|
|||||
|
|
Apollo 12 Lunar Module exhaust plume impingement on Lunar Surveyor III |
|
| Authors: | Christopher Immer Paul E Hintze |
| Institution: | a Applied Physics Laboratory, ASRC Aerospace, ASRC-24, Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899, United States b NASA Kennedy Space Center, Granular Mechanics and Regolith Operations Laboratory, NE-S-1, Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899, United States c NASA Kennedy Space Center, Corrosion Technology Laboratory, NE-L2-C, Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899, United States d Applied Physics Laboratory, ASRC Aerospace, ASRC-15, Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899, United States e Applied Physics Laboratory, ASRC Aerospace, ASRC-48, Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899, United States |
| Abstract: | Understanding plume impingement by retrorockets on the surface of the Moon is paramount for safe lunar outpost design in NASA’s planned return to the Moon for the Constellation Program. Visual inspection, Scanning Electron Microscopy, and surface scanned topology have been used to investigate the damage to the Lunar Surveyor III spacecraft that was caused by the Apollo 12 Lunar Module’s close proximity landing. Two parts of the Surveyor III craft returned by the Apollo 12 astronauts, Coupons 2050 and 2051, which faced the Apollo 12 landing site, show that a fine layer of lunar regolith coated the materials and was subsequently removed by the Apollo 12 Lunar Module landing rocket. The coupons were also pitted by the impact of larger soil particles with an average of 103 pits/cm2. The average entry size of the pits was 83.7 μm (major diameter) × 74.5 μm (minor diameter) and the average estimated penetration depth was 88.4 μm. Pitting in the surface of the coupons correlates to removal of lunar fines and is likely a signature of lunar material imparting localized momentum/energy sufficient to cause cracking of the paint. Comparison with the lunar soil particle size distribution and the optical density of blowing soil during lunar landings indicates that the Surveyor III spacecraft was not exposed to the direct spray of the landing Lunar Module, but instead experienced only the fringes of the spray of soil. Had Surveyor III been exposed to the direct spray, the damage would have been orders of magnitude higher. |
| Keywords: | Moon Surface Experimental techniques Cratering Impact processes |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ | |