Mapping and measuring place attachment |
| |
| Institution: | 1. School of Geography, Planning, and Environmental Management, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072 Australia;2. School of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Australia;3. Barbara Hardy Institute, University of South Australia, Australia;4. Enviroconnect, PO Box 190, Stirling, SA 5152, Australia;1. School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia;2. Geography Division, Department of Geography and Geology, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland;3. Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, 1958 Fredriksberg C, Denmark;1. Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Design and Architecture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor Malaysia;2. Department of Landscape Architecture, Kulliyyah of Architecture and Environmental Design, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 50728, Malaysia;1. Ariel University, School of Architecture, P.O. Box 3, 44837, Israel;2. Universidad de La Laguna, Department of Psychology, Campus de Guajara, s/n, 38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain;1. Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave. Urbana, IL, 61801, USA;2. Department of Coaching, Kyunghee University, South Korea;3. Human Dimensions of Natural Resources Laboratory, Texas A&M University, USA;4. University of Arkansas System, Division of Agriculture, USA;5. Division of Fish and Wildlife, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, USA;6. Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science, University of Helsinki, Finland;1. Interaction and Social Change Research Group (GRICS), Social Psychology Departmental Section, University of Barcelona, Spain;2. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 240 West Prospect Road Fort Collins, Colorado, 80526, USA;3. Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS), University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65 00014, Helsinki, Finland;4. Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Economics and Social Sciences Research Unit, Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland;5. University of Zurich, Faculty of Science, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zürich, Switzerland;6. Department of Geography, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Rennes Drive, Exeter, EX4 4RJ, UK;7. Transdisciplinarity Lab, D-USYS, ETH Zürich, Switzerland;8. Department of Psychology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland;9. Dept of Landscape Architecture, College of Built Environments, PO Box 355734 University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195, USA;10. Department of Work Science, Business Economics and Environmental Psychology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp. Box 52, SE-230 53, Alnarp, Sweden;11. Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, 101 Fernow Hall, USA;12. Water Engineering and Management, Faculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, the Netherlands;13. Dutch Research Institute for Transitions (DRIFT), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Postbus 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, the Netherlands |
| |
| Abstract: | The concept of place attachment has been studied extensively across multiple disciplines but only recently with empirical measurement using public participation GIS (PPGIS) and related crowd-sourcing mapping methods. This research trialed a spatially explicit method for identifying place attachment in a regional study in South Australia. Our research objectives were to (1) analyze and present the spatial results of the mapping method as a benchmark for future research, (2) compare mapped place attachment to the more common practice of mapping landscape values in PPGIS that comprise a values home range, (3) identify how participant socio-demographic and home location attributes influence place attachment, (4) provide some guidance for mapping place attachment in future research. We found large spatial variability in individual place attachment and mapped landscape values using both area and distance-based measures. The area of place attachment is influenced by occupational roles such as farming or conservation, as well as home location, especially in coastal versus non-coastal contexts. The spatial distribution of mapped landscape values or values home range is related to, but not identical to mapped place attachment with just over half of landscape values located outside the area of mapped place attachment. Economic livelihood values, as an indicator of place dependence, and social values, as an indicator of place identity, are more likely to be mapped within the place attachment area. Aggregated place attachment across participants in the region showed similar spatial intensity to aggregated values home range, but area-based assessment of place attachment and values home range are distorted by edge effects such as a coastline. To further develop the mapping of place attachment in PPGIS, we identify knowledge gaps from our study and offer suggestions for future research design. |
| |
| Keywords: | PPGIS Place attachment Home range Spatial analysis |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
