首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   215篇
  免费   9篇
  国内免费   23篇
测绘学   105篇
大气科学   4篇
地球物理   6篇
地质学   28篇
海洋学   9篇
天文学   1篇
综合类   40篇
自然地理   54篇
  2023年   2篇
  2022年   11篇
  2021年   6篇
  2020年   8篇
  2019年   6篇
  2018年   9篇
  2017年   15篇
  2016年   9篇
  2015年   14篇
  2014年   18篇
  2013年   30篇
  2012年   15篇
  2011年   16篇
  2010年   12篇
  2009年   10篇
  2008年   15篇
  2007年   17篇
  2006年   11篇
  2005年   8篇
  2004年   8篇
  2003年   1篇
  2001年   1篇
  2000年   1篇
  1996年   2篇
  1994年   1篇
  1991年   1篇
排序方式: 共有247条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
141.
地理信息科学是现代地理学与计算机信息科学之间的一个交叉学科,其主要理论、方法来源于这两门学科。随着地理信息科学自身的发展,"虚拟地球"的理念越来越被大家所关注。"虚拟地球"以基础地理信息数据为基础,集成了其它各学科的专题数据,大大地拓展了地理信息科学本学科的研究范围,吸引了众多的研究者投入到其中进行各类相关研究,产生大...  相似文献   
142.
地理知识包括客观地理存在和人们对地理的认知,对地理知识进行有效地组织和管理,实现语义级别的共享和重用,从而充分有效地利用地理知识是一项重要的研究课题。本体作为语义表达和信息共享的重要工具,可以详细描述地理知识的分类分级和语义信息。首先分析了地理知识的分类和本体的作用,然后分析了地理知识的来源,建立了地理本体,并构建了地...  相似文献   
143.
地名信息是基础地理信息的不可或缺的要素,是空间信息的重要载体,地名信息化建设是实现数字地球的基础和前提.文章通过考察地名的语言学、地理学、历史学特征,明确了地名的基本内涵.以此为基础建立地名本体基本框架,并以地名类型为例,分析了地名类型本体的基本语义关系及其表达方法;最后以地名本体为基础提出地名信息描述框架,并以实例说明了基于本体的地名信息描述方法,该方法为地名知识库的建立及应用提供了参考.  相似文献   
144.
Language plays a vital role in the communication, sharing and transmission of information among human beings. Geographical languages are essential for understanding, investigating, representing and propagating geo-spatial information. Geographical languages have developed and evolved gradually with improvements in science, technology and cognitive levels. Concerning the theoretical progress from geographical information ontology, epistemology and linguistic theory, this paper firstly puts forward the concept of a GIS language and discusses its basic characteristics according to changes in the structures, functions and characteristics of geographical languages. This GIS language can be regarded as a system of synthetic digital symbols. It is a comprehensive representation of geographical objects, phenomena and their spatial distributions and dynamic processes. This representation helps us generate a universal perception of geographical space using geographical scenarios or symbols with geometry, statuses, processes, spatio-temporal relationships, semantics and attributes. Furthermore, this paper states that the GIS language represents a new generation of geographical language due to its intrinsic characteristics, structures, functions and systematic content. Based on the aforementioned theoretical foundation, this paper illustrates the pivotal status and contributions of the GIS language from the perspective of geographical researchers. The language of GIS is a new geographical language designed for the current era, with features including spatio-temporal multi-dimension representation, interactive visualization, virtual geographical scenarios, multi-sensor perception and expedient broadcasting via the web. The GIS language is the highest-level geographical language developed to date, integrating semantic definitions, feature extraction, geographical dynamic representation and spatio-temporal factors and unifying the computation of geographical phenomena and objects. The GIS language possesses five important characteristics: abstraction, systematicness, strictness, precision and hierarchy. In summary, the GIS language provides a new means forpeople to recognize, understand and simulate entire geo-environments. Therefore, exploration of the GIS language’s functions in contemporary geographical developments is becoming increasingly important. Similarly, construction of the conceptual model and scientific systems of the GIS language will promote the development of the disciplines of geography and geographical information sciences. Therefore, this paper investigates the prospects of the GIS language from the perspectives of digital technology, geographical norms, geographical modeling and the disciplinary development of geography.  相似文献   
145.
