Soil erosion assessment on hillslope of GCE using RUSLE model |
| |
| Authors: | Md Rabiul Islam Wan Zurina Wan Jaafar Lai Sai Hin Normaniza Osman Moktar Aziz Mohd Din Fathiah Mohamed Zuki Prashant Srivastava Tanvir Islam Md Ibrahim Adham |
| |
| Institution: | 1.Department of Civil Engineering,University of Malaya,Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia;2.Institute of Biological Sciences,University of Malaya,Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia;3.Department of Chemical Engineering,University of Malaya,Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia;4.Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development,Banaras Hindu University,Varanasi,India;5.Jet Propulsion Laboratory,California Institute of Technology,Pasadena,USA |
| |
| Abstract: | A new method for obtaining the C factor (i.e., vegetation cover and management factor) of the RUSLE model is proposed. The method focuses on the derivation of the C factor based on the vegetation density to obtain a more reliable erosion prediction. Soil erosion that occurs on the hillslope along the highway is one of the major problems in Malaysia, which is exposed to a relatively high amount of annual rainfall due to the two different monsoon seasons. As vegetation cover is one of the important factors in the RUSLE model, a new method that accounts for a vegetation density is proposed in this study. A hillslope near the Guthrie Corridor Expressway (GCE), Malaysia, is chosen as an experimental site whereby eight square plots with the size of \(8\times 8\) and \(5\times 5\) m are set up. A vegetation density available on these plots is measured by analyzing the taken image followed by linking the C factor with the measured vegetation density using several established formulas. Finally, erosion prediction is computed based on the RUSLE model in the Geographical Information System (GIS) platform. The C factor obtained by the proposed method is compared with that of the soil erosion guideline Malaysia, thereby predicted erosion is determined by both the C values. Result shows that the C value from the proposed method varies from 0.0162 to 0.125, which is lower compared to the C value from the soil erosion guideline, i.e., 0.8. Meanwhile predicted erosion computed from the proposed C value is between 0.410 and \(3.925\, \hbox {t ha}^{-1 }\,\hbox {yr}^{-1}\) compared to 9.367 to \(34.496\, \hbox {t ha}^{-1}\,\hbox {yr}^{-1 }\) range based on the C value of 0.8. It can be concluded that the proposed method of obtaining a reasonable C value is acceptable as the computed predicted erosion is found to be classified as a very low zone, i.e. less than \(10\, \hbox {t ha}^{-1 }\,\hbox {yr}^{-1}\) whereas the predicted erosion based on the guideline has classified the study area as a low zone of erosion, i.e., between 10 and \(50\, \hbox {t ha}^{-1 }\,\hbox {yr}^{-1}\). |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
