Results of foF2 and Ne-h profiles at low latitude using recent digital ionosonde observations and their comparison with IRI-2000 |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Architecture and Planning, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, 462003, India;2. Department of Architecture, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PX, United Kingdom;3. Centre for Urban Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400076, India;4. Interdisciplinary Programme (IDP) in Climate Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400076, India;5. Department of Computer Science and Engineering (CSE), Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400076, India |
| |
| Abstract: | Using digital ionosonde observations at low-latitude station, Delhi (28.6 N, 77.2 E, mag. dip 42.4 N), the diurnal and seasonal variations of the critical frequency of F2 layer (foF2) are analyzed from August 2000 to July 2001 during a high solar activity period. Also, noontime bottomside electron density (Ne-h) profiles, below the F2-peak, are derived from ionogram, using the POLAN (Report UAG-93, WDC-A, for Solar Terrestrial Physics, Boulder, Co.) program during the same period, and these profiles are then normalized to the peak height and density (hmF2, NmF2) of the F2-region. These observations are used to assess the predictability of the International Reference Ionosphere, IRI-2000 model (Radio Sc. 36(2) (2001) 261). Results show in general, a large variability, (1σ, σ is standard deviation), in foF2 during nighttime than daytime during winter and equinox, the variability of foF2 about the mean is about ±25% by night and ±15% by day. The IRI model shows a fairly good agreement with foF2 observations during daytime, however during nighttime, the discrepancies between the two exist. Comparative studies of the normalized observed profiles with those obtained with the IRI model (Bilitza, 2001) using both the options namely: Gulyaeva's (Adv. Space Res. 7 (1987) 39) model and B0-Table (Adv. Space Res. 25(1) (2000) 89), show that during all the seasons, in general, the B0-Tab option, reveals a better agreement with the observations, while the IRI model using Gulyaeva's option, overestimates the electron density distribution during summer and equinox, however, during winter, the model is close to the observations. The comparisons of average profile shape parameters (B0,B1) derived from noontime observed profiles, with those obtained, using B0-Tab option, in the IRI model, show a good agreement during all the seasons. However, B0, B1 obtained, using Gulyaeva's option in the IRI model, show a disagreement with the derived B0, B1 values during all the seasons, except during winter, for B0 parameter. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