The paper compares hydrographic and terrain categories in the geospatial data standards of the United States, Taiwan, and Russian Federation where the dominant languages used are from different language families. It aims to identify structural and semantic differences between similar categories across three geospatial data standards. By formalizing the data standard structures and identifying the properties that differentiate sibling categories in each geospatial data standard using well-known formal relations and quality universals, we develop a common basis on which hydrographic and terrain categories in the three data standards can be compared. The result suggests that all the three data standards structure categories with a mixture of relations even though most of them are well-known relations in top-level ontologies. Similar categories can be found across all the three standards. Cases of categories from different standards carrying identical meaning are rare. Partial overlaps in the meaning of the similar categories can be a direct result of different quality universals at work in defining and distinguishing these categories, or in the case of these categories being ordered by size, the threshold values for distinguishing the categories are ambiguous and language-dependent. Understanding these differences avoids incorrect mappings of categories in multilingual applications. More importantly, it provides a starting point for more effective mapping between hydrographic and terrain categories between English, Mandarin, and Russian.  相似文献   
146.
David M. Mark published his first journal article in 1970. Since then, he has written or coauthored more than 220 publications over a period of 40 years as of 28 May 2012. Based on data from Web of Science (WoS) and Google Scholar, Mark’s publications have been cited over 7410 times by researchers in more than 80 countries or regions as of 28 May 2012, when this paper was first prepared. The geographic extent of Mark’s scholarly influence is truly global. An examination of his 20 most cited articles reveals that his work in diverse areas as digital elevation models, geomorphology, geographic cognition, and ontology of the geospatial domain enjoyed a lasting impact worldwide.  相似文献   
147.
针对已有的地震检测机器学习模型训练所需的有标注的地震数据难以获取、处理成本高等问题,提出一种适用于小样本情况的地震检测机器学习新模型CCLSN。该模型联合使用连续小波时频变换和重新设计的轻量化卷积神经网络,可大幅降低训练所需的有标注的地震数据量,提高模型的适用性。实验结果表明,CCLSN仅用包含数百个地震样本的小型数据集,就可实现稳定和高精度的识别功能,精度和召回率均在98%以上。CCLSN可为我国中东部等少震弱震地区实现地震自动检测提供新的技术方法。  相似文献   
148.
149.
随着城乡一体化进程的深入,早期应用于土地调查、区别城市和农村地域所设计的两套系统已无法满足土地调查的需要.针对原有两套系统所出现的数据难以相互融合的问题,探讨了基于本体论来进行城乡一体化土地调查数据组织的思路,提出了本体论的几个概念与城乡一体化土地调查的对应关系,并讨论了如何建立本体以及利用本体的特点来解决土地调查数据...  相似文献   
150.
蔡晓梅  曹婧  刘俊 《地理学报》2022,77(10):2633-2649
在法国“五月风潮”和后现代主义思潮的影响下,拼装理论应运而生。该理论提出了以根茎思维为基础的动态生成哲学观,批判地揭露了现有研究以网络结构为主,忽视空间拓扑的局限,为人文地理学开辟了新的知识空间。一方面,拼装理论在“空间生产理论”“异托邦”和“第三空间”等空间理论的基础上形成“异质生成空间”,强调属性不同的元素互动的同时,更关注时空不断生成、变化的逻辑;另一方面,拼装理论重构了关系,强调“客体的能动性”和“外部联系”,生成“后关系本体论”,承认所有事物都是通过关系进行拼装的。随着拼装理论在人文地理领域的运用,现有的实证研究主要聚焦于政治拼装与流动性、城市拼装与批判城市化、日常生活拼装与非人的能动性,以及与行动者网络理论、复杂性理论的比较研究。为了阐述拼装理论的内涵,增强理论的应用性,本文以案例的形式详细解析了边界拼装蕴含的拼装逻辑。此外,基于拼装理论为人文地理学注入的过程逻辑与克服人类中心主义的理念,以及该理论特征与中国社会转型期的耦合性,期望国内地理学者能批判地运用拼装理论解释中国情境,以便推动中国人文地理学理论与哲学方法论的多元发展。  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号