排序方式： 共有2条查询结果，搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
内蒙古宝格达乌拉钼(钨)矿区花岗岩锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年龄及地质意义 总被引：4，自引：2，他引：2
本文首次对新发现的宝格达乌拉钼(钨)矿区中含矿花岗岩的锆石进行了SHRIMP U-Pb定年,获得9个锆石颗粒的206Pb/238U年龄的加权平均值为240.9±2.5Ma,MSW值为1.7,上述数值表明岩体形成时代应为印支期。根据野外实地勘查以及进一步室内研究工作,可以初步推测出,该地区在中生代时期曾经发生过古陆块内部拉张作用,由此所诱发的大规模构造-岩浆活动及相关流体活动为该区钼(钨)矿床的形成提供了物质、动力和热力来源。区内含矿花岗岩即是此次构造-岩浆作用产物。除此之外,由于宝格达乌拉地区位于早期西伯利亚板块和华北板块相互俯冲和碰撞的交界处,区域内花岗岩体在形成过程中受到了多期次岩浆热液作用的影响,因此在对区域内锆石年龄及相关微量元素进行测定时发现,该区域内含矿岩体岩性复杂,表现出了一定的继承性。这也为研究人员对二连浩特-东乌珠穆沁旗一带矿床成因作用的进一步研究提供了重要参考。 相似文献
2.
Greg M. Baniak Murray K. Gingras Beverly A. Burns S. George Pemberton 《Sedimentology》2014,61(5):1261-1285
Integrated ichnological and sedimentological analyses of core samples from the Upper Jurassic Ula Formation in the Norwegian Central Graben were undertaken to quantify the influence of storm waves on sedimentation. Two main facies associations (offshore and shoreface) that form a progradational coarsening upward succession are recognizable within the cores. The offshore deposits are characterized by massive to finely laminated mudstones and fine‐grained sandstones, within a moderately to highly bioturbated complex. The trace fossil assemblage is dominated by deposit‐feeding structures (for example, Planolites, Phycosiphon and Rosselia) and constitutes an expression of the proximal Zoophycos to distal Cruziana ichnofacies. The absence of grazing behaviours and dominance of deposit‐feeding ichnofossils is a reflection of the increased wave energies present (i.e. storm‐generated currents) within an offshore setting. The shoreface succession is represented by highly bioturbated fine‐grained to medium‐grained sandstones, with intervals of planar and trough cross‐bedding, thin pebble lags and bivalve‐rich shell layers. The ichnofossil assemblage, forming part of the Skolithos ichnofacies, is dominated by higher energy Ophiomorpha nodosa ichnofossils and lower energy Ophiomorpha irregulaire and Siphonichnus ichnofossils. The presence of sporadic wave‐generated sedimentary structures and variability in ichnofossil diversity and abundance attests to the influence of storm‐generated currents during deposition. As a whole, the Ula Formation strongly reflects the influence of storm deposits on sediment deposition; consequently, storm‐influenced shoreface most accurately describes these depositional environments. 相似文献
1