共查询到17条相似文献，搜索用时 125 毫秒
1.
本文利用实际飞行的航空动态数据,以传统差分GPS解算结果作为参考,分析了GPS/GLONASS组合精密单点定位在航空动态测量中的应用。试验结果表明,当GPS观测卫星数较多(大于6颗)时,GPS/GLONASS组合对提高定位精度不明显,但可提高定位的可靠性,获得较小的PDOP值;当GPS观测卫星数少于4颗时,采用GPS/GLONASS组合系统仍可获得厘米级的定位结果,保证了动态测量的连续性。 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
在实现BDS/GPS/GLONASS组合精密单点定位的基础上,模拟多种遮挡环境;利用3个MGEX测站的数据进行三系统组合PPP试验;并在可见卫星数、PDOP值、定位精度、收敛时间和定位可用性等方面与GPS单系统PPP进行了比较分析。结果表明:在亚太地区,相比于GPS单系统PPP,三系统组合PPP可见卫星数增加了2~3倍,PDOP值显著减小。动态试验中,在无遮挡环境下,三系统组合PPP相较于GPS PPP收敛时间更短,且收敛后定位精度更高;在遮挡环境下,GPS PPP性能急剧下降,三系统组合PPP较好的保证了定位精度,提高了系统定位可用性。 相似文献
5.
董玉刚 《测绘与空间地理信息》2016,(9):98-101
介绍了GPS/GLONASS定位系统发展状况,在分析GPS单点定位数学模型的基础上,研究了GPS/GLONASS组合系统伪距单点定位的数学模型,编程实现了GPS/GLONASS组合系统伪距单点定位程序。分别比较GPS单系统、GLONASS单系统与GPS/GLONASS组合系统单天6 h伪距单点定位精度,结果表明,组合系统单点定位精度优于GPS单系统与GLONASS单系统结果。 相似文献
6.
文中在GPS精密单点定位（PPP）理论与方法的基础上,给出了多系统组合的精密单点定位技术观测模型,采用GPS、GLONASS、GALILEO、BDS 四大卫星导航定位系统的实测数据,研究并分析了四系统组合PPP的定位性能。结果表明,多系统PPP精度较单系统有很大提高,GPS+GLONASS+GALILEO+BDS四系统组合动态PPP在三个方向平均偏差约为0.7 cm、0.6 cm和1.7 cm,收敛时间为15～20 min左右,并且多系统PPP在截止高度角增大时,依然有充足的卫星数量,当截止高度角达到30°时,依然能达到cm级定位精度,对机载动态数据进行PPP解算结果显示,四系统组合解算的结果与利用GrafMov的解算结果符合得最好,优于其他双系统和单系统PPP的精度。 相似文献
7.
针对GNSS多系统组合进行PPP定位的问题,推导了GNSS观测值统一表达式;进而给出了基于UofC模型的多系统组合PPP的函数模型和随机模型;最后采用6个IGS观测站24 h观测数据对7种组合模型的PPP进行解算,并从收敛率、收敛速度和定位精度等方面进行了统计分析。实验结果表明,当观测时长为60 min时,GPS/GLONASS/BDS组合PPP收敛性能最好,收敛率为91.7%,平均收敛时间为16.1 min;而BDS PPP收敛性能最差,收敛率仅为32.7%,平均收敛时间为38.4 min。可见,多系统组合有利于提高精密单点定位的解算性能。对于定位精度,在观测时长较短时(如0.5 h),GPS/GLONASS/BDS组合PPP整体上具有最优的定位精度,(N,E)方向偏差和标准差分别为(0.3,0.5)cm和(1.9,4.3)cm;短时间内对流层参数与垂直方向的强相关性,将致使U方向精度较差。 相似文献
8.
9.
本文以高山峡谷地区以及城市建筑群区域GNSS卫星受山体及建筑物遮挡的实际问题为出发点,通过选取不同的卫星方位角模拟不同遮挡环境,研究GPS／BDS、GPS／GLONAS和GPS／BDS／GLONASS组合系统伪距单点定位模型对于单GPS、单BDS系统在不同遮挡环境下的定位精度和三维导航可用性等方面的改善情况。结果表明,组合系统相对于单系统,增加了可见卫星数,降低了PDOP值,当观测条件不佳时,可以很好地改善定位精度和提高三维导航可用性。 相似文献
10.
随着北斗卫星导航系统（BDS）于2012年底正式提供亚太地区区域性服务,研究BDS与其他卫星导航系统的组合定位尤为重要。本文主要分析BDS与GPS、GLONASS组合精密单点定位（PPP）,统一了三类卫星的时间系统和空间系统,给出了PPP非差组合模型,利用九峰站全天观测数据进行实验,得到初步结论：组合定位系统能够减少单系统的收敛时间;组合定位系统的定位精度比单系统的定位精度高。 相似文献
11.
A combination of GPS and GLONASS observations can offer improved reliability, availability and accuracy for precise point positioning (PPP). We present and analyze a combined GPS/GLONASS PPP model, including both functional and stochastic components. Numerical comparison and analysis are conducted with respect to PPP based on only GPS or GLONASS observations to demonstrate the benefits of the combined GPS/GLONASS PPP. The observation residuals are analyzed for more appropriate stochastic modeling for observations from different navigation systems. An analysis is also made using different precise orbit and clock products. The performance of the combined GPS/GLONASS PPP is assessed using both static and kinematic data. The results indicate that the convergence time can be significantly reduced with the addition of GLONASS data. The positioning accuracy, however, is not significantly improved by adding GLONASS data if there is a sufficient number of GPS satellites with good geometry. 相似文献
12.
