Spatial Distribution of Fractures in the Asmari Formation of Iran in Subsurface Environment: Effect of Lithology and Petrophysical Properties |
| |
| Authors: | Nemati Masoud Pezeshk Hamid |
| |
| Institution: | (1) Petroleum Geology Research Department, E and P Research Centre, Research Institute of Petroleum Industry (RIPI), National School Oil Company, Tehran, Iran;(2) Department of Mathematics Statistics and Computer Science, University College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran;(3) Petroleum Geology Research Department, RIPI, Pazhooheshgah Blvd. Khairabad, Old Qom Road, P.O. Box 18745-4163, Rey, Tehran, Iran |
| |
| Abstract: | The distribution of fractures and its dependence on lithology and petrophysical properties of rock in the Asmari Formation were examined using three wells data of one of the largest oil fields of southwestern Iran. Fractures were measured on cut cores. Mineral content and petrophysical data were obtained through thin section study and core plug measurement respectively. Influence of mineral composition and petrophysical property of rocks on fracture density was explored statistically. Increasing quartz (sand) and anhydrite content of rocks decrease and dolomite increases the threshold of fracture densities, however no significant relation was observed between calcite content of rock and fracture density. Increasing porosity and permeability of rock decrease the threshold of fracture density in some of the defined lithology groups. There are significant differences between the lithology groups in terms of fracture density, although the results in the three wells are not the same. In whole data, the highest fracture density can be observed in dolostone. Limestone and impure carbonates hold broader spaced fractures and sandstones display the least fracture density. The average fracture densities in the wells are strictly different. These differences are the result of the structural position of the wells and also the trend of the well and fractures. The distribution of fractures in most lithology groups can be explained by the function:  , where F is relative frequency, D is fracture density and a, b, and c are constants. |
| |
| Keywords: | Fractured resevoir Zagros carbonate reservoir Asmari formation |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
