Estimating the timescale of fluvial response to anthropogenic disturbance using two generations of dams on the South River,Massachusetts, USA |
| |
| Authors: | Samantha Dow Noah P Snyder William B Ouimet Anna M Martini Brian Yellen Jonathan D Woodruff Robert M Newton Dorothy J Merritts Robert C Walter |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA;2. Department of Geosciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA;3. Department of Geology, Amherst College, Amherst, MA, USA;4. Department of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA;5. Department of Geosciences, Smith College, Northampton, MA, USA;6. Department of Earth and Environment, Franklin & Marshall College, Lancaster, PA, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | Centuries-long intensive land-use change in the north-eastern United States provides the opportunity to study the timescale of geomorphic response to anthropogenic disturbances. In this region, forest-clearing and agricultural practices following EuroAmerican settlement led to deposition of legacy sediment along valley bottoms, including behind mill dams. The South River in western Massachusetts experienced two generations of damming, beginning with mill dams up to 6-m high in the eighteenth–nineteenth century, and followed by construction of the Conway Electric Dam (CED), a 17-m-tall hydroelectric dam near the watershed outlet in 1906. We use the mercury (Hg) concentration in upstream deposits along the South River to constrain the magnitude, source, and timing of inputs to the CED impoundment. Based on cesium-137 (137Cs) chronology and results from a sediment mixing model, remobilized legacy sediment comprised  % of the sediment load in the South River prior to 1954; thereafter, from 1954 to 1980s, erosion from glacial deposits likely dominated (63 ± 14%), but with legacy sediments still a substantial source (37 ± 14%). We also use the CED reservoir deposits to estimate sediment yield through time, and find it decreased after 1952. These results are consistent with high rates of mobilization of legacy sediment as historic dams breached in the early twentieth century, and suggest rapid initial response to channel incision, followed by a long decay in the second half of the century, that is likely dependent on large flood events to access legacy sediment stored in banks. Identifying sources of sediment in a watershed and quantifying erosion rates can help to guide river restoration practices. Our findings suggest a short fluvial recovery time from the eighteenth–nineteenth century to perturbation during the first half of the twentieth century, with subsequent return to a dominant long-term signal from erosion of glacial deposits, with anthropogenic sediment persisting as a secondary source. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| |
| Keywords: | legacy sediment dams mercury sediment fingerprinting sediment yield |
|
|
