|
|||||
|
|
Extreme oxygen isotope signature of meteoric water in magmatic zircon from metagranite in the Sulu orogen, China: Implications for Neoproterozoic rift magmatism |
|
| Authors: | Jun Tang Yong-Fei Zheng Bing Gong Tian-Shan Gao Fu-Yuan Wu |
| Institution: | a CAS Key Laboratory of Crust-Mantle Materials and Environments, School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China b State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi’an 710069, China c State Key Laboratory of Lithosphere Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China d Beijing SHRIMP Center, Chinese Academy of Geological Science, Beijing 100037, China e State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, Faculty of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China |
| Abstract: | Unusual 18O depletion, with δ18O values as negative as −10‰ to −4‰ relative to VSMOW, was reported in zircons from ultrahigh-pressure eclogite-facies metamorphic rocks in the Dabie-Sulu orogenic belt, China. But it is critical for the negative δ18O zircons to be distinguished between magmatic and metamorphic origins, because the 18O depletion can be acquired by high-T eclogite-facies metamorphism of meteoric-hydrothermally altered low δ18O rocks. While zircon O diffusion kinetics has placed a reasonable constraint on this, zircon trace element compositions can provide a straightforward distinction between the magmatic and metamorphic origins. This paper reports our finding of unusual 18O depletion in zircon from granitic gneiss in the northeastern end of the Sulu orogen. Zircon δ18O values vary from −7.8‰ to −3.1‰ along a profile of 50 m length at Zaobuzhen. They are close to extremely low δ18O values of −9.0‰ to −5.9‰ for metagranite at Qinglongshan and adjacent areas in the southwestern end of the Sulu orogen. CL imaging suggests that the low δ18O zircons at Zaobuzhen are primarily of magmatic origin, but underwent different degrees of metamorphic modification. Zircon U-Pb dating yields middle Neoproterozoic ages of 751 ± 27 to 779 ± 25 Ma for protolith crystallization and Triassic ages of 214 ± 10 to 241 ± 33 Ma for metamorphic resetting. However, no metamorphic modification occurs in zircon REE patterns that only indicate magmatic recrystallization and hydrothermal alteration, respectively. Thus, the negative δ18O zircons are interpreted as crystallizing from negative δ18O magmas due to melting of meteoric-hydrothermally altered negative δ18O rocks in an active rift setting at about 780 Ma. The variation in zircon δ18O values indicates considerable O isotope heterogeneity in its granitic protolith. Zircon Lu-Hf isotope analyses give positive εHf(t) values of 1.6-4.1 and Hf model ages of 1.18-1.30 Ga. This suggests that the granitic protolith was derived from the mid-Neoproterozoic reworking of late Mesoproterozoic juvenile crust. The metagranites at Zaobuzhen and Qinglongshan, about 450 km apart, are two known occurrences of the unusually low δ18O zircons below −6‰ so far reported in the Sulu orogen. They are similar to each other in both protolith and metamorphic ages, so that they share the same nature of both Neoproterozoic protolith and Triassic metamorphism. Therefore, the locally negative δ18O zircons may register centers of low δ18O magmatism during the supercontinental rifting. |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ | |