Length Scales of Scalar Diffusion in the Convective Boundary Layer: Laboratory Observations |
| |
| Authors: | Email author" target="_blank">Han?van?DopEmail author Dirk?van?As Alec?van?Herwijnen Mark?F?Hibberd Harm?Jonker |
| |
| Institution: | (1) IMAU, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80.005, 3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands;(2) Civil Engineering Department, University of Calgary, Canada;;(3) CSIRO Atmospheric Research, Aspendale, Australia;(4) Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands |
| |
| Abstract: | A laboratory study of scalar diffusion in the convective boundary layer has found results that are consistent with a 1999 large-eddy simulation (LES) study by Jonker, Duynkerke and Cuijpers. For bottom-up and top-down scalars (introduced as ‘infinite’ area sources of passive tracer at the surface and inversion, respectively) the dominant length scale was found to be much larger than the length scale for density fluctuations, the latter being equal to the boundary-layer depth h. The variance of the normalized passive scalar grew continuously with time and its magnitude was about 3–5 times larger for the top-down case than for the bottom-up case. The vertical profiles of the normalized passive scalar variance were found to be approximately constant through the convective boundary layer (CBL) with a value of about 3–8c*2 for bottom-up and 10–50c*2 for top-down diffusion. Finally, there was some evidence of a minimum in the variance and dominant length scale for scalar flux ratios (top-down to bottom-up flux) close to −0.5. All these convection tank results confirm the LES results and support the hypothesis that there is a distinct difference in behaviour between the dynamic and passive variables in the CBL. |
| |
| Keywords: | Convective boundary layer Entrainment flux ratio Length scales Large-eddy simulation Turbulents diffusion |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
