Cross-correlation beamforming |
| |
| Authors: | Elmer Ruigrok Steven Gibbons Kees Wapenaar |
| |
| Institution: | 1.Department of Earth Sciences,Utrecht University,Utrecht,The Netherlands;2.R&D Seismology and Acoustics,Royal Netherlands Meteorological institute,De Bilt,The Netherlands;3.NORSAR,Kjeller,Norway;4.Department of Geoscience and Engineering,Delft University of Technology,Delft,The Netherlands |
| |
| Abstract: | An areal distribution of sensors can be used for estimating the direction of incoming waves through beamforming. Beamforming may be implemented as a phase-shifting and stacking of data recorded on the different sensors (i.e., conventional beamforming). Alternatively, beamforming can be applied to cross-correlations between the waveforms on the different sensors. We derive a kernel for beamforming cross-correlated data and call it cross-correlation beamforming (CCBF). We point out that CCBF has slightly better resolution and aliasing characteristics than conventional beamforming. When auto-correlations are added to CCBF, the array response functions are the same as for conventional beamforming. We show numerically that CCBF is more resilient to non-coherent noise. Furthermore, we illustrate that with CCBF individual receiver-pairs can be removed to improve mapping to the slowness domain. An additional flexibility of CCBF is that cross-correlations can be time-windowed prior to beamforming, e.g., to remove the directionality of a scattered wavefield. The observations on synthetic data are confirmed with field data from the SPITS array (Svalbard). Both when beamforming an earthquake arrival and when beamforming ambient noise, CCBF focuses more of the energy to a central beam. Overall, the main advantage of CCBF is noise suppression and its flexibility to remove station pairs that deteriorate the signal-related beampower. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
