首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Calcium–phosphate treatment of contaminated soil for arsenic immobilization
Institution:1. Department of Geological Sciences, University of Alabama, Box 870338, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, United States;2. University of Idaho-Idaho Falls, 1776 Science Center Drive, Suite 306, Idaho Falls, ID 83402, United States;1. Qingdao Solid Waste Pollution Control and Resource Engineering Research Center, Qingdao University of Technology, School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Qingdao 266033, China;2. Department of Science and Environmental Studies, The Education University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong, China;3. Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Bioremediation, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China;1. Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Tianjin 300191, China;2. College of Natural Resources & Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China;3. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;4. Department of Soil Quality, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Abstract:The application of As-based herbicides at several industrial sites has resulted in numerous localized areas of As-contaminated soil. In this study, an As-contaminated soil (As = 278 mg/kg) collected from an industrial site located in the southeastern USA was subjected to inorganic phosphate (Pi) treatments. Although Pi treatments have been previously used for flushing As from contaminated soils, in this study, contaminated soil was amended with Pi to study the possible immobilization of As through a co-precipitation mechanism. Specifically, the Pi amendment was aimed at simultaneous flushing of As from the soil with orthophosphoric acid and co-precipitating it as Ca–phosphate–arsenate phases. Bench-scale Pi treatment experiments were performed at different pH conditions, with and without the addition of Ca. Sorption of Pi on BH soil in the presence or absence of additional Ca was determined, along with the associated mobilization of As from the soil. A significant amount of the HNO3-digestible As (up to 55% at pH 4, 10–15% at pH 8, and ∼30% at pH 11) was released from the contaminated soil during the Pi sorption experiments. This increased mobility of As after the addition of Pi resulted from the competitive desorption of As from the soil. Although Pi sorption at high pH (>8) was largely controlled by precipitation, As did not co-precipitate with Pi. Aqueous geochemical modeling indicated that the lack of As co-precipitation during Pi-only treatment primarily resulted from the deficiency of Ca in the system. When additional Ca (16.9 mmol) was supplied along with Pi (3.38 mmol), the mobility of As decreased significantly at circum-neutral to high solution pH. Geochemical modeling suggested that the leachable As in the soil was potentially precipitated as As-bearing Ca–Pi phases. X-ray diffraction analysis of precipitates separated from the treated soil and from the synthetic leachate confirmed that the formation of a poorly crystalline carbonate apatite phase occurred as a consequence of the treatment. The results of this study support the potential application of Ca–Pi treatment for remediation of As-contaminated soil at environmentally relevant pH conditions.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号