首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到17条相似文献,搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
不同于当前广泛使用的空域法、时域法、直接解法,本文尝试采用Torus方法处理GOCE实测数据,利用71 d的GOCE卫星引力梯度数据反演了200阶次GOCE地球重力场模型,实现了对参考模型的精化。首先,采用Butterworth零相移滤波方法加移去—恢复技术,处理引力梯度观测值中的有色噪声,并利用泰勒级数展开和Kriging方法对GOCE卫星引力梯度数据进行归算和格网化,计算得到了名义轨道上格网点处的引力梯度数据。然后,利用2D-FFT技术和块对角最小二乘方法处理名义轨道上数据,获得了200阶次的GOCE地球重力场模型GOCE_Torus。利用中国和美国的GPS/水准数据进行外部检核结果说明,GOCE_Torus与ESA发布的同期模型的精度相当;GOCE_Torus模型与200阶次的EGM2008模型相比,在美国区域精度相当,但在中国区域精度提高了4.6 cm,这充分体现了GOCE卫星观测数据对地面重力稀疏区的贡献。Torus方法拥有快速高精度反演卫星重力场模型的优势,可以在重力梯度卫星的设计、误差分析及在轨快速评估等方面得到充分应用。  相似文献   

2.
刘焕玲 《测绘学报》2018,47(9):1292-1292
正确定高精度高分辨率地球重力场模型是现代大地测量学的主要科学目标之一,对大地测量学、固体地球物理、海洋学等学科的研究和应用具有重要意义。目前利用GOCE卫星引力梯度数据解算卫星重力场模型的方法有直接法、时域法、空域法、张量不变量方法、Torus方法  相似文献   

3.
利用轨道扰动引力谱和大地水准面累计误差谱分析的方法估计未来GRACE(gravity recovery and climateexperiment)Follow-On卫星反演地球重力场的空间分辨率。基于GRACE Follow-On卫星的轨道特性,计算其在高空所受到的径向扰动引力,并根据谱特性及星载加速度计的测量噪声水平分析该卫星能反演重力场的阶数。利用EGM96重力场模型分别计算200 km和250 km轨道高度处的扰动引力谱。分析其特性表明:在两个轨道高度处分别能反演281阶和242阶的地球重力场模型。给出大地水准面累计误差谱模型,并计算200 km和250 km轨道高度处大地水准面累计误差谱。分析其谱特性表明:在两个轨道高度处分别能反演至286阶和228阶的地球重力场模型。  相似文献   

4.
本文论述了最小二乘过程中有色噪声的处理方法,提出使用AR模型对GOCE梯度观测值中的有色噪声进行时域滤波,数值模拟结果验证了该方法的有效性。利用数值模拟验证了直接求逆方法和PCCG法求解大型法方程的有效性,后者的效率远远高于前者。联合加入噪声(有色噪声和白噪声)的卫星重力梯度张量径向分量观测值Vzz和SST观测值,分别使用空域最小二乘法和SA方法恢复了180阶全球重力场模型,前者求解重力场模型的大地水准面和重力异常在180阶次的精度分别为3.01cm和0.75mGal,优于SA方法求解模型的精度。  相似文献   

5.
《测绘学报》2012,41(3)
利用轨道扰动引力谱和大地水准面累计误差谱分析的方法估计未来GRACE(gravity recovery and climate experimenl)Follow—On卫星反演地球重力场的空间分辨率。基于GRACEFollow—On卫星的轨道特性,计算其在高空所受到的径向扰动引力,并根据谱特性及星载加速度计的测量噪声水平分析该卫星能反演重力场的阶数。利用EGM96重力场模型分别计算200km和250km轨道高度处的扰动引力谱。分析其特性表明:在两个轨道高度处分别能反演281阶和242阶的地球重力场模型。给出大地水准面累计误差谱模型,并计算200km和250km轨道高度处大地水准面累计误差谱。分析其谱特性表明:在两个轨道高度处分别能反演至286阶和228阶的地球重力场模型。  相似文献   

6.
联合地球重力场和海洋环流探测器(Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Explorer,GOCE)和重力恢复与气候实验(Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment,GRACE)卫星观测数据确定全球静态重力场模型是当前大地测量学的研究热点之一。联合近3 a的GOCE卫星梯度数据和7 a左右的GRACE星间距离变率数据计算的ITG-GRACE2010S模型的法方程恢复了210阶次的重力场模型SWJTU-GOGR01S。采用带通数字滤波方法处理GOCE卫星的4个高精度梯度观测分量,利用梯度数据恢复重力场模型的观测方程直接建立在梯度仪坐标系中,可以避免坐标转换过程中高精度的梯度观测分量受低精度分量的影响;联合法方程解的最优权采用方差分量估计迭代计算,GOCE数据的两极空白引起的病态问题采用Kaula正则化方法进行约束。基于EIGEN-6C2模型和北美地区的GPS水准网观测数据,对SWJTU-GOGR01S模型进行内外符合精度分析,结果表明,SWJTU-GOGR01S模型在210阶次的大地水准面误差和累计误差分别为1.3 cm和5.7 cm,精度与欧洲空间局公布的第四代时域法模型相当,略优于GOCO02S和GOCO03S模型的精度。  相似文献   

7.
由CHAMP星载GPS相位双差数据解算地球引力场模型   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
利用7d的CHAMP星载GPS相位观测数据和48个IGS跟踪站的观测数据,构造星地双差相位观测量,进行GPS数据预处理;利用Cowell Ⅱ数值法进行轨道积分和分块Bayes最小二乘参数估计,解算了地球引力场位系数。该模型与EGM96相比(70阶次),大地水准面起伏差异最大为2.872m,差弄精度为0.522m,平均差异为-0.003m,这说明本文解算的地球重力场模型与EGM96没有系统性差异。  相似文献   

8.
利用GOCE卫星轨道反演地球重力场模型   总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0  
根据积分方程法反演地球重力场的数学模型,利用GOCE卫星2009-11-02~2010-01-02共61d的精密轨道数据反演了几组地球重力场模型。结果表明,GOCE卫星轨道能有效提取地球重力场的长波信息,弥补了GOCE卫星重力梯度带宽的限制,在106阶次的大地水准面误差为±9.6cm,该阶次精度优于EIGEN-CHAMP03S及GRACE卫星两个月轨道反演地球重力场的精度,但由于两极空白,反演的带谐位系数精度偏低。联合GOCE及GRACE卫星轨道反演的模型在106阶次的大地水准面误差为±6.9cm,弥补了GOCE卫星轨道的缺陷。  相似文献   

9.
采用星载GPS观测数据与简化动力学定轨方法,在方程中引入伪随机脉冲参数,从而实现对Swarm卫星的精密定轨. 详细分析了不同阶次的GOCO06s地球重力场模型对Swarm卫星简化动力学定轨精度的影响,对比了PGM2000a、EIGEN-2、EGM2008以及GECO重力场模型展开到100阶次时Swarm卫星解算的轨道精度. 结果表明:当GOCO06s地球重力场模型阶次处于30~100阶次时,Swarm-A、Swarm-B和Swarm-C卫星在径向、切向、法向上的定轨精度随着GOCO06s阶次的不断增加而越来越高,而在高于100阶次时,定轨精度基本稳定,且在各方向定轨精度优于3 cm. 此外,采用100阶次GECO、EGM2008和GOCO06s模型对三颗Swarm卫星进行定轨,解算的轨道精度相当,且要高于同阶次其他重力场模型的定轨结果.   相似文献   

10.
由GOCE引力梯度张量不变量确定卫星重力模型的半解析法   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
提出了利用半解析方法解算重力场与稳态海洋环流探测器(gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation explorer,GOCE)引力梯度张量不变量观测值来恢复全球卫星重力模型的方法,该方法比最小二乘方法效率高,同样可给出模型的验后方差。推导了半解析法快速解算引力梯度张量不变量的理论公式,给出了该方法利用卫星重力梯度观测数据快速求解重力场模型的基本步骤。利用89.5°倾角圆形严格重复轨道上的模拟梯度观测值验证了半解析方法用于张量不变量解算的理论严密性,并利用GOCE任务61d梯度仪坐标系(gradiometer reference frame,GRF)下无噪声和有噪声的I2和Vzz模拟观测值进行了模型反演和结果分析。结果表明,利用I_2观测值求解模型的精度略优于仅用Vzz分量解算模型的精度。  相似文献   

