Strengthening bottom-up and top-down climate governance |
| |
| Authors: | Jo Dirix Wouter Peeters Johan Eyckmans Peter Tom Jones Sigrid Sterckx |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences , Vrije Universiteit Brussel , 2 Pleinlaan, Brussels , 1050 , Belgium jo.dirix@vub.ac.be;3. Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences , Vrije Universiteit Brussel , 2 Pleinlaan, Brussels , 1050 , Belgium;4. Centre for Economics and Management , Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel , Brussels , Belgium;5. Metallurgy and Materials Engineering , Katholieke Universiteit Leuven , Leuven , Belgium;6. Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences , Vrije Universiteit Brussel , 2 Pleinlaan, Brussels , 1050 , Belgium;7. Philosophy and Moral Sciences , Universiteit Gent , Ghent , Belgium |
| |
| Abstract: | Although the UN and EU focus their climate policies on the prevention of a 2 °C global mean temperature rise, it has been estimated that a rise of at least 4?°C is more likely. Given the political climate of inaction, there is a need to instigate a bottom-up approach so as to build domestic support for future climate treaties, empower citizens, and motivate leaders to take action. A review is provided of the predominant top-down cap-and-trade policies in place – the Kyoto Protocol and EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) – with a focus on the grandfathering of emissions entitlements and the possibility of offsetting emissions. These policies are evaluated according to two criteria of justice and it is concluded that they fail to satisfy them. Some suggestions as to how the EU ETS can be improved so as to enable robust climate action are also offered. Policy relevance The current supranational climate policy has not been successful and global leaders have postponed the adoption of a meaningful successor to the Kyoto Protocol. In view of this inaction, bottom-up approaches with regard to climate policy should be further developed. It is argued that two of the main top-down policies, grandfathering and offsetting, impede the avowed goals of EU climate policy and pose significant ethical dilemmas with regard to participatory and intergenerational justice. In order to provide a more robust EU climate policy, the EU should inter alia provide a long-term perspective for investors, reduce the volatility of the carbon price, and prepare for the possibility of carbon leakage. |
| |
| Keywords: | bottom-up initiatives climate policy ethics EU ETS grandfathering offsetting top-down approaches |
|
|
