filtering noises in grid-based surfaces like remote sensing–derived images and DEMs.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号