首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Accuracy of crowdsourced streamflow and stream level class estimates
Authors:Barbara Strobl  Simon Etter  Ilja van Meerveld  Jan Seibert
Institution:1. Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerlandbarbara.strobl@geo.uzh.chORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5530-4632;3. Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7553-9102;4. Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7547-3270;5. Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland;6. Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, SwedenORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6314-2124
Abstract:ABSTRACT

Streamflow data are important for river management and the calibration of hydrological models. However, such data are only available for gauged catchments. Citizen science offers an alternative data source, and can be used to estimate streamflow at ungauged sites. We evaluated the accuracy of crowdsourced streamflow estimates for 10 streams in Switzerland by asking citizens to estimate streamflow either directly, or based on the estimated width, depth and velocity of the stream. Additionally, we asked them to estimate the stream level class by comparing the current stream level with a picture that included a virtual staff gauge. To compare the different estimates, the stream level class estimates were converted into streamflow. The results indicate that stream level classes were estimated more accurately than streamflow, and more accurately represented high and low flow conditions. Based on this result, we suggest that citizen science projects focus on stream level class estimates instead of streamflow estimates.
Keywords:citizen science  crowdsourcing  stream level  stream level class  streamflow  accuracy  CrowdWater
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号