排序方式： 共有7条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Sara Heidarie Golafzani Abolfazl Eslami 《Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards》2020,14(3):216-230
ABSTRACT Since piles are one of the major geotechnical foundation systems, estimation of their axial bearing capacity is of great importance. Employing different design methods, resulting in a wide range of bearing capacity estimations, complicates the selection of an appropriate design scheme and confirms the existence of model error along with the inherent soil variability in bearing capacity prediction. This paper tends to evaluate different predictive methods in Reliability-Based Design (RBD) framework. In this regard, different static analyses, SPT and CPT-based methods are considered to evaluate which approaches collectively and which method individually, have more reliable predictions for compiled data bank. In order to assess reliability indices and resistance factors, two approaches have been considered, i.e. First Order Second Moment method (FOSM) and First Order Reliability Method (FORM). To investigate the reliability indices for different methods in both RBD approaches, various safety factors and loading ratios have been considered. Also, the Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) resistance factors are calibrated for different target reliability indices and loading ratios. Results show that CPT-based methods are more reliable among other methods. Furthermore, the estimated efficiency ratio, i.e. the ratio of resistance factor to resistance bias factor, confirms this agreement. 相似文献
2.
3.
The increase of pile resistance with time is referred to as ‘set-up’. This behaviour of driven piles has been widely discussed in many studies by researchers. Meanwhile, there has been little, if any, information regarding this aspect for drilled shafts. Performing a bearing capacity test for a shaft over time, however, requires higher costs and more complicated rigs compared to a driven pile. A database including results from five Osterberg cell-tested drilled shafts conducted at two different stages is considered, from which the set-up effect is statistically analysed. The reliability-based analysis technique using Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) is used to develop separate resistance factors to account for different degrees of uncertainties associated with the predicted reference resistance and the predicted set-up resistance in the framework of the load and resistance factor design (LRFD) method. By incorporating set-up into design, shaft length or number of shafts can be reduced and economical design of drilled shafts can be achieved. 相似文献
4.
目前的AASHTO LRFD桥梁规范主要考虑重力荷载和卡车等活荷载的组合情况,而没有在概率基础上考虑地震等极端荷载的组合问题.包括LRFD在内的很多桥梁抗震规范都是主要考虑地震的作用,甚至设计时不考虑其他荷载的作用,LRFD设计指导手册中在考虑地震等极端荷载时,也只是提到在特殊情况和桥梁比较长的情况下再考虑卡车的作用,... 相似文献
5.
空间随机场模型的建立与桩基竖向承载力的可靠度分析 总被引：5，自引：4，他引：1
为了研究桩基础的可靠度设计方法,搜集和整理了大量的海洋土钻孔资料,开发了用于地基可靠度分析的数据库系统。利用数据库强大的数理统计功能建立起土性剖面的空间随机场模型,进而将随机场理论与可靠度理论相结合,对渤海海域中海工结构物桩基础的稳定性进行了可靠度分析,详细阐述了各个设计指标的变化对分项系数及可靠度指标的影响规律,并对各指标的灵敏度进行比较分析。结果表明,在各个设计参数中厚土层的强度指标以及设计荷载是2个重要的参数,在渤海海域中应用API标准 (美国桩基规范) 中规定的荷载抗力系数进行设计是安全可靠的。 相似文献
6.
Masahiro Takenobu Masafumi Miyata Yu Otake Takehiko Sato 《Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards》2019,13(3):195-204
ABSTRACTThe Partial Factor Method (PFM) based on the Level 1 reliability design method was introduced in 2007 to the Technical Standards for Port and Harbour Facilities (TSPHF-2007) in Japan. After nearly 10 years of practical use of TSPHF-2007, the design standard has been revised based on requests from the practitioners who recommend the transition from the PFM to the Load Resistance Factor Design (LRFD). In this paper, we discuss the setting method of the target failure probability to determine the partial factors based on code calibration. Furthermore, we examine the impacts of implementing the LRFD concept to the TSPHF by taking the sliding and overturning of a gravity type quay wall as an example to represent port and harbour facilities. We found no practical difference in caisson width derived using the LRFD and the PFM, whereas the degree of matching of the target failure probability was somewhat more precise for the PFM. This finding indicates that the LRFD is a more reasonable design method than the PFM in terms of the simplicity of the performance function itself and the ease of engineering interpretation during the design procedure. 相似文献
7.
1