Remotely sensed estimation of forest canopy density: A comparison of the performance of four methods |
| |
| Authors: | Chudamani Joshi Jan De Leeuw Andrew K Skidmore Iris C van Duren Henk van Oosten |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Plant Resources, Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation, Thapathali, Kathmandu, Nepal;2. International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), P.O. Box 6, Hengelosestraat 99, 7500AA Enschede, The Netherlands |
| |
| Abstract: | In recent years, a number of alternative methods have been proposed to predict forest canopy density from remotely sensed data. To date, however, it remains difficult to decide which method to use, since their relative performance has never been evaluated. In this study the performance of: (1) an artificial neural network, (2) a multiple linear regression, (3) the forest canopy density mapper and (4) a maximum likelihood classification method was compared for prediction of forest canopy density using a Landsat ETM+ image. Comparison of confusion matrices revealed that the regression model performed significantly worse than the three other methods. These results were based on a z-test for comparison of weighted kappa statistics, which is an appropriate statistic for analysis of ranked categories. About 89% of the variance of the observed canopy density was explained by the artificial neural networks, which outperformed the other three methods in this respect. Moreover, the artificial neural networks gave an unbiased prediction, while other methods systematically under or over predicted forest canopy density. The choice of biased method could have a high impact on canopy density inventories. |
| |
| Keywords: | Forest canopy density Classification Remote sensing Neural networks Weighted kappa Bias prediction |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
