|
|||||
|
|
| 薄盘光滑样条插值中三种协变量方法的降水量插值精度比较 | |
| 引用本文： | 刘正佳,于兴修,王丝丝,商贵铎.薄盘光滑样条插值中三种协变量方法的降水量插值精度比较[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(1):56-62. |
| 作者姓名： | 刘正佳 于兴修 王丝丝 商贵铎 |
| 作者单位： | 1. 临沂大学山东省水土保持与环境保育重点实验室／资源环境学院。山东临沂276005／中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京100101／山东师范大学人口资源与环境学院,济南250014 2. 临沂大学山东省水土保持与环境保育重点实验室／资源环境学院。山东临沂276005 3. 香港中文大学地理与资源管理学系,香港 4. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京100101／山东师范大学人口资源与环境学院,济南250014 |
| 基金项目： | 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目，临沂市重大科技创新项目 |
| 摘 要： | 在薄盘光滑样条插值中,高相关协变量的选取决定了插值结果的精确性。以2001-2009年全国728个气象站点日降水为数据源,提取年降水量数据,在分析多年平均降水量与两协变量高程（DEM）和距海岸线距离（DCL）的空间相关性基础上,利用ANUSPLIN软件,比较不同协变量下降水量插值结果精度在全国尺度以及区域尺度上的差异。以DEM、DCL及DEM-DCL分别为协变量对降水量数据进行空间插值发现：①在全国尺度上,DEM法的平均绝对误差（MAE）为47.79,略低于DEM-DCL法（48.90）,但显著低于DCL法（55.54）;且DEM法的平均相对误差和均方根误差也明显低于其它两种方法。②在区域尺度上,除西藏地区外的其他7个区域,3种方法的插值误差与全国尺度上相一致。西藏地区降水插值结果以DCL法的精度最高,而DEM法则较差。研究建议除在西藏地区的降水量插值研究中采用DCL法,在全国其他大部分区域采用DEM法。 |
| 关 键 词： | 降水量插值 ANUSPLIN 协变量 精度 |
Comparative Analysis of Three Covariates Methods in Thin-Plate Smoothing Splines for Interpolating Precipitation |
|
| LIU Zhengjia,YU Xingxiu,WANG Sisi,SHANG Guiduo.Comparative Analysis of Three Covariates Methods in Thin-Plate Smoothing Splines for Interpolating Precipitation[J].Progress in Geography,2012,31(1):56-62. | |
| Authors: | LIU Zhengjia YU Xingxiu WANG Sisi SHANG Guiduo |
| Institution: | 2,3(1.Linyi University,The Key Laboratory of Soil & Water Conservation and Environment Protection of Shandong Province/College of Resources Environment,Linyi,276005,Shandong,China;2.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,CAS,Beijing,100101,China;3.College of Population,Resource and Environment,Shandong Normal University,Jinan 250014,China;4.Department of Geography and Resource Management,the Chinese University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong,China) |
| Abstract: | In the thin-plate smoothing splines interpolation,the accuracy of interpolation results is mainly determined by choosing the independent covariate.Annual precipitation data were extracted by using daily precipitation data of 728 meteorological stations from 2001 to 2009 in China.We evaluated spatial correlation relationships between annual precipitation and two covariates such as DEM and distance from the coastline to each point(DCL) and compared the accuracy difference of precipitation interpolation results from different covariates in the national scale and regional scale.All interpolation work has been conducted with the aid of the software of ANUSPLIN.We used three interpolation methods,which respectively considered DEM,DCL and DEM-DCL as the covariates to obtain spatial distribution of precipitation.Our analyses show that,(1) in the national scale,the mean absolute error(MAE) of interpolation method of DEM is 47.79,which is slightly lower than that of the method of DEM-DCL(48.90),while obviously lower than that of the method of DCL(55.54),and MRE and RMSE of the method of DEM were also lower than other two methods significantly.(2) In regional scale,the errors of three methods of interpolation are the same as that in national scale except Tibet.The accuracy of precipitation interpolation results was the highest using DCL method,and the poorest using DEM method.Results suggest that precipitation interpolation method of DEM could be widely used in some relevant national scale researches,and precipitation interpolation method of DCL was strongly recommended in Tibet. |
| Keywords: | precipitation interpolation ANUSPLIN covariates accuracy |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |
| 点击此处可从《地理科学进展》浏览原始摘要信息 | |
| 点击此处可从《地理科学进展》下载免费的PDF全文 | |