排序方式： 共有4条查询结果，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1
1.
Doklady Earth Sciences - Deju basalts is a characteristic volcanic association and was first founded in the 1 : 50 000 regional geological survey. There is no previous... 相似文献
2.
Yi-Ming Wei Rong Han Qiao-Mei Liang Bi-Ying Yu Yun-Fei Yao Mei-Mei Xue Kun Zhang Li-Jing Liu Juan Peng Pu Yang Zhi-Fu Mi Yun-Fei Du Ce Wang Jun-Jie Chang Qian-Ru Yang Zili Yang Xueli Shi Wei Xie Changyi Liu Zhongyu Ma Jinxiao Tan Weizheng Wang Bao-Jun Tang Yun-Fei Cao Mingquan Wang Jin-Wei Wang Jia-Ning Kang Ke Wang Hua Liao 《Natural Hazards》2018,92(2):585-618
A series of global actions have been made to address climate change. As a recent developed climate policy, Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDC) have renewed attention to the importance of exploring temperature rise levels lower than 2 °C, in particular a long-term limit of 1.5 °C, compared to the preindustrial level. Nonetheless, achieving the 2 °C target under the current INDCs depends on dynamic socioeconomic development pathways. Therefore, this study conducts an integrated assessment of INDCs by taking into account different Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs). To that end, the CEEP-BIT research community develops the China’s Climate Change Integrated Assessment Model (C3IAM) to assess the climate change under SSPs in the context of with and without INDCs. Three SSPs, including “a green growth strategy” (SSP1), “a more middle-of-the-road development pattern” (SSP2) and “further fragmentation between regions” (SSP3) form the focus of this study. Results show that after considering INDCs, mitigation costs become very low and they have no evident positive changes in three SSPs. In 2100, a temperature rise would occur in SSP1-3, which is 3.20, 3.48 and 3.59 °C, respectively. There are long-term difficulties to keep warming well below 2 °C and pursue efforts toward 1.5 °C target even under INDCs. A drastic reduction in greenhouse gas emissions is needed in order to mitigate potentially catastrophic climate change impacts. This work contributes on realizing the hard link between the earth and socioeconomic systems, as well as extending the economic models by coupling the global CGE model with the economic optimum growth model. In C3IAM, China’s energy consumption and emissions pattern are investigated and refined. This study can provide policy makers and the public a better understanding about pathways through which different scenarios could unfold toward 2100, highlights the real mitigation and adaption challenges faced by climate change and can lead to formulating effective policies. 相似文献
3.
南海莺歌海盆地内地层普遍发育超压,东方区和乐东区是莺歌海盆地天然气成藏有利区的核心地带。其中,东方区位于底辟带中心,超压形成时间较早(9—5 Ma),主要物源来自西部昆嵩隆起区;乐东区位于莺东斜坡带,超压形成时间较晚(5—2 Ma),主要物源区为东部海南隆起区。本研究通过铸体薄片、荧光薄片、扫描电镜、电子探针、含烃包裹体微束荧光分析、流体包裹体激光拉曼成分与均一温度、X射线衍射黏土矿物等分析测试研究方法,对东方区和乐东区超压背景下黄流组砂岩储集层的岩石学与物性特征、烃类充注与成岩作用特征进行对比分析。结果显示: (1)东方区黄流组砂岩的压实作用、胶结作用较弱,物性较好(平均孔隙度17.68%,平均渗透率11.11×10-3 μm2),处于中成岩A期晚期;乐东区黄流组砂岩整体压实作用、胶结作用较强,物性较差(平均孔隙度8.94%,平均渗透率1.52×10-3 μm2),处于中成岩B期。(2)研究区储集层物性主要受沉积作用、超压背景和成岩作用的控制。物源、沉积中心与沉降中心、沉积相类型,超压形成时间和烃类充注规模共同影响了储集层的成岩作用特征及成岩—孔隙演化过程。(3)超压在一定程度上抵抗了压实作用强度,抑制了胶结作用,促进了溶蚀作用。 相似文献
4.
南海莺歌海盆地内地层普遍发育超压,东方区和乐东区是莺歌海盆地天然气成藏有利区的核心地带。其中,东方区位于底辟带中心,超压形成时间较早(9—5 Ma),主要物源来自西部昆嵩隆起区;乐东区位于莺东斜坡带,超压形成时间较晚(5—2 Ma),主要物源区为东部海南隆起区。本研究通过铸体薄片、荧光薄片、扫描电镜、电子探针、含烃包裹体微束荧光分析、流体包裹体激光拉曼成分与均一温度、X射线衍射黏土矿物等分析测试研究方法,对东方区和乐东区超压背景下黄流组砂岩储集层的岩石学与物性特征、烃类充注与成岩作用特征进行对比分析。结果显示: (1)东方区黄流组砂岩的压实作用、胶结作用较弱,物性较好(平均孔隙度17.68%,平均渗透率11.11×10-3 μm2),处于中成岩A期晚期;乐东区黄流组砂岩整体压实作用、胶结作用较强,物性较差(平均孔隙度8.94%,平均渗透率1.52×10-3 μm2),处于中成岩B期。(2)研究区储集层物性主要受沉积作用、超压背景和成岩作用的控制。物源、沉积中心与沉降中心、沉积相类型,超压形成时间和烃类充注规模共同影响了储集层的成岩作用特征及成岩—孔隙演化过程。(3)超压在一定程度上抵抗了压实作用强度,抑制了胶结作用,促进了溶蚀作用。 相似文献
1