Thermoelasticity and high-<Emphasis Type="Italic">T</Emphasis> behaviour of anthophyllite |
| |
Authors: | Mark D Welch Fernando Cámara Roberta Oberti |
| |
Institution: | 1.Department of Mineralogy,The Natural History Museum,London,UK;2.CNR-Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse, Unità di Pavia,Pavia,Italy |
| |
Abstract: | The thermoelastic behaviour of anthophyllite has been determined for a natural crystal with crystal-chemical formula ANa0.01
B(Mg1.30Mn0.57Ca0.09Na0.04) C(Mg4.95Fe0.02Al0.03) T(Si8.00)O22
W(OH)2 using single-crystal X-ray diffraction to 973 K. The best model for fitting the thermal expansion data is that of Berman
(J Petrol 29:445–522, 1988) in which the coefficient of volume thermal expansion varies linearly with T as α
V,T
= a
1 + 2a
2 (T − T
0): α298 = a
1 = 3.40(6) × 10−5 K−1, a
2 = 5.1(1.0) × 10−9 K−2. The corresponding axial thermal expansion coefficients for this linear model are: α
a
,298 = 1.21(2) × 10−5 K−1, a
2,a
= 5.2(4) × 10−9 K−2; α
b
,298 = 9.2(1) × 10−6 K−1, a
2,b
= 7(2) × 10−10 K−2. α
c
,298 = 1.26(3) × 10−5 K−1, a
2,c
= 1.3(6) × 10−9 K−2. The thermoelastic behaviour of anthophyllite differs from that of most monoclinic (C2/m) amphiboles: (a) the ε
1 − ε
2 plane of the unit-strain ellipsoid, which is normal to b in anthophyllite but usually at a high angle to c in monoclinic amphiboles; (b) the strain components are ε
1 ≫ ε
2 > ε
3 in anthophyllite, but ε
1 ~ ε
2 ≫ ε
3 in monoclinic amphiboles. The strain behaviour of anthophyllite is similar to that of synthetic C2/m
ANa B(LiMg) CMg5
TSi8 O22
W(OH)2, suggesting that high contents of small cations at the B-site may be primarily responsible for the much higher thermal expansion
⊥(100). Refined values for site-scattering at M4 decrease from 31.64 epfu at 298 K to 30.81 epfu at 973 K, which couples with similar increases of those of M1 and M2 sites. These changes in site scattering are interpreted in terms of Mn ↔ Mg exchange involving M1,2 ↔ M4, which was first detected at 673 K. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|