Assessing the dye‐tracer correction factor for documenting the mean velocity of sheet flow over smooth and grassed surfaces |
| |
| Authors: | Chengzhong Pan Zhouping Shangguan Lan Ma |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Key Laboratory of Water Sediment Sciences, College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China;2. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yangling, Shaanxi, China;3. Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Combating, College of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China |
| |
| Abstract: | In the investigation of overland flow hydraulics, mean flow velocity (V) is frequently estimated using the measured surface flow velocity (Vs) multiplied by a correction factor, α. In total, 291 tests were performed in a flume with three beds smooth glass (GL), sandpaper (SD), and plastic grass (GR)] to investigate α under submerged and non‐submerged flows, and Vs was observed using dye‐tracer method whilst V was calculated by the measured water depth and flow rate. For GL with 5.2% slope and 100 < Re < 5000 Reynolds number (Re)], α ranged from 0.35 to 0.79, with an average of 0.54. For SD with slopes ranging from 2.6% to 25.9% and 300 < Re < 1200, α varied from 0.18 to 0.48 with an average of 0.32. Raindrop impacts decreased α for GL at 5.2% slope, but the effect diminished for SD as the slope increased. The α‐values less than the theoretical value of 0.67 in laminar flows may be attributed to the greater spatial variability in overland flow compared with channel flow. For GR with non‐submerged flows and Re < 4200, α varied inversely with sediment concentration (SC) at 5.2% slope but was only slightly related to SC at steep slopes of 15.6% and 25.9%. The α‐values were approximately 0.8 for turbulent flows and even greater than 1.0 under high flow discharges. This finding may relate to sheet flow disturbance and retarded surface velocity due to the protruding scattered grass stems. For each surface, α varied positively with Re; α was inversely related to slope for SD but positively related to slope for GR. There was a positive relation between h and α for GL and SD but a negative relation for GR, which highlights the importance of flow inundation status to α. The inundation ratio (h/Δ) is a promising indicator for predicting α; thus, further investigations using different submerged and non‐submerged surfaces are required to predict α effectively based on (h/Δ). Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| |
| Keywords: | overland flow flow velocity correction factor slope steepness rainfall |
|
|
