|
|||||
|
|
Storage-yield analysis of surface water reservoirs: the role of reliability constraints and operating policies |
|
| Authors: | S Jamshid Mousavi Hosein Alizadeh Kumaraswamy Ponnambalam |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Polytechnic of Tehran), 424 Hafez Ave., P.O. Box: 15875-4413, Tehran, Iran 2. School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Narmak, P.O. Box: 1684613114, Tehran, Iran 3. Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada |
| Abstract: | Stochastic optimization methods are used for optimal design and operation of surface water reservoir systems under uncertainty. Chance-constrained (CC) optimization with linear decision rules (LDRs) is an old approach for determining the minimum reservoir capacity required to meet a specific yield at a target level of reliability. However, this approach has been found to overestimate the reservoir capacity. In this paper, we propose the reason for this overestimation to be the fact that the reliability constraints considered in standard CC LDR models do not have the same meaning as in other models such as reservoir operation simulation models. The simulation models have fulfilled a target reliability level in an average sense (i.e., annually), whereas the standard CC LDR models have met the target reliability level every season of the year. Mixed integer nonlinear programs are presented to clarify the distinction between the two types of reliability constraints and demonstrate that the use of seasonal reliability constraints, rather than an average reliability constraint, leads to 80–150 % and 0–32 % excess capacity for SQ-type and S-type CC LDR models, respectively. Additionally, a modified CC LDR model with an average reliability constraint is proposed to overcome the reservoir capacity overestimation problem. In the second stage, we evaluate different operating policies and show that for the seasonal (average) reliability constraints, open-loop, S-type, standard operating policy, SQ-type, and general SQ-type policies compared to a model not using any operation rule lead to 190–460 % (200–550 %), 100–200 % (80–300 %), 0–90 % (0–60 %), 30–90 % (0–20 %), and 10–90 % (0–10 %) excess capacity, respectively. |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ | |