首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

泥沙输移方程在地貌预测模型研究应用中的局限性
引用本文:魏翔,李占斌.泥沙输移方程在地貌预测模型研究应用中的局限性[J].地理学报(英文版),2004,14(1):94-104.
作者姓名:魏翔  李占斌
作者单位:[1]StateKeyLabofSoilErosionandDrylandFarmingontheLoessPlateau,InstituteofSoilandWaterConservation,CAS,Yangling712100,China [2]Xi'anUniversityofTechnology,Xi'an710000,China
基金项目:Knowledge Innovation Project of CAS,No.KZCX1-10-04
摘    要:Sources of uncertainty or error that arise in attempting to scale up the results of laboratory-scale sediment transport studies for predictive modeling of geomorphic systems include: (i) model imperfection, (ii) omission of important processes, (iii) lack of knowledge of initial conditions, (iv) sensitivity to initial conditions, (v) unresolved heterogeneity, (vi) occurrence of external forcing, and (vii) inapplicability of the factor of safety concept. Sources of uncertainty that are unimportant or that can be controlled at small scales and over short time scales become important in large-scale applications and over long time scales. Control and repeatability, hallmarks of laboratory-scale experiments, are usually lacking at the large scales characteristic of geomorphology. Heterogeneity is an important concomitant of size, and tends to make large systems unique. Uniqueness implies that prediction cannot be based upon first-principles quantitative modeling alone, but must be a function of system history as well. Periodic data collection, feedback, and model updating are essential where site-specific prediction is required.

关 键 词:泥沙运移方程  地貌  预测模型  局限性  冗长
收稿时间:2003-09-12

Applicative limitations of sediment transport on predictive modeling in geomorphology
Wei,Xiang,Li,Zhanbin.Applicative limitations of sediment transport on predictive modeling in geomorphology[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2004,14(1):94-104.
Authors:Wei  Xiang  Li  Zhanbin
Institution:1. State Key Lab of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, CAS, Yangling 712100, China|; 2. Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710000, China
Abstract:Sources of uncertainty or error that arise in attempting to scale up the results of laboratory-scale sediment transport studies for predictive modeling of geomorphic systems include: (i) model imperfection, (ii) omission of important processes, (iii) lack of knowledge of initial conditions, (iv) sensitivity to initial conditions, (v) unresolved heterogeneity, (vi) occurrence of external forcing, and (vii) inapplicability of the factor of safety concept. Sources of uncertainty that are unimportant or that can be controlled at small scales and over short time scales become important in large-scale applications and over long time scales. Control and repeatability, hallmarks of laboratory-scale experiments, are usually lacking at the large scales characteristic of geomorphology. Heterogeneity is an important concomitant of size, and tends to make large systems unique. Uniqueness implies that prediction cannot be based upon first-principles quantitative modeling alone, but must be a function of system history as well. Periodic data collection, feedback, and model updating are essential where site-specific prediction is required.
Keywords:sediment transport  geomorphic systems  predictive models
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地理学报(英文版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地理学报(英文版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号