11.
重力梯度卫星GOCE通过搭载静电式重力梯度仪,将全球静态重力场恢复至200阶以上。目前GOCE卫星已结束寿命,亟须发展下一代更高分辨率的卫星重力梯度测量来完善200~360阶的全球静态重力场模型。原子干涉型的重力梯度测量在空间微重力环境下可获得较长的干涉时间,因此具有很高的星载测量精度,是下一代卫星重力梯度测量的候选技术之一。本文针对未来更高分辨率全球重力场测量的科学需求,提出了一种适用于空间微重力环境下的原子干涉重力梯度测量方案,其梯度测量噪声可低至0.85mE/Hz1/2。文中对不同类型的卫星重力梯度测量方案进行了重力场反演精度的对比评估,仿真结果表明,相比于现有静电式卫星重力梯度测量,原子干涉型的卫星重力梯度测量有望将重力场的恢复阶数提升至252~290阶,对应的累积大地水准面误差7~8cm,累积重力异常误差3×10-5 m/s2。  相似文献   

12.
The determination of local geoid models has traditionally been carried out on land and at sea using gravity anomaly and satellite altimetry data, while it will be aided by the data expected from satellite missions such as those from the Gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation explorer (GOCE). To assess the performance of heterogeneous data combination to local geoid determination, simulated data for the central Mediterranean Sea are analyzed. These data include marine and land gravity anomalies, altimetric sea surface heights, and GOCE observations processed with the space-wise approach. A spectral analysis of the aforementioned data shows their complementary character. GOCE data cover long wavelengths and account for the lack of such information from gravity anomalies. This is exploited for the estimation of local covariance function models, where it is seen that models computed with GOCE data and gravity anomaly empirical covariance functions perform better than models computed without GOCE data. The geoid is estimated by different data combinations and the results show that GOCE data improve the solutions for areas covered poorly with other data types, while also accounting for any long wavelength errors of the adopted reference model that exist even when the ground gravity data are dense. At sea, the altimetric data provide the dominant geoid information. However, the geoid accuracy is sensitive to orbit calibration errors and unmodeled sea surface topography (SST) effects. If such effects are present, the combination of GOCE and gravity anomaly data can improve the geoid accuracy. The present work also presents results from simulations for the recovery of the stationary SST, which show that the combination of geoid heights obtained from a spherical harmonic geopotential model derived from GOCE with satellite altimetry data can provide SST models with some centimeters of error. However, combining data from GOCE with gravity anomalies in a collocation approach can result in the estimation of a higher resolution geoid, more suitable for high resolution mean dynamic SST modeling. Such simulations can be performed toward the development and evaluation of SST recovery methods.  相似文献   

13.
GOCE采用的高低卫-卫跟踪和卫星重力梯度测量技术在恢复重力场方面各有所长并互为补充,如何有效利用这两类观测数据最优确定地球重力场是GOCE重力场反演的关键问题。本文研究了联合高低卫-卫跟踪和卫星重力梯度数据恢复地球重力场的最小二乘谱组合法,基于球谐分析方法推导并建立了卫星轨道面扰动位T和径向重力梯度Tzz、以及扰动位T和重力梯度分量组合{Tzz-Txx-Tyy}的谱组合计算模型与误差估计公式。数值模拟结果表明,谱组合计算模型可以有效顾及各类数据的精度和频谱特性进行最优联合求解。采用61天GOCE实测数据反演的两个180阶次地球重力场模型WHU_GOCE_SC01S(扰动位和径向重力梯度数据求解)和WHU_GOCE_SC02S(扰动位和重力梯度分量组合数据求解),结果显示后者精度优于前者,并且它们的整体精度优于GOCE时域解,而与GOCE空域解的精度接近,验证了谱组合法的可行性与有效性。  相似文献   

14.
First GOCE gravity field models derived by three different approaches   总被引:28,自引:10,他引:18  
Three gravity field models, parameterized in terms of spherical harmonic coefficients, have been computed from 71 days of GOCE (Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer) orbit and gradiometer data by applying independent gravity field processing methods. These gravity models are one major output of the European Space Agency (ESA) project GOCE High-level Processing Facility (HPF). The processing philosophies and architectures of these three complementary methods are presented and discussed, emphasizing the specific features of the three approaches. The resulting GOCE gravity field models, representing the first models containing the novel measurement type of gravity gradiometry ever computed, are analysed and assessed in detail. Together with the coefficient estimates, full variance-covariance matrices provide error information about the coefficient solutions. A comparison with state-of-the-art GRACE and combined gravity field models reveals the additional contribution of GOCE based on only 71 days of data. Compared with combined gravity field models, large deviations appear in regions where the terrestrial gravity data are known to be of low accuracy. The GOCE performance, assessed against the GRACE-only model ITG-Grace2010s, becomes superior at degree 150, and beyond. GOCE provides significant additional information of the global Earth gravity field, with an accuracy of the 2-month GOCE gravity field models of 10?cm in terms of geoid heights, and 3?mGal in terms of gravity anomalies, globally at a resolution of 100?km (degree/order 200).  相似文献   

15.
地球重力场和海洋环流探测(gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation explorer,GOCE)卫星重力梯度数据有色噪声和低频系统误差的滤波处理是反演高精度地球重力场的一个关键问题。针对GOCE卫星重力梯度数据的滤波处理,基于移动平均(moving average,MA)方法和CPR(circle per revolution)经验参数方法设计了两类低频系统误差滤波器,并分别将这两类滤波器与基于自回归移动平均(auto-regressive and moving average,ARMA)模型设计的有色噪声滤波器组合起来形成级联滤波器。为了分析滤波器处理的实际效果,基于空域最小二乘法采用70 d的GOCE观测数据,并联合重力恢复与气候实验(gravity recovery and climate experiment,GRACE)数据分别反演了224阶次的重力场模型GOGR-MA(MA+ARMA级联滤波)和GOGR-CPR(CPR+ARMA级联滤波)。将反演模型与采用同期数据求解的第一代GOCE系列模型及GOCE和GRACE联合模型GOCO01S进行比较,并通过高精度的全球定位系统水准数据和稳态海面地形模型进行检核,结果表明:构建的MA和CPR经验参数滤波器均能削弱低频系统误差的影响,并且后者效果更为明显,而ARMA去相关滤波器能够有效地对重力梯度数据有色噪声进行白化处理;反演的联合模型GOGR-MA和GOGR-CPR的精度接近,并且它们都优于欧空局采用同期数据研制的GOCO01S模型。反演结果验证了设计的级联滤波器的正确性和有效性,可为GOCE卫星重力梯度数据的滤波处理及高精度重力场反演提供参考。  相似文献   

16.
Three GOCE-based gravity field solutions have been computed by ESA’s high-level processing facility and were released to the user community. All models are accompanied by variance-covariance information resulting either from the least squares procedure or a Monte-Carlo approach. In order to obtain independent external quality parameters and to assess the current performance of these models, a set of independent tests based on satellite orbit determination and geoid comparisons is applied. Both test methods can be regarded as complementary because they either investigate the performance in the long wavelength spectral domain (orbit determination) or in the spatial domain (geoid comparisons). The test procedure was applied to the three GOCE gravity field solutions and to a number of selected pre-launch models for comparison. Orbit determination results suggest, that a pure GOCE gravity field model does not outperform the multi-year GRACE gravity field solutions. This was expected as GOCE is designed to improve the determination of the medium to high frequencies of the Earth gravity field (in the range of degree and order 50 to 200). Nevertheless, in case of an optimal combination of GOCE and GRACE data, orbit determination results should not deteriorate. So this validation procedure can also be used for testing the optimality of the approach adopted for producing combined GOCE and GRACE models. Results from geoid comparisons indicate that with the 2 months of GOCE data a significant improvement in the determination of the spherical harmonic spectrum of the global gravity field between degree 50 and 200 can be reached. Even though the ultimate mission goal has not yet been reached, especially due to the limited time span of used GOCE data (only 2 months), it was found that existing satellite-only gravity field models, which are based on 7 years of GRACE data, can already be enhanced in terms of spatial resolution. It is expected that with the accumulation of more GOCE data the gravity field model resolution and quality can be further enhanced, and the GOCE mission goal of 1–2 cm geoid accuracy with 100 km spatial resolution can be achieved.  相似文献   

17.
Improvements in height datum transfer expected from the GOCE mission   总被引:1,自引:1,他引:1  
 One of the aims of the Earth Explorer Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation (GOCE) mission is to provide global and regional models of the Earth's gravity field and of the geoid with high spatial resolution and accuracy. Using the GOCE error model, simulation studies were performed in order to estimate the accuracy of datum transfer in different areas of the Earth. The results showed that with the GOCE error model, the standard deviation of the height anomaly differences is about one order of magnitude better than the corresponding value with the EGM96 error model. As an example, the accuracy of the vertical datum transfer from the tide gauge of Amsterdam to New York was estimated equal to 57 cm when the EGM96 error model was used, while in the case of GOCE error model this accuracy was increased to 6 cm. The geoid undulation difference between the two places is about 76.5 m. Scaling the GOCE errors to the local gravity variance, the estimated accuracy varied between 3 and 7 cm, depending on the scaling model. Received: 1 March 2000 / Accepted: 21 February 2001  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号