排序方式： 共有18条查询结果，搜索用时 34 毫秒
1.
微地震事件初至拾取是井下微地震监测数据处理的关键步骤之一.初至误差的存在会使微地震震源定位结果产生较大偏差,进而影响后续的压裂裂缝解释.通常初至拾取过程对所有的微地震事件选择相同的特征函数并采用一致的拾取参数进行统一处理,然而当事件的能量、震源机制、传播路径以及背景噪声等存在明显差异时,所得初至拾取结果差别显著.为了提高微地震事件初至拾取标准一致性,本文提出基于波形相似特征的初至拾取及全局校正方法.该方法首先利用互相关函数对每个事件内的各道记录进行时差校正,得到初始初至信息并形成叠加道,再对所有事件的叠加道进行全局互相关得到事件间初至相对校正量,最终初至结果可以通过各个事件的初始初至信息与其相对校正量相加得到.方法将所有微地震事件初至结果作为一个整体处理,从而能够克服常规方法初至拾取标准一致性差的缺陷.实际资料处理结果表明,相比于常规方法,该方法可以有效提高事件初至拾取和定位结果的一致性. 相似文献
2.
Tijmen Jan Moser 《Geophysical Prospecting》2014,62(3):475-490
We study the stability of source mechanisms inverted from data acquired at surface and near‐surface monitoring arrays. The study is focused on P‐wave data acquired on vertical components, as this is the most common type of acquisition. We apply ray modelling on three models: a fully homogeneous isotropic model, a laterally homogeneous isotropic model and a laterally homogeneous anisotropic model to simulate three commonly used models in inversion. We use geometries of real arrays, one consisting in surface receivers and one consisting in ‘buried’ geophones at the near‐surface. Stability was tested for two of the frequently observed source mechanisms: strike‐slip and dip‐slip and was evaluated by comparing the parameters of correct and inverted mechanisms. We assume these double‐couple source mechanisms and use quantitatively the inversion allowing non‐double‐couple components to measure stability of the inversion. To test the robustness we inverted synthetic amplitudes computed for a laterally homogeneous isotropic model and contaminated with noise using a fully homogeneous model in the inversion. Analogously amplitudes computed in a laterally homogeneous anisotropic model were inverted in all three models. We show that a star‐like surface acquisition array provides very stable inversion up to a very high level of noise in data. Furthermore, we reveal that strike‐slip inversion is more stable than dip‐slip inversion for the receiver geometries considered here. We show that noise and an incorrect velocity model may result in narrow bands of source mechanisms in Hudson's plots. 相似文献
3.
Leo Eisner B. J. Hulsey Peter Duncan Dana Jurick Heigl Werner William Keller 《Geophysical Prospecting》2010,58(5):809-820
Monitoring of induced microseismic events has become an important tool in hydraulic fracture diagnostics and understanding fractured reservoirs in general. We compare microseismic event and their uncertainties using data sets obtained with surface and downhole arrays of receivers. We first model the uncertainties to understand the effect of different acquisition geometries on location accuracy. For a vertical array of receivers in a single monitoring borehole, we find that the largest part of the final location uncertainty is related to estimation of the backazimuth. This is followed by uncertainty in the vertical position and radial distance from the receivers. For surface monitoring, the largest uncertainty lies in the vertical position due to the use of only a single phase (usually P‐wave) in the estimation of the event location. In surface monitoring results, lateral positions are estimated robustly and are not sensitive to the velocity model. In this case study, we compare event location solutions from two catalogues of microseismic events; one from a downhole array and the second from a surface array of 1C geophone. Our results show that origin time can be reliably used to find matching events between the downhole and surface catalogues. The locations of the corresponding events display a systematic shift consistent with a poorly calibrated velocity model for downhole dataset. For this case study, locations derived from surface monitoring have less scatter in both vertical and horizontal directions. 相似文献
4.
煤矿冲击地压的微地震监测研究 总被引：60，自引：7，他引：53
为了研究煤矿冲击地压与岩层在三维空间破裂之间的关系，进而探索依据岩层破裂规律预测和预报冲击地压的可能性，文中采用自行研制的防爆型微地震定位监测（MS）系统，基于定位原理，监测了山东华丰煤矿冲击地压煤层（四层煤）及其解放层（六层煤）开采过程中的岩层破裂过程和二次应力场分布变化的过程，得到了如下结论：冲击地压的发生与岩层破裂密切相关，四层煤下顺槽处于六层煤顶板破裂区的外边缘时，正处于高应力区内，在此处掘进容易引发冲击地压，必须将六层煤下顺槽位置向实体煤侧移动20 m以上，或将四层煤下顺槽位置内移20 m以上，才能消除四层煤的冲击地压；六层煤和四层煤开采时，工作面前方断层活化的距离分别为250 m和350 m左右，根据这一距离，及时对断层带进行卸压处理，可以消除由断层带引发的冲击地压；监测显示了工作面周围岩层的三维破裂形态和范围，为矿井确定防水煤柱的高度提供了可靠的依据；监测证明了厚层砾岩的破裂、断层活化、采场附近关键层的破裂是引起冲击地压的主要原因，证明了所研制的硬件和定位软件具有较高的精度和实用性，可以在煤矿和边坡、隧道等领域应用. 相似文献
5.
Cross double‐difference inversion for simultaneous velocity model update and microseismic event location 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 Microseismic monitoring is an approach for mapping hydraulic fracturing. Detecting the accurate locations of microseismic events relies on an accurate velocity model. The one‐dimensional layered velocity model is generally obtained by model calibration from inverting perforation data. However, perforation shots may only illuminate the layers between the perforation shots and the recording receivers with limited raypath coverage in a downhole monitoring problem. Some of the microseismic events may occur outside of the depth range of these layers. To derive an accurate velocity model covering all of the microseismic events and locating events at the same time, we apply the cross double‐difference method for the simultaneous inversion of a velocity model and event locations using both perforation shots and microseismic data. The cross double‐difference method could provide accurate locations in both the relative and absolute sense, utilizing cross traveltime differences between P and S phases over different events. At the downhole monitoring scale, the number of cross traveltime differences is sufficiently large to constrain events locations and velocity model as well. In this study, we assume that the layer thickness is known, and velocities of P‐ and S‐wave are inverted. Different simultaneous inversion methods based on the Geiger's, double‐difference, and cross double‐difference algorithms have been compared with the same input data. Synthetic and field data experiments suggest that combining both perforation shots and microseismic data for the simultaneous cross double‐difference inversion of the velocity model and event locations is available for overcoming the trade‐offs in solutions and producing reliable results. 相似文献
6.
研究微地震的震源机制，获得压裂区域的破裂方向、尺度和应力状态等信息，在非常规油气开采过程中具有重要意义.对于微震，通常采用剪切位错或者矩张量模型对震源进行描述.本文从其实际发震机制出发，使用了"剪切+张裂"的一般位错点源模型，并基于此模型发展了一种利用全波形信息，通过波形振幅谱相关和初至约束，在频率域求解微震震源机制的方法.该方法适用于地面和井中观测，能够在得到常规震源参数（断层走向、倾角和滑动角）的同时给出裂缝断层剪切和张裂错动的距离信息，更直观体现破裂程度.理论数值测试证明方法有效、可行，在未滤波的情况下，实际数据的波形拟和结果仍较为一致，同时还发现错动距离与应力降等常规破裂参数并不严格相关，说明剪切、张裂错距可作为独立的新参数来定量评估水压致裂效果，指导工程开发进行. 相似文献
7.
8.
深井高应力、高岩压诱发的冒顶、片帮、塌方、岩爆等地压灾害严重影响了矿山安全生产。随着高精度、高采样率传感器的研发和计算机技术的飞速发展,微震高精度实时监测技术不断完善,微震监测已成为矿山地压灾害监测预警的重要手段。通过设计、研发完全自主知识产权的BSN(BGRIMM Seismic Network)微震监测系统,实现了微震信号数据采集、多通道时钟同步、噪声压制、到时自动拾取、震源定位等功能,并结合统计地震学的相关方法,初步实现了基于微震活动性分析的岩体危险性评价。本文主要从矿山微震监测数据采集、预处理、定位、活动性分析等模块介绍BSN微震监测系统全流程,并对监测系统在广西某矿山的实际应用案例进行分析。 相似文献
9.
针对波速分层的区域岩体,在异向波速模型的基础上,对垂向上的应力波按岩体波速值大小作分段区别,推导震源应力波走时关系式,建立分层速度定位目标函数,基于此提出一种由参数准备、层速度反演、微震定位三个模块组成的分层速度定位模型SV,并采用遗传算法进行优化求解.然后,对分层速度定位模型在已构建微震监测系统的白鹤滩水电站左岸岩质边坡进行验证.微震事件重定位结果表明,分层速度定位模型定位微震事件的最大、最小和平均偏离层内错动带程度指标较单一速度模型分别降低了57.17%、36.51%和57.35%,证明了定位模型在波速分层的区域岩体微震定位应用中比单一速度定位模型更加合理可靠. 相似文献
10.
Measuring changes in fracture properties from temporal variations in anisotropic attenuation of microseismic waveforms 下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 We investigate fracture‐induced attenuation anisotropy in a cluster of events from a microseismic dataset acquired during hydraulic fracture stimulation. The dataset contains 888 events of magnitude ?3.0 to 0.0. We use a log‐spectral‐amplitude‐ratio method to estimate change in over a half‐hour time period where fluid is being injected and an increase in fracturing from S‐wave splitting analysis has been previously inferred. A Pearson's correlation analysis is used to assess whether or not changes in attenuation with time are statistically significant. P‐waves show no systematic change in during this time. In contrast, S‐waves polarised perpendicular to the fractures show a clear and statistically significant increase with time, whereas S‐waves polarised parallel to the fractures show a weak negative trend. We also compare between the two S‐waves, finding an increase in with time. A poroelastic rock physics model of fracture‐induced attenuation anisotropy is used to interpret the results. This model suggests that the observed changes in t* are related to an increase in fracture density of up to 0.04. This is much higher than previous estimates of 0.025 ± 0.002 based on S‐wave velocity anisotropy, but there is considerably more scatter in the attenuation measurements. This could be due to the added sensitivity of attenuation measurement to non‐aligned fractures, fracture shape, and fluid properties. Nevertheless, this pilot study shows that attenuation measurements are sensitive to fracture properties such as fracture density and aspect ratio. 相似文献