Hybrid Neoliberalism: Implications for Sustainable Development |
| |
| Authors: | Claudia Baldwin Graham Marshall Helen Ross Jim Cavaye Janet Stephenson Lyn Carter |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Regional and Urban Planning, University of the Sunshine Coast;2. Maroochydore DC, QLD, Australia;3. School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia;4. School of Agriculture and Food Sciences Faculty of Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia;5. Regional Community Development, Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia;6. Centre for Sustainability, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand;7. Kai Tahu, Kati Mamoe, Waitaha, Te Tumu, School Maori, Pacific and Indigenous Studies, University of Otago, Otepoti/Dunedin, Te Wai Pounamu/New Zealand |
| |
| Abstract: | Neoliberalism is frequently blamed for challenges in achieving sustainable development; consequently some also question if sustainability is still a useful concept. Neoliberal influence on natural resource management has evolved over the last 30?years to a hybrid form that seeks to compensate for its negative social and environmental externalities. Through review of literature and critical analysis of three case studies of resource development in Australia and New Zealand, we argue that, in spite of modifications under hybrid approaches, neoliberalism still tests achievement of sustainability goals, due to privileging industry and shifting risk and costs to future generations, through inadequate regulation, neglect of public consultation, lack of transparency, and weak impact assessment. We suggest that while neoliberal approaches bring both benefits and disadvantages, sustainability principles must continue to be kept at the forefront of legislation, regulation and management. |
| |
| Keywords: | Coal seam gas hybrid neoliberalism offshore mining indigenous water allocation |
|
|
