|
|||||
|
|
| 土壤多样性理论方法的新近发展与应用 | |
| 引用本文： | 张学雷,陈杰,檀满枝,龚子同.土壤多样性理论方法的新近发展与应用[J].地球科学进展,2003,18(3):374-379. |
| 作者姓名： | 张学雷 陈杰 檀满枝 龚子同 |
| 作者单位： | 中国科学院南京土壤研究所,江苏,南京,210008 |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金项目“基于土壤多样性理论的土壤空间可变性研究”(编号 :40 1710 44)，国家重点基础研究发展规划项目“首都北京及周边地区大气、水、土环境污染机理与调控原理”(编号 :G19990 45 70 7)资助 |
| 摘 要： | 与建议也陆续出现 ,按此势头发展下去 ,极有可能使传统土壤学发扬光大 ,对拓宽环境管理与评价的途径具有重要意义。在国家自然科学基金的资助下 ,我们已经将土壤多样性的理论方法介绍到中国3 4,3 5] ,并且在山东省 1∶10 0万SOTER数据库支持下 ,进行了探索性研究①3 6 ] 。目前正着手在海南SOTER数据库的支持下 ,对海南省土壤多样性进行多方位、多层次的分析研究 ,相信不久将会有相关研究报告发表土壤多样性理论方法的新近发展与应用@张学雷$中国科学院南京土壤研究所!江苏南京210008
@陈杰$中国科学院南京土壤研究所!江苏南京210… |
| 关 键 词： | 土壤多样性 多度分布模型、丰富度与面积曲线 土壤与生物类型单元的关系 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-8166(2003)03-0374-06 |
SOME MOST RECENT RESEARCH PROGRESS ON PEDODIVERSITY |
|
| ZHANG Xue-lei,CHEN Jie,TAN Man-zhi,GONG Zi-tong.SOME MOST RECENT RESEARCH PROGRESS ON PEDODIVERSITY[J].Advance in Earth Sciences,2003,18(3):374-379. | |
| Authors: | ZHANG Xue-lei CHEN Jie TAN Man-zhi GONG Zi-tong |
| Institution: | Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China |
| Abstract: | Abundance distribution models and diversity-area relationships are tools of biological diversity analysis that have been used by ecologists for decades. In a case study by Ibáñez et al., these techniques are considered in a more general setting, and have been applied to explore notions such as pedodiversity (as an example of geodiversity in a broad sense, including also geomorphic diversity), in order to detect the differences and similarities between both natural resources, biological and non-biological. The discussion has mainly been conducted through the study of the Aegean Islandsby the Spanish research team. Standard statistical techniques have been applied to analyze how the pedotaxa-abundance distribution conforms to the abundance distribution models and how pedorichness-area data fit to the diversity-area models. No statistically significant difference has been observed between the abundance distribution models and the diversity-area relationships followed by biodiversity and pedodiversity data in similar situations. Thus, the studied results may suggest that some assumptions underlying biodiversity analysis ought to be carefully re-examined. Since results in ecological literature are usually interpreted in biological terms, the analysis by Ibáñez et al. may be relevant to offer some suggestions to the following questions: What are the reasons for the similarities obtained between biotic and soil resources? Should the ecological theory modify some of its constructs once the said similarities have been proven? and what areits implications for environmental management and assessment? |
| Keywords: | Pedodiversity Abundance distribution models and diversity-area relationships Bio and pedotaxa area relationships |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |
| 点击此处可从《地球科学进展》浏览原始摘要信息 | |
| 点击此处可从《地球科学进展》下载免费的PDF全文 | |