|
|||||
|
|
| 基于活力特征分析的城市安置社区公共空间研究——以苏州城区6个安置社区为例 | |
| 引用本文： | 王勇,邹晴晴,李广斌.基于活力特征分析的城市安置社区公共空间研究——以苏州城区6个安置社区为例[J].地理科学,2018,38(5):747-754. |
| 作者姓名： | 王勇 邹晴晴 李广斌 |
| 作者单位： | 1.苏州科技大学建筑与城市规划学院, 江苏 苏州215011 2.苏州科技大学地理与资源学系, 江苏 苏州 215009 |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金面上项目（51578352,51778387）、江苏省高校自然科学研究项目（15KJB560010）资助 |
| 摘 要： | 由“散居”到“集居”,安置社区面临社会关系重建的巨大压力。基于公共空间活力内涵,采用AHP-模糊综合评价法,构建了城市安置社区公共空间活力评价模型,以苏州市6个安置社区为例,对3种安置模式的社区公共空间活力特征进行定量评价和比较。发现：① 不同安置模式的社区公共空间活力存在明显差异。尽管异地安置社区的公共空间的设施完备、类型多样,但是其公共空间的社会活力度最低。对于公共空间活力提升,社区公共空间背后的社会属性比其物质属性更为重要。②公共空间因子活力度与关注度存在不匹配现象。基于“社会-空间”辩证互动逻辑,提出安置社区公共空间活力营造策略： 对于今后安置社区,适宜“村内小集居+跨村大聚居”的安置模式,通过最大程度维系原有“熟人社区”群体的社会边界,提升公共空间活力,减轻社区社会关系重建的压力;对于现有安置社区,可根据公共空间因子活力度和关注度的匹配关系,划分公共空间改造的优先级,采用差别化的改造策略,提升公共空间活力及其改造资金的使用效率。 |
| 关 键 词： | 公共空间 活力评价 城市安置社区 AHP-模糊综合评价法 苏州 |
| 收稿时间： | 2017-06-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2017-09-02 |
Public Space Construction of Urban Resettlement Community Based on Analysis of Vitality Characteristics: Taking the 6 Resettlement Communities of Suzhou as Examples |
|
| Yong Wang,Qingqing Zou,Guangbin Li.Public Space Construction of Urban Resettlement Community Based on Analysis of Vitality Characteristics: Taking the 6 Resettlement Communities of Suzhou as Examples[J].Scientia Geographica Sinica,2018,38(5):747-754. | |
| Authors: | Yong Wang Qingqing Zou Guangbin Li |
| Institution: | 1.Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215011, Jiangsu,China 2. Department of Geography and Resources Sciences, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, Jiangsu, China |
| Abstract: | The previous rural neighborhood is disintegrated from “diaspora” to “assembly”, making the resettlement community facing to enormous reconstruction pressure in social relation. Based on the connotation of public space vitality and by the AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, the author constructed the model evaluating the community public space vitality of urban resettlement communities, conducted quantitative evaluation and comparison for the features of community public space vitality of the three resettlement modes by taking the 6 resettlement communities of Suzhou as examples and found: 1) There were obvious difference in the public space vitality of communities in different resettlement modes. Though the public space of nonlocal resettlement communities was consummated in facilities anddiversiform in types, the social vitality of the public space was the lowest of which the fundamental cause was that: most of the nonlocal resettlement communities were the assembled residential communities crossing villages and houses were distributed in lottery random mode, thus making the fragmentation degree of the social relation of nonlocal resettlement communities the highest. Such phenomenon meant that the social attribute behind the community public space was more important that its physical attribute for the improvement of public space vitality. 2) There was mismatch between the public space factors’ vitality degree and attention degree. Based on the match status between the public space factors’ vitality degree and attention degree, the author divided that public space to four categories—“high attention-low vitality”, “high attention-high vitality”, “low attention-high vitality” and “low attention-low vitality”. Based on the dialectical interactive logic of “the society-the space”, the author proposed the strategies creating the public space vitality of resettlement communities: 1) As for the future resettlement communities suiting the resettlement mode-“small assemblies inside villages plus large assemblies crossing villages”, we may minimize the fragmentation degree of community social relation in the process from “diaspora” to “assembly” by maintaining the population boundary of the previous “villages community” acquaintance society to the maximum extent in order to improve the public space vitality and abate the reconstruction pressure of community social relation. 2) As for the existing resettlement communities, we may divide the priority level of public space transformation based on the matching relation of public space factors’ vitality degree and attention degree, adopt differentiated transformation strategies to improve the public space vitality and the utilization efficiency of the transformation funds. |
| Keywords: | public space vitality evaluation urban resettlement community AHP-Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method Suzhou |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ | |
| 点击此处可从《地理科学》浏览原始摘要信息 | |
| 点击此处可从《地理科学》下载免费的PDF全文 | |