|
|||||
|
|
Numerical studies of methane production from Class 1 gas hydrate accumulations enhanced with carbon dioxide injection |
|
| Authors: | MD White SK WurstnerBP McGrail |
| Institution: | a Hydrology Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P. O. Box 999, MSIN K9-33, Richland, WA 99352, USA b Environmental Characterization and Risk Assessment Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, USA c Applied Geology and Geochemistry Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, USA |
| Abstract: | Class 1 gas hydrate accumulations are characterized by a permeable hydrate-bearing interval overlying a permeable interval with mobile gas, sandwiched between two impermeable intervals. Depressurization-induced dissociation is currently the favored technology for producing gas from Class 1 gas hydrate accumulations. The depressurization production technology requires heat transfer from the surrounding environment to sustain dissociation as the temperature drops toward the hydrate equilibrium point and leaves the reservoir void of gas hydrate. Production of gas hydrate accumulations by exchanging carbon dioxide with methane in the clathrate structure has been demonstrated in laboratory experiments and proposed as a field-scale technology. The carbon dioxide exchange technology has the potential for yielding higher production rates and mechanically stabilizing the reservoir by maintaining hydrate saturations. We used numerical simulation to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of using carbon dioxide injection to enhance the production of methane from Class 1 gas hydrate accumulations. Numerical simulations in this study were primarily concerned with the mechanisms and approaches of carbon dioxide injection to investigate whether methane production could be enhanced through this approach. To avoid excessive simulation execution times, a five-spot well pattern with a 500-m well spacing was approximated using a two-dimensional domain having well boundaries on the vertical sides and impermeable boundaries on the horizontal sides. Impermeable over- and under burden were included to account for heat transfer into the production interval. Simulation results indicate that low injection pressures can be used to reduce secondary hydrate formation and that direct contact of injected carbon dioxide with the methane hydrate present in the formation is limited due to bypass through the higher permeability gas zone. |
| Keywords: | Gas hydrate Mixed gas hydrate Natural gas hydrate Numerical simulation Depressurization CO2 exchange Class 1 hydrate deposit Class 1 hydrate accumulation Permafrost |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ | |