排序方式： 共有2条查询结果，搜索用时 5 毫秒
1
1.
主量及微量元素系统对比表明,碧口南范坝、庙里湾地区的变质玄武岩具有低S、i低Ti、低P、高Mg#和高A l2O3/TiO2的特点,具有玻安质岩的地球化学特点;在N-MORB标准化元素配分图上,亏损高场强元素(Ti,Zr,Y),富集难熔元素(C r,Co,N i),稀土配分模式呈LREE亏损的左倾形式,表明本区岩石可能是早期经历过较高程度部分熔融后亏损难熔地幔楔橄榄岩,在有少量水参与的情况下发生部分熔融形成的。结合本区岛弧拉斑玄武岩的研究,本区玻安质岩石应来自于一个弧前消减环境,这一认识对于确定碧口火山岩系的构造属性具有重要意义。 相似文献
2.
Geochemical data are presented for a suite of mafic volcanic rocks from the Geita area in the Sukumaland greenstone belt (SGB) of northwestern Tanzania with the aim of constraining their petrogenesis, tectonic setting and to assess a possible genetic link with mafic volcanic rocks from the Rwamagaza area also from the SGB previously reported by [Manya, S., Maboko, M.A.H., 2003. Dating basaltic volcanism in the Neoarchaean Sukumaland greenstone belt of the Tanzania Craton using the Sm–Nd method: implications for the geological evolution of the Tanzania Craton. Precambrian Research 121, 35–45] and [Manya, S., 2004. Geochemistry and petrogenesis of volcanic rocks of the Neoarchaean Sukumaland greenstone belt, northwestern Tanzania. Journal of African Earth Sciences 40, 269–279]. Mafic volcanic rocks from the two locations in the SGB show similar geochemical and Nd-isotopic compositions. Trace element and Nd-isotope compositions are consistent with their generation from a depleted MORB mantle (DMM) source which had been metasomatised by a subduction component in a late Archaean back arc setting at 2823 Ma.These findings are at variance with the previously proposed lithostratigraphical framework in the SGB which postulated an inner arcuate belt dominated by lower Nyanzian mafic volcanic rocks and an outer belt dominated by upper Nyanzian chemical sedimentary rocks, rare felsic flows and shales. The presence of mafic volcanic rocks flanking the outer belt which are of similar composition and age as those of the inner belt suggests that mafic volcanics in the SGB form discontinuous patches of rock distributed throughout the belt and separated by intervening granites. Furthermore, they corroborate previous evidence that both the rocks of the inner and outer belt formed more or less coevally and the subdivision of the volcano-sedimentary package of the SGB (and other greenstone belts of the Tanzania Craton) into a lower mafic volcanic dominated unit and an upper felsic volcanic and BIF dominated unit is not stratigraphically valid. 相似文献
1