排序方式： 共有3条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
古气候模拟比较计划（PMIP）是古气候数值模拟领域一项重大的国际合作研究计划,其主旨是为古气候模拟和模拟结果评估提供一个协调机制,理解过去气候变化的物理机制和气候反馈的重要作用,为未来气候预估提供科学依据。同时,通过对比分析验证模式的模拟性能,探索其不确定性,促进耦合气候系统模式的发展。PMIP目前进行到第四阶段（PMIP4)。PMIP4进一步加强了与第六次国际耦合模式比较计划（CMIP6）的协作,选取了5组共同关注的PMIP4-CMIP6古气候模拟试验（中全新世、末次盛冰期、过去千年、末次间冰期和上新世暖期),考察气候系统对不同气候背景的综合响应。除此以外,PMIP4还设计了众多敏感性试验研究不同外强迫因子的影响。PMIP4模拟试验不仅为古气候研究提供大量的模拟数据,还将服务于CMIP6及其他众多模式比较计划。 相似文献
2.
当今气候系统模式发展的重要趋势之一,是通过提高模式的空间分辨率,改进对气候系统中多尺度相互作用过程和极端事件的模拟能力。过去5年里,中国科学院大气物理研究所发展并完善了25 km分辨率大气环流分量模式FAMIL2.2、1/10°分辨率海洋环流分量模式LICOM3.0,并以此为基础建立了高分辨率气候系统模式FGOALS-f3-H。利用上述高分辨率模式,开展了大量的数值模拟试验和预报/预测研究,其中包括国际耦合模式比较计划第六阶段（CMIP6）的高分辨率模式比较子计划（HighResMIP）,建立了海洋环流预测系统（LFS）等。初步评估分析表明,相对于低分辨率模式,高分辨率模式对气候平均态和气候变率的模拟能力均有明显改进。其中高分辨率大气环流模式可以更好地模拟台风、极端降水事件,高分辨率海洋模式可以更好地模拟海洋中尺度涡旋和西边界流,而高分辨率耦合模式则可以更好重现中尺度海气相互作用过程、热带不稳定波动（TIW）等事件。 相似文献
3.
The seasonal cycle and interannual variability in the tropical oceans simulated by three versions of the Flexible Ocean-Atmosphere-Land System (FGOALS) model (FGOALS-g1.0, FGOALS-g2 and FGOALSs2), which have participated in phases 3 and 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP3 and CMIP5), are presented in this paper. The seasonal cycle of SST in the tropical Pacific is realistically reproduced by FGOALS-g2 and FGOALSs2, while it is poorly simulated in FGOALS-g1.0. Three feedback mechanisms responsible for the SST annual cycle in the eastern Pacific are evaluated. The ocean-atmosphere dynamic feedback, which is successfully reproduced by both FGOALS-g2 and FGOALS-s2, plays a key role in determining the SST annual cycle, while the overestimated stratus cloud-SST feedback amplifies the annual cycle in FGOALS-s2. Because of the serious warm bias existing in FGOALS-g1.0, the ocean-atmosphere dynamic feedback is greatly underestimated in FGOALS-g1.0, in which the SST annual cycle is mainly driven by surface solar radiation. FGOALS-g1.0 simulates much stronger ENSO events than observed, whereas FGOALS-g2 and FGOALSs2 successfully simulate the observed ENSO amplitude and period and positive asymmetry, but with less strength. Further ENSO feedback analyses suggest that surface solar radiation feedback is principally responsible for the overestimated ENSO amplitude in FGOALS-g1.0. Both FGOALS-g1.0 and FGOALS-s2 can simulate two different types of El Ni-no events — with maximum SST anomalies in the eastern Pacific (EP) or in the central Pacific (CP) — but FGOALS-g2 is only able to simulate EP El Ni-no, because the negative cloud shortwave forcing feedback by FGOALS-g2 is much stronger than observed in the central Pacific. 相似文献
1