Latitudinal patterns in seagrass epifauna: Do patterns exist,and can they be explained? |
| |
| Authors: | Robert W Virnstein Walter G Nelson F Graham Lewis Robert K Howard |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Harbor Branch Foundation, Inc., RR 1, Box 196, 33450, Fort Pierce, Florida
2. Department of Oceanography and Ocean Engineering, Florida Institute of Technology, 32901, Melbourne, Florida
|
| |
| Abstract: | Seagrass-associated epifauna of several taxa constitute a major parallel element of seagrass communities over a range of latitudes. Hypotheses relating to latitudinal variation of several factors (e.g., predation, competition, primary production, habitat structure, stability and time) have been proposed to explain geographic variation in the structure of biological systems. We have summarized available information to firstly determine whether any latitudinal patterns exist for the seagrass-associated epifauna, and secondly to examine hypotheses which might explain observed patterns. Diversity and density of various seagrass epifaunal groups showed inconsistent latitudinal patterns. Diversity of decapod and amphipod crustaceans increased significantly with decreasing latitude, while diversity of isopods and fishes showed nonsignificant trends with latitude. Amphipod diversity was highly correlated with seagrass biomass over the range of latitudes. However, density of amphipods showed no pattern with either latitude or seagrass biomass; large within-site differences may have overwhelmed latitudinal patterns. For seagrass-associated amphipods, two parameters presumably related to predation intensity showed contradictory patterns. Size of individuals generally decreased toward the tropics, yet susceptibility to predators showed weak trends of increasing in the tropics. We found little support for the assumed gradients of those hypotheses proposed to explain latitudinal patterns in biota. Only a weak trend of increasing seagrass production toward the tropics was found; there was no relationship between latitude and seagrass biomass (=habitat complexity in part), epiphyte species richness (=habitat heterogeneity in part), or predator abundance. No data were available comparing actual intensity of predation on seagrass fauna or on proposed gradients of stability and competition. The patterns found were not consistent with the predictions of any single hypothesis. Contrary to evidence from other biological systems, it appears that latitude is, in general, an inconsistent predictor of differences in structure of the epifaunal component of seagrass communities. Although we did find some latitudinal patterns of increasing diversity and susceptibility to predators and decreasing size of individual amphipods toward the tropics, we were astonished by the lack of data supporting the assumptions of hypotheses concerning primary productivity, stability, time, competition, predation and habitat heterogeneity and complexity. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
