|
|||||
|
|
| 民族地区文旅产业融合的时空演变及影响 因素分析 | |
| 引用本文： | 郑陈柔雨,杨存栋,任雯星.民族地区文旅产业融合的时空演变及影响 因素分析[J].世界地理研究,2022,31(3):613-623. |
| 作者姓名： | 郑陈柔雨 杨存栋 任雯星 |
| 作者单位： | 中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所，长春 130102 中国科学院大学资源与环境学院，北京 100049 内蒙古大学历史与旅游文化学院，呼和浩特 010021 |
| 基金项目： | 内蒙古社科规划项目(2018NDB063) |
| 摘 要： | 文旅融合是中国旅游发展的大趋势，也是民族地区社会经济发展的重要方向。以内蒙古自治区为例，基于内蒙古12个盟市2009—2018年的多指标面板数据，运用熵权TopSIS、改进的容量耦合模型、标准差椭圆、重心模型和面板数据分位数回归模型分析民族地区文化产业和旅游产业融合的时空演变特征及影响因素。研究发现：①内蒙古各盟市文化产业发展态势向好，旅游产业区域差异明显；②各盟市处于中度失调向失调-协调过渡的优化发展阶段，融合协调度等级不高，大多数盟市一直处于旅游产业发展滞后的局面；③各盟市空间分异显著，协调度水平呈“蒙中>蒙东>蒙西”的局面，协调度水平相对较好的盟市呈分散分布，盟市间的文旅发展尚未形成合力；④政府支持是内蒙古文旅产业融合低值区的主导影响变量，消费水平是中值区的主导变量，基础设施是高值区的主导变量。 |
| 关 键 词： | 文化产业 旅游产业 融合发展 民族地区 内蒙古 |
| 收稿时间： | 2020-08-12 |
| 修稿时间： | 2021-01-15 |
Spatial-temporal evolution characteristics and influencing factors on integration of cultural industry and tourism industry in ethnic regions |
|
| Chenrouyu ZHENG,Cundong YANG,Wenxing REN.Spatial-temporal evolution characteristics and influencing factors on integration of cultural industry and tourism industry in ethnic regions[J].World Regional Studies,2022,31(3):613-623. | |
| Authors: | Chenrouyu ZHENG Cundong YANG Wenxing REN |
| Institution: | Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China College of History and Tourism, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China |
| Abstract: | The integration of culture and tourism is the general trend for tourism development and an important direction in ethnic regions.Taking Inner Mongolia as an example, basing on multi-indicator panel data of 12 cities from 2009 to 2018, this paper used related methods to analyze the integration of cultural industry and tourism industry and influencing factors in ethnic regions.Results showed that:①The development trend of cultural industry was better, and regional differences in tourism industry were significant.②Cities were in the optimized development stage of transition from imbalance to imbalance-coordination. The integration degree was not high, and most cities were in the lagging situation of tourism industry. ③Spatial differentiation of cities was significant, integration level was in the spatial pattern of "Central> East> West ", Cities with relatively good coordination levels were scattered.④Government support was leading variable in low-value areas, consumption level was the leading variable in medium-value areas, and infrastructure service level was the leading variable in high-value areas. |
| Keywords: | cultural industry tourism industry integrated development ethnic regions Inner Mongolia |
| 点击此处可从《世界地理研究》浏览原始摘要信息 | |
| 点击此处可从《世界地理研究》下载免费的PDF全文 | |