| Abstract: | There are two main sources of non-orthogonality in multicomponent shear-wave seismics: inherent non-orthogonal split shear waves arising from substantial ray deviation in off-symmetry planes due to strong anisotropy or complex overburden, and apparent non-orthogonal split shear waves in the horizontal plane due to variation of the angle of incidence even if the two shear waves along the raypath are orthogonal. Many techniques for processing shear-wave splitting in VSP data ignore these kinds of non-orthogonality of the split shear waves. Assuming inherent non-orthogonality in zero-offset VSPs, and apparent non-orthogonality in offset VSPs, we derive equations for the four-component data matrix. These can be solved by extending the linear-transform technique (LTT) to determine the shear-wave polarizations in zero-offset and offset VSPs. Both full-wave synthetic and field data are used to evaluate the technique and to examine the effects of non-orthogonal polarized split shear waves. If orthogonality is incorrectly assumed, errors in polarization measurements increase with the degree of non-orthogonality, which introduces a consistent decreasing trend in the polarization measurements. However, the effect of non-orthogonality on the estimation of geophone orientation and time delays of the two split shear waves is small and negligible in most realistic cases. Furthermore, for most cases of weak anisotropy (less than 5% shear-wave anisotropy) apparent non-orthogonality is more significant than inherent non-orthogonality. Nevertheless, for strong anisotropy (more than 10% shear-wave anisotropy) with complicated structure (tilted or inclined symmetry axis), inherent non-orthogonality may no longer be negligible. Applications to both synthetic and real data show that the extended linear-transform techniques permit accurate recovery of polarization measurements in the presence of both significant inherent and apparent non-orthogonality where orthogonal techniques often fail. |
