|
|||||
|
|
Seismic behavior of an inverted T-shape flexible retaining wall via dynamic centrifuge tests |
|
| Authors: | Seong-Bae Jo Jeong-Gon Ha Mintaek Yoo Yun Wook Choo Dong-Soo Kim |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-701, Republic of Korea 2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, 2513 Boelter Hall, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA 3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Kongju National University, 1223-24 Cheonan-Daero, Subuk, Cheonan, Chungnam, 330-717, Republic of Korea |
| Abstract: | In the design procedure for a retaining wall, the pseudo-static method has been widely used and dynamic earth pressure is calculated by the Mononobe–Okabe method, which is an extension of Coulomb’s earth pressure theory computed by force equilibrium. However, there is no clear empirical basis for treating the seismic force as a static force, and recent experimental research has shown that the Mononobe–Okabe method is quite conservative, and there exists a discrepancy between the assumed conditions and real seismic behavior during an earthquake. Two dynamic centrifuge tests were designed and conducted to reexamine the Mononobe–Okabe method and to evaluate the seismic lateral earth pressure on an inverted T-shape flexible retaining wall with a dry medium sand backfill. Results from two sets of dynamic centrifuge experiments show that inertial force has a significant impact on the seismic behavior on the flexible retaining wall. The dynamic earth pressure at the time of maximum moment during the earthquake was not synchronized and almost zero. The relationship between the back-calculated dynamic earth pressure coefficient at the time of maximum dynamic wall moment and the peak ground acceleration obtained from the wall base peak ground acceleration indicates that the seismic earth pressure on flexible cantilever retaining walls can be neglected at accelerations below 0.4 g. These results suggest that a wall designed with a static factor of safety should be able to resist seismic loads up to 0.3–0.4 g. |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ | |