排序方式： 共有5条查询结果，搜索用时 140 毫秒
1
1.
创建统一的中华国家公园体系——美国历史经验的启示 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
以近10年研究中美两国国家公园体系建设的成果为基础,结合近期的实地考察,应用历史比较研究方法,分析了中美两国的国家公园体系发展与演进。全面探讨了美国国家公园体系的演变,以及从19世纪70年代积累下来的重要经验,展示了美国政府如何将401个具有多元性格的公园单位组建为一个具有内生凝聚力的国家公园体系的过程。运用比较研究方法,剖析了在从"全球半开放"到"全球开放"的过程中,中国政府如何致力于建构和应用国家公园新概念,并在多个部门之间形成了分散而具有异质特征的公园管理体制。从早期开始,中国的公园体系就有了全然不同的命名框架和管理政策,其结果是在不同机构之间衍生出不同的管理目标和政策重点。建议学术界与政府共同努力,认真研讨如何尽早创立一个趋向统一而具有民族凝聚力的中华国家公园体系。 相似文献
2.
3.
王连勇 《地理学报(英文版)》2007,17(2):187-196
The author selects a thorny issue of doubled designations that bother policy-makers, professional planners and managers in the field of conservation for protected areas. The analyzed case study areas cover 5 National Geoparks of China in Sichuan Province, 18 UNESCO Global Geoparks in China, and 219 World Heritage sites in China and 8 European nations. Through analysis and synthesis, the author concludes that doubled designation, which also leads to unbalanced park distribution, is particularly prevalent in China other than in Europe. Therefore, on-site management agencies and related governments in China should carefully translate the doubled designations into responsibilities and harmonious partnerships between all stakeholders in order to enhance the management effectiveness and avoid paper park phenomenon. 相似文献
4.
也许只有很少的人才知道,加拿大于1911年组建了世界上最早的国家级公园管理机构——国家公园局。正是世界各国超越边界的交流、学习和合作,推动了以国家公园运动为代表的浪漫自然保护事业呈全球规模的扩展。 相似文献
5.
探索国家公园体系的多元化世界——全球背景里的中国前景(英文) 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
A single nomenclature for national park terminology has evolved into a massive global data network from information gathered together from the past 140 years.This has been created using the most recent UNEP-WDPA data and its 98483 national designation records from 192 countries,two other customized databases accommodating 2638 records of officially designated national parks from 184 jurisdictions around the globe,and 2064 records of extended Chinese national park sites.However,mushrooming designations and growing databases are posing significant challenges even though the IUCN and UNEP have both devoted efforts to build and promote a common language called the "System of Management Categories for Protected Areas".Thus conversely the best possible outcome and the worst confusion might have originated from the same objective that is known by the simple moniker as a national park.This is why much more work needs to be done to enhance communication among different stakeholders from the world.In this paper,the authors are intending to demonstrate that China’s government agencies should boost a dialogue with the UNEP-WDPA operating staff in order that the current innovative national park programs are recognized by the global community.Meanwhile,the authors also recommend that IUCN needs to revise and refresh the current protected area classification system for the purpose of effectively servicing the diverse stakeholders in such a diversified world of national park systems around the globe. 相似文献
1