| 中尺度风场客观分析方法的比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 付秀华,李兴生,吕乃平,施鲁怀.中尺度风场客观分析方法的比较研究[J].应用气象学报,1990,1(3):279-288. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 付秀华 李兴生 吕乃平 施鲁怀 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1.中国科学院大气物理研究所，国家气象局气象科学研究院，国家海洋局海洋环境预报中心，能源部南京电力环保研究所 南京电力环保研究所 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文采用数值试验研究了直接差分法，变分法以及辐散直接调整法在中尺度风场客观分析方法应用中的优缺点。直接差分法得到的整层辐散值最小，所用机时最短，但计算区域上部的垂直速度值偏大。变分法可以克服直接差分法垂直速度值偏大的缺陷，但所用的机时多几十倍。辐散直接调整法具有上述两种方法的优点，调整后的散度场和垂直速度场较合理，机时较变分法少几倍。
|
Comparative Study of Objective Analysis Methods for Mesoscale Wind Field |
| |
| Institution: | 1) (Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Academia Sinica); 2) (Academy of Meteorological Science, SMA); 3) (National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center, SOA); 4) (Environmental Protection Research Institute for Electric Power, Ministry of Energy, Nanjin |
| |
| Abstract: | The strong and weak points of direct-difference, variational calculus and direct-adjusting divergence methods for mesoscale wind field have been evaluated by numerical experiments. The major results of experiments are as follows: (1) As shown in other experiments, the direct-difference method can get a wind field of minimum integral divergence with a short computer time, but the vertical motion obtained in the upper calculation area is overestimated. (2) The variational calculus method is able to overcome the above disadvantage, but the computer time needed is too much. (3) The direct-adjusting divergence method possesses the advantages of the former two methods and can get a reasonable divergence wind field with a compromising computer time. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《应用气象学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《应用气象学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
