首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   20篇
  免费   1篇
大气科学   4篇
地球物理   5篇
地质学   8篇
海洋学   2篇
天文学   1篇
自然地理   1篇
  2019年   1篇
  2018年   2篇
  2017年   4篇
  2016年   1篇
  2014年   1篇
  2012年   1篇
  2011年   4篇
  2009年   2篇
  2008年   3篇
  2007年   1篇
  1990年   1篇
排序方式: 共有21条查询结果,搜索用时 62 毫秒
21.
One of the important parameters in existing commercial dual-porosity reservoir simulators is matrix–fracture shape factor, which is customarily obtained by assuming a constant pressure at the matrix–fracture boundary. In his work, Chang [1] and [2] addressed the impact of boundary conditions at the matrix–fracture interface and presented analytical solutions for the transient shape factor and showed that for a slab-shaped matrix block a constant pressure boundary condition leads to an asymptotic (long-time) shape factor of π2/L2, and that a constant volumetric flux leads to an asymptotic shape factor of 12/L2. In a recent paper [3], we reconfirmed Chang’s [1] and [2] results using a Laplace transform approach. In this study, we extend our previous analysis and use infinite-acting radial and linear dual-porosity models, where the boundary condition is chosen at the wellbore, as opposed to at the matrix boundary. The coupled equations for fracture and matrix are solved analytically, taking into account the transient exchange between matrix and fracture. The analytical solution that invokes the time dependency of fracture boundary condition under constant rate is then used to calculate the transient shape factors. It is shown that, for a well producing at constant rate from a naturally fractured reservoir, the appropriate value of stabilized shape factor is 12/L2. This contrasts with the commonly used shape factor for a slab-shaped matrix block that is subject to a constant pressure boundary condition, which is π2/L2. The errors in the matrix–fracture exchange term in a dual-porosity model associated with the use of a shape factor derived based on constant pressure boundary condition at the matrix boundary are then evaluated.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号