Fisheries property rights and recreational/commercial conflict: implications of policy developments in Australia and New Zealand |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre (NAFC), Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), St. John''s, NL, Canada;2. Northeast Fisheries Science Center (NEFSC), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Woods Hole, MA, USA;3. Lowestoft Laboratory, Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS), Lowestoft, UK;4. Bedford Institute of Oceanography (BIO), Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), Dartmouth, NS, Canada;1. Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Department of Fish Biology, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587 Berlin, Germany;2. Hochschule für Wirtschaft und Recht Berlin (HWR), Badensche Straße 52, 10825 Berlin, Germany;3. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Crop and Animal Sciences, Divison of Integrative Fisheries Management, Philippstraße 13 (Haus 7), 10115 Berlin, Germany;1. Department of Management and International Business, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand;2. LawAid International, 36 Cameron Road, Tauranga, New Zealand;1. Deakin University, Australia;2. University of Tasmania, Australia;3. Australian Catholic University, Australia;1. School of Applied Science, Republic Polytechnic, Singapore;2. Tropical Marine Science Institute, National University of Singapore;3. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore;1. Department of Biology and Ecology of Fishes, Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587, Berlin, Germany;2. Division of Integrative Fisheries Management, Faculty of Life Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 42, 10115, Berlin, Germany;3. Thünen Institute of Baltic Sea Fisheries, Alter Hafen Süd 2, 18069, Rostock, Germany;4. General and Specific Zoology, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany;5. Mecklenburg‐Vorpommern Research Centre for Agriculture and Fisheries, Institute of Fisheries, Fischerweg 408, 18069, Rostock, Germany |
| |
| Abstract: | Commercial fisheries management in Australia and New Zealand is increasingly based on better definition of the rights and responsibilities of resource users. At the same time recreational fishers are claiming a greater share of resources largely based on perceptions of superior economic returns to the community from their activities. The basis of the conflict between traditional, recreational and commercial resource users is moving from physical competition for fish to economic and legal arguments over social priorities. Advantages and disadvantages of increased use of property rights in resource allocation are investigated. It is argued that the recreational sector needs better definition of its claim for priority access to resources. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
