Distribution and cycling of dimethylsulfide in surface microlayer and subsurface seawater |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Environmental Science, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS, Canada;2. Environmental Science Programme, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John''s, NL, Canada;3. Environment and Climate Change Canada, Science and Technology Branch, Air Quality Research Division, Toronto, ON, Canada;1. The University Centre in Svalbard, Longyearbyen, Norway;2. Sustainable Arctic Marine and Coastal Technology (SAMCoT), Centre for Research-based Innovations (CRI), Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway;1. The University Centre in Svalbard, Pb. 156, 9171 Longyearbyen, Norway;2. Sustainable Arctic Marine and Coastal Technology (SAMCoT), Centre for Research-based Innovations (CRI), Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Høyskoleringen 7a, 7491 Trondheim, Norway;3. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Høyskoleringen 7a, 7491 Trondheim, Norway |
| |
| Abstract: | Laboratory experiments, along with in situ investigation in Funka Bay, Japan, were conducted to determine the enrichment factor (EF) of dimethylsulfide (DMS) in the sea surface microlayer, as well as its the production and consumption rates. The EF of DMS in the microlayer was largely affected by various factors including sampling methods, sampling thickness, temperature, salinity, and DMS concentration in bulk water. In all cases but the sealed system, a part of DMS in the microlayer was always unavoidably lost during sampling. High temperature, great wind speed, and slow sampling would increase the extent of loss of DMS due to volatilization. In the field, the screen-collected samples usually exhibited greater microlayer enrichment for DMS than the plate-collected samples, showing that the screen sampler might be more effective for collecting the in situ microlayer DMS. The production and consumption rates of DMS in the surface microlayer were higher than those in the bulk water and these two rates were significantly correlated with the microlayer DMS concentrations. Moreover, the EF of DMS appeared to be related to the microlayer production rate of DMS, providing evidence supporting the observed DMS enrichment in the microlayer. The DMS production and consumption rates were not directly related to its concentrations in the bulk water, suggesting that the processes of production and consumption of DMS were very complex. In the surface microlayer, the biological turnover time of DMS varied from 0.4 to 1.9 days, with an average of 0.9 days, which was about 540-fold greater than the mean DMS sea–air turnover time (2.4 min). Thus, the biological process occurring within the microlayer can be neglected when we consider the sea–air exchange of DMS. Considering the microlayer production rate of DMS (an average of 9.7 nM day?1) to be too small to counteract the sea-to-air removal of DMS, the main source of DMS in the microlayer appears to be through vertical transport by turbulent diffusion from the underlying water. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
