Conceptualizations of local knowledge in collaborative environmental governance |
| |
| Authors: | Brent Taylor Rob C de Loë |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Geography and Water Policy and Governance Group, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1;2. Faculty of Environment, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1;1. Department of Geography, P.O. Box 3000, Fi-90014, University of Oulu, Finland;2. University of Helsinki, Ruralia Institute, Finland;1. Nordic Institute of Asian Studies, University of Copenhagen, Leifsgade 33, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark;2. Department of Geography and Geology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 10, 1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark |
| |
| Abstract: | A major challenge to integrating local knowledge into collaborative environmental governance processes stems from the underlying differences between positivist science and local knowledge; these differences often result in strong differences of opinion regarding which forms of knowledge are valid in environmental decision-making. Previous research on these issues has mainly focused on the attitudes of scientists towards local knowledge. Studies of the views of local and non-scientific actors regarding their own knowledge are much less common. Through a qualitative case study of water allocation planning in South Australia, we analyzed participants’ conceptualizations of local knowledge and the role of local knowledge in collaborative governance. We found that participants defined local knowledge broadly across a number of dimensions and that many acknowledged variability in the nature and quality of different types of local knowledge. While most recognized the value of local knowledge in supporting technical investigations and developing policies, very few participants identified a role for local knowledge in the early stages of the collaborative process (i.e., in framing problems or establishing research protocols). Previous research has highlighted “epistemological anxiety” among scientists and resource managers toward local knowledge as a significant barrier to its effective use in environmental decision-making. This study suggests that state and local actors, and scientists and non-scientists, share similar reservations about local knowledge and highlights the need for researchers and practitioners to take into account the attitudes of all types of participants when considering how to overcome the epistemological challenges related to integrating local knowledge into collaborative management. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
