鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界低压异常研究中应注意的几个问题   总被引：4，自引：3，他引：1  

尤欢增  李仲东  李良  惠宽洋  过敏  王震 《矿物岩石》2007,27(2):64-69

通过对鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界砂泥岩压实特征、压力成因的研究,结合上古生界不同岩性的组合关系分析,认为上古生界非烃源岩与烃源岩、砂岩和泥岩的地层压力成因有明显区别。非烃源岩系统泥岩的异常高压主要由“非均衡压实”作用产生;而生气作用是烃源岩增压的关键因素,同时也是上古生界天然气运移、成藏的主要动力源;砂岩与泥岩弹塑性有明显差别,构造抬升剥蚀成为砂岩降压的主要机理,而对泥岩影响有限,石千峰-上石盒子组非烃源岩目前仍具明显非均衡压实特征,多处于高压异常,而储层表现为低—正常压力,目前上古生界为一个高低压相间共存的复杂压力系统。上古生界压力的形成与演化历史表明,对于上古生界用流体势的高低来研究互不连通砂体之间的区域运移可能并不适宜。利用Berg临界烃类柱高度的公式计算,上古生界储层能引起天然气运移需要的最小连续气柱高度在22.07 m～67.36 m,远大于砂岩的单层厚度(5 m～15 m)。从天然气的生产能力、天然气聚集、成藏角度分析,山2段毛管中值压力平均值小于6.21MPa、砂岩厚度大于4 m以上的优质储层,才具有聚集、成藏和产出天然气能力,而排驱压力大、孔隙结构差、厚度小的砂岩,由于成藏动力小于成藏阻力,难于形成具规模的气层。  相似文献   

Late Triassic initial closure of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean in the western segment: Constraints from sedimentological,detrital zircon ages and paleomagnetic evidence     

《Gondwana Research》2024

The Mesozoic evolution of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean (MOO) has significantly affected the configuration of the modern Asian continent. Although a scissor-like closure of the MOO has long been proposed, when and how the MOO closed are still hotly debated, especially the timing of initial closure of the MOO in its western segment, hindering our understanding of both the evolution of the MOO and tectonics of the northern Asian continent. In order to uncover the timing of initial closure of the MOO, we performed a multidisciplinary study in sedimentology, detrital zircon U-Pb dating and paleomagnetic on the Late Triassic clastic strata from the Tarvagatay Block and the Amuria Block (AMB) on the both sides of the Mongol-Okhotsk Suture. The upper Triassic strata on both sides of the suture were dominated by plant fossil-bearing alluvial-fluvial facies sediments, which unconformably overlain pre-Triassic geological units, indicating a terrestrial setting after the closure of the MOO. Detrital zircon U-Pb dating results revealed consistent age distribution patterns for samples from both sides of the suture with a predominant peak at ∼253–251 Ma and a secondary peak at ∼359–357 Ma, representing two main arc magmatic events during the bidirectional subduction of the MOO in the Late Devonian-Early Carboniferous and Late Permian-Early Triassic. Coeval Late Triassic paleomagnetic poles were obtained from the northern AMB and Tarvagatay Block, revealing a comparable paleolatitude of the AMB (∼31–33°) and Tarvagatay Block (∼32–34°) in the Late Triassic, arguing for that the western segment of the MOO should have closed at the Late Triassic. The compilation of sedimentology, detrital zircon U-Pb dating, magmatic and paleomagnetic evidence provides integrated constraints on the Late Triassic initial closure of the MOO in its western segment.  相似文献