| 泥石流易发区灾害可接受程度对比研究 ——以云南东川和甘肃舟曲为例 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘希林,郭梨花.泥石流易发区灾害可接受程度对比研究 ——以云南东川和甘肃舟曲为例[J].地理科学,2019,39(1):164-172. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘希林 郭梨花 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中山大学地理科学与规划学院,广东广州510275;广东省城市化与地理环境空间模拟重点实验室,广东广州510275;中山大学地理科学与规划学院,广东广州,510275 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金项目资助(41171407) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 以云南东川和甘肃舟曲两个泥石流易发区为例,通过问卷调查和统计分析,对比两地区公众对泥石流灾害后果关注程度和对泥石流灾害可接受程度及其影响因素的异同。研究结果表明：① 东川公众最关注财产损失,舟曲公众最关注疾病发生,两地区公众对环境破坏和房屋损失的关注程度都较高。② 东川公众对泥石流灾害发生次数（简称次数）和每年愿意支付的防灾保险费用（简称保险费用）可接受程度高的人数百分比高于舟曲公众;舟曲公众对泥石流灾害提前预告时间（简称预告时间）、居住地到泥石流灾害点距离（简称距离）可接受程度高的人数百分比高于东川公众。③ 两地区公众对 “次数”的可接受程度最低,对“保险费用”的可接受程度最高,对“预告时间”和“距离”的可接受程度中等。④ 两地区公众对泥石流灾害可接受程度有共同影响的因素包括：年龄对“距离”的影响,性别对“次数”和“距离”的影响,文化程度对“预告时间”和“保险费用”的影响,收入对“次数”“距离”和“保险费用”的影响。其它影响泥石流可接受程度的因素,两地区公众各有差异。
|
| 关 键 词： | 泥石流灾害 灾害可接受程度 云南东川 甘肃舟曲 防灾减灾 |
| 收稿时间： | 2018-01-12 |
| 修稿时间： | 2018-04-20 |
Comparisons of the Acceptability of Debris Flow Disasters in the Hazard-prone Areas: Case Studies in Dongchuan and Zhouqu |
| |
| Xilin Liu,Lihua Guo.Comparisons of the Acceptability of Debris Flow Disasters in the Hazard-prone Areas: Case Studies in Dongchuan and Zhouqu[J].Scientia Geographica Sinica,2019,39(1):164-172. |
| |
| Authors: | Xilin Liu Lihua Guo |
| |
| Institution: | School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, China
Guangdong Key Laboratory for Urbanization and Geo-simulation, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, China |
| |
| Abstract: | People are the direct recipients of disaster risk and the executors of risk management. To understand the acceptability of disaster for people is a necessary part of risk management. Taking Dongchuan of Yunnan and Zhouqu of Gansu where debris flows are prone to occur as case studies, through questionnaire investigation and statistical analysis, the similarities and differences of the consequence and acceptability of debris flow disaster and their influencing factors were approached. The conclusions are as follows: 1) The people in Dongchuan were most concerned about property loss, while the disease occurrence received the most attention of the people in Zhouqu, and the people’s concerns to environment destructions and house loss were high in both areas. 2) For the population percentages of the numbers of debris flow occurrence (Frequency) and the willingness to pay for annual disaster insurance (Insurance premium), the acceptability with very high grade in Dongchuan was more than that in Zhouqu; for the population percentages of the warning time for debris flow disaster (Warning time) and the distance from residence to debris flow hazard location (Distance), the acceptability with very high grade in Zhouqu was more than that in Dongchuan. 3) In both areas, the acceptability of Frequency was the lowest, while the acceptability of Insurance premium was the highest, and the acceptabilities of Warning time and Distance were moderate. 4) There were common influential factors on debris flow acceptability in both areas, including the factors of age on Distance, sex on Frequency, Distance, educational level on Warning time and Insurance premium, and income on Frequency, Distance and Insurance premium. The other influencing factors are different in the two areas. This study may provide references for risk management in debris flow prone areas. |
| |
| Keywords: | debris-flow disaster disaster acceptability Dongchuan in Yunnan Zhouqu in Gansu disaster prevention and mitigation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《地理科学》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《地理科学》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
