| A comparison between different ecological de-farming modes in the loess hilly-gully region in China |
| |
| 作者姓名： | XUYong GUOTengyun YANGGuoan |
| |
| 作者单位： | InstituteofGeographic-SciencesandNaturalResourcesResearch,CAS,Beijing100101,China |
| |
| 摘 要： | The eco-environmental restoration has been a chief task of the western development strategies carried out by the central and local governments of China since the late 1990s, and the ecological de-farming has been regarded as a powerful measure for the ecological restoration in the Loess Plateau and the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. “Relieving and de-farming” (RD) and“rebuilding terrace and de-farming” (RTD) are two more mature ones among various de-farming modes. Taking the loess hilly-gully region as a case, this paper summarized the basic characteristics of RD and RTD modes, calculated the sizes of de-farming slope farmland, rebuilt terraces, enlarged garden plots and restored vegetation, and compared the differences of two modes in terms of de-farming area, ecological reestablishment index, investment demand amount and benefits. The results showed that RTD mode has many advantages, including suitable investment, sufficient grain supply and great benefits, and will be the best ecological reestablishment mode in the loess hilly-gully region, and RD mode which is being carried out in this region should be replaced by RTD mode as soon as possible.
|
| 关 键 词： | 生态农场模式 比较研究 黄土 丘陵地区 生态建设 |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《地理学报(英文版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《地理学报(英文版)》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
