排序方式： 共有44条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
41.
地震台阵常用频率-波数分析法来估计地震信号的后方位角和慢度。尽管有关的算法是众所周知的,但不同的实现在某些情况下可能导致不同的结果。如应用在宽频带的澳大利亚WRA台阵的记录时,标准的f-k分析方法往往给出不正确的结果。本文发现错误是由FFT的频谱泄漏效应引起的,如在进行FFT之前对原始数据进行高通滤波则可以有效地避免这样的错误。进一步对在时域中直接估算信号方位角和慢度的一种算法进行了分析,比较发现时域方法的计算速度和精度都不低于频域方法,且在某些低信噪比的情况下,前者可以给出更可靠的结果。 相似文献
42.
A multi-event and multi-station inverse method is presented in the paper to simultaneously estimate the seismicmoments (Mo) and source comer frequencies (fc) of several Jiashi (Xinjiang, China) earthquakes, as well as theapparent Lg Q models for the paths from Jiashi to eight seismic stations (WMQ, AAK, TLG MAKZ, KUR, VOS,ZRN and CHK) in Central Asia. The resultant seismic moments correlate well with the Mo values obtained by Harvard University using the centroid moment tensor (CMT) inversion and the surface-wave magnitudes as well. Afterthe correction by a typical value of average radiation coefficient for regional SV waves, the Mo values from Lgspectral inversion are still close to the corresponding values obtained from CMT inversion. The obtained apparentQOLg values (Lg Q at 1 Hz) are consistent with the tectonic features of corresponding propagation paths. The QoLgvalues are 351±87, 349±86 and 300±27 for the paths from Jiashi to AAK, TLG and MAKZ, respectively. They aresmaller than QoLg values for the paths to KUR, VOS, ZRN and CHK, which are 553±72, 569±58, 550±57 and603±65, respectively. These results agree with the condition that the paths to AAK, TLG and MAKZ mainlypropagate through the mountainous Tianshan area where relatively strong seismic activities and large variations oftopography are exhibited, while the paths to KUR, VOS, ZRN and CHK mainly propagate through the stable areaof Kazak platform. The QoLg value for the path to WMQ is 462±56. This is also in agreement with the conditionthat the path to WMQ is basically along the border area between Tianshan Mountain and Tarim Basin, and alongthis path the variations of topography and crustal thickness are moderate in comparison with that along the path toMAKZ. 相似文献
43.
根据禁核试核查国际监测系统中的USRK及KSRS台阵的实际记录数据,统计建立了这两个台阵的本底噪声水平分布概率模型。基于地下爆炸的源频谱模型及比例关系,对2009年5月25日朝鲜核试验在这两个地震台阵上的实际记录信号幅值进行了比例折算,得到了更小震级的“朝鲜地下核试验”在这两个地震台阵上的多频带信号幅值。在3倍信噪比检测条件下,利用概率模型法分别得到了这两个地震台阵对朝鲜地下核试验场小震级地下核试验的多频带信号检测能力。结果表明,震中距在400 km左右的两台阵对朝鲜地下核试验地震信号的检测阈值均随着频率的升高而逐渐降低,即高频段的检测能力强于低频段。这两个地震台阵的最高信号检测能力均出现在6.0—9.0 Hz频带,90%检测概率条件下,USRK和KSRS在该频带的检测阈值分别为mb1.5和mb2.2。 相似文献
44.
2016年1月6日,朝鲜再次进行了地下核试验.和上次2013核试验相比,此次试验震中位置接近,不同震相的平均幅值比却表现出明显的差异：在短周期P波幅值减小的情况下,长周期Rayleigh面波幅值增强,Love面波幅值减小.这给判断两次试验当量的相对大小带来了困难.本文在给出两次试验短周期P波和长周期面波幅值比测量结果的基础上,从地下核爆炸震源机制的角度对观测现象进行分析解释.研究结果表明,虽然各种形式的构造应力源都可以很好地拟合单次试验的长周期面波资料,但只有逆断层形式的构造应力释放能够解释两次试验不同震相幅值比差异现象.这是关于朝鲜核试验震源机制的一个新的发现,对于认识其震源性质具有重要意义. 相似文献