利用码和载波相位观测值半和线性组合可以消除电离层一阶误差的特性,讨论了基于UofC消电离层组合的GPS/GLONASS精密单点定位的数学模型。UofC模型对两个频率上的模糊度参数分别进行估计,为进一步获得模糊度参数的整数解提供了便利。利用IGS跟踪站的GPS/GLONASS观测数据对UofC模型和传统的在两个频率码观测值间进行消电离层组合的模型进行了比较,统计结果表明,UofC模型与传统模型相比在平面位置定位精度上略有提高,但总体上差别不大。 相似文献
13.
GLONASS pseudorange inter-channel biases and their effects on combined GPS/GLONASS precise point positioning 总被引：6，自引：5，他引：1
Combined GPS/GLONASS precise point positioning (PPP) can obtain a more precise and reliable position than GPS PPP. However, because of frequency division multiple access, GLONASS carrier phase and pseudorange observations suffer from inter-channel biases (ICBs) which will influence the accuracy and convergence speed of combined GPS/GLONASS PPP. With clear understanding of the characteristics of carrier phase ICBs, we estimated undifferenced GLONASS pseudorange ICBs for 133 receivers from five manufacturers and analyzed their characteristics. In general, pseudorange ICBs corresponding to the same firmware have strong correlations. The ICB values of two receivers with the same firmware may be different because of different antenna types, and their differences are closely related to frequency. Pseudorange ICBs should be provided for each satellite to obtain more precise ICBs as the pseudorange ICBs may vary even on the same frequency. For the solutions of standard point positioning (SPP), after pseudorange ICB calibration, the mean root mean square (RMS) improvements of GLONASS SPP reach up to 57, 48, and 53 % for the East, North, and Up components, while combined GPS/GLONASS SPP reach up to 27, 17, and 23 %, respectively. The combined GPS/GLONASS PPP after pseudorange ICB calibration evidently improved the convergence speed, and the mean RMS of PPP improved by almost 50 % during the convergence period. 相似文献
14.
在GPS和GLONASS观测方程中考虑硬件延迟偏差的基础上,推导了GPS/GLONASS双系统组合精密单点定位的数学模型,并分析了硬件延迟偏差对估计的未知参数的影响。利用IGS跟踪站的观测数据和动态实验数据,对组合GPS/GLONASS精密单点定位模型进行了试算,并与GPS单系统精密单点定位的结果进行了比较。 相似文献
15.
Weiwei Song Wenting Yi Yidong Lou Chuang Shi Yibin Yao Yanyan Liu Yong Mao Yu Xiang 《GPS Solutions》2014,18(3):323-333
GLONASS carrier phase and pseudorange observations suffer from inter-channel biases (ICBs) because of frequency division multiple access (FDMA). Therefore, we analyze the effect of GLONASS pseudorange inter-channel biases on the GLONASS clock corrections. Different Analysis Centers (AC) eliminate the impact of GLONASS pseudorange ICBs in different ways. This leads to significant differences in the satellite and AC-specific offsets in the GLONASS clock corrections. Satellite and AC-specific offset differences are strongly correlated with frequency. Furthermore, the GLONASS pseudorange ICBs also leads to day-boundary jumps in the GLONASS clock corrections for the same analysis center between adjacent days. This in turn will influence the accuracy of the combined GPS/GLONASS precise point positioning (PPP) at the day-boundary. To solve these problems, a GNSS clock correction combination method based on the Kalman filter is proposed. During the combination, the AC-specific offsets and the satellite and AC-specific offsets can be estimated. The test results show the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed clock combination method. The combined clock corrections can effectively weaken the influence of clock day-boundary jumps on combined GPS/GLONASS kinematic PPP. Furthermore, these combined clock corrections can improve the accuracy of the combined GPS/GLONASS static PPP single-day solutions when compared to the accuracy of each analysis center alone. 相似文献
16.
BeiDou、Galileo、GLONASS、GPS多系统融合精密单点 总被引：2，自引：1，他引：1
随着中国BeiDou系统与欧盟Galileo系统的出现以及俄罗斯GLONASS系统的恢复完善,过去单一的GPS导航卫星系统时代已经逐步过渡为多系统并存且相互兼容的全球性卫星导航系统(multi-constellation global navigation satellite systems,multi-GNSS)时代,多系统GNSS融合精密定位将成为未来GNSS精密定位技术的发展趋势。本文采用GPS、GLONASS、BeiDou、Galileo 4大卫星导航定位系统融合的精密单点定位(precise point positioning,PPP)实测数据,初步研究并分析了4系统融合PPP的定位性能。试验结果表明:在单系统观测几何构型不理想的区域,多系统融合能显著提高PPP的定位精度和收敛速度。4大系统融合的PPP收敛速度相对于单GNSS可提高30%~50%,定位精度可提高10%~30%,特别是对高程方向的贡献更为明显。此外,在卫星截止高度角大于30°的观测环境下,单系统由于可见卫星数不足导致无法连续定位,而多系统融合仍然可以获得PPP定位结果,尤其是水平方向具有较高的定位精度。这对于山区、城市以及遮挡严重的区域具有非常重要的应用价值。 相似文献
17.
论文介绍了GPS/GLONASS组合静态相位相对定位模型,将GLONASS双差观测方程的模糊度参数表示成参考卫星的单差模糊度和双差模糊度参数;用误差分析法证明了单差模糊度按实参数估计不影响基线解算精度,而GLONASS双差模糊度必须按整参数进行解算;用Helmert方差分量估计确定GPS和GLONASS观测值的合理权比。实际观测数据处理结果表明：GPS/GLONASS组合定位较单一系统解算的基线精度均有提高,尤其比GLONASS单系统的解算精度有显著提高,比GPS单系统的精度也有适当提高,其中单历元基线解算精度约提高了10%,当单一系统的可用卫星数少于4颗时,GPS/GLONASS组合定位更具有应用价值。 相似文献