首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

反应位移法抗震设计中地基弹簧系数取值的探讨
引用本文:丁德云,杨秀仁.反应位移法抗震设计中地基弹簧系数取值的探讨[J].西北地震学报,2016,38(5):685-692.
作者姓名:丁德云  杨秀仁
作者单位:北京城建设计发展集团股份有限公司, 北京 100037;北京九州一轨隔振技术有限公司, 北京 100070,北京城建设计发展集团股份有限公司, 北京 100037
基金项目:北京市科学技术委员会科技新星计划(xx2016008);北京城建设计发展集团股份有限公司科技创新计划(2015-18)
摘    要:随着城市轨道交通工程抗震性能越来越受到关注,反应位移法作为一种简捷的抗震设计方法被大量应用于地下结构抗震设计中。地基弹簧系数的确定方法是反应位移法抗震设计中最为重要的因素之一,本文选取试验法、李英民法、MIDAS法和有限元法,结合北京典型地层,对比分析这四种方法地基弹簧系数取值对地下结构的弯矩、轴力和剪力的影响规律。结果表明:(1)在反应位移法计算中,地基弹簧系数取值对结构内力响应具有重要影响,对结构轴力和剪力的影响较大,而对于弯矩的影响相对较小;(2)地基弹簧系数获取方法优选试验法,在无地勘资料情况下,经验公式和有限元法可作为备选方法;(3)综合考虑四种不同地基弹簧系数确定方法对结构内力影响程度,为保证结构设计的安全性,可对试验法下结构内力进行系数修正,修正系数建议值为1.10。

关 键 词:抗震设计  地基弹簧  反应位移法  地下结构
收稿时间:2016/4/26 0:00:00

Discussion on the Spring Constant of Ground Foundation in the SeismicDesign of Underground Structures Using the Response Displacement Method
DING De-yun and YANG Xiu-ren.Discussion on the Spring Constant of Ground Foundation in the SeismicDesign of Underground Structures Using the Response Displacement Method[J].Northwestern Seismological Journal,2016,38(5):685-692.
Authors:DING De-yun and YANG Xiu-ren
Institution:Beijing Urban Construction Design & Development Group Co., Limited, Beijing 100037, China;Beijing Jiuzhouyigui Shock & Vibration Isolation Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100070, China and Beijing Urban Construction Design & Development Group Co., Limited, Beijing 100037, China
Abstract:Urban rail engineering faces significant challenges with regard to an earthquake resistant design of underground structures. The response displacement method is a simple method, which is widely used to design such structures. Thus, determining the ground spring constant in the seismic design of underground structures is very important. Four typical determination methods are introduced:the test method, Li''s method, the MIDAS method, and the finite element method. Based on the values of the ground spring constant determined through these four methods and considering the local geological conditions in Beijing, response displacement models are used to obtain the bending moment, axial force, and shear force of the underground structures. The four determination methods are compared on the basis of their respective advantages and disadvantages. The results show that the values of the ground spring constant have a significant influence on the internal force response of underground structures. Moreover, using the response displacement method, we observe that the constant has a greater influence on the axial force and shear force and comparatively lesser influence on the bending moment. The test method is recommended for designers, when geological survey data are not available. The empirical formula and the finite element method can be used as alternative methods. In order to ensure design safety, the internal force of underground structures can be modified by a correction factor of 1.10, considering that the four typical determination methods have an impact on the internal force.
Keywords:seismic design  ground spring  response displacement method  underground structure
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《西北地震学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《西北地震学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号