On the nature of lead–lag relationships during glacial–interglacial climate transitions |
| |
| Authors: | Andrey Ganopolski Didier M Roche |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA;2. Departamento de Geologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil;3. Department of Geological Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA;4. Department of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA;5. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA;6. Climate and Global Dynamics, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307, USA;7. Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | Analysis of leads and lags between different paleoclimate records remains an important method in paleoclimatology, used to propose and test hypotheses about causal relationships between different processes in the climate system. The robust lead of Antarctic temperature over CO2 concentration during several recent glacial–interglacial transitions inferred from the Antarctic ice cores apparently contradicts the concept of CO2-driven climate change and still remains unexplained. Here, using an Earth system model of intermediate complexity and generic scenarios for the principal climatic forcings during glacial–interglacial transitions we performed a suite of experiments that shed some light on the complexity of phase relationships between climate forcing and climate system response. In particular, our results provide an explanation for the observed Antarctic temperature lead over CO2 concentration. It is shown that the interhemispheric oceanic heat transport provides a crucial link between the two hemispheres. We demonstrate that temporal variations of the oceanic heat transport strongly contribute to the observed phase relationship between polar temperature records in both hemispheres. It is shown that the direct effect of orbital variations on the Antarctic temperature is also significant and explains the observed cooling trend during interglacials. In addition, an imbedded δ18O model is used to demonstrate that during glacial–interglacial transitions, the temporal evolution of deep calcite marine δ18O in different locations and at different depths can considerably deviate from that implied by the global ice volume change. This finding indicates that the synchronization of different marine records by means of foraminiferal calcite δ18O yield large additional uncertainties. Based on our results, we argue that the analysis of leads and lags alone, without a comprehensive understanding and an adequate model of all relevant climate processes, cannot provide direct information about causal relationships in the climate system. